Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada Generation, not to be confused with the A4000, P4000 or RTX 4000 Turing Generation, is a very powerful professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 7,424 CUDA cores and 12 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM. Brought into existence in 2023, this graphics adapter leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve great performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 60 W to 175 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Hardware-wise, the RTX 4000 is a GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop in disguise. Consequently, both make use of the AD103 chip and have little difficulty running triple-A games at QHD 1440p.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache and an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used) and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 4000 features 58 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 232 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 7,424 CUDA cores, making it a lot faster than the RTX 3500 Ada Generation. Elsewhere, the graphics card comes with 12 GB of 192-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for a very healthy throughput of ~432 GB/s. Error correction can be turned off if desired. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the RTX 4000 is indeed targeted at professional users.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 4000 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however DP 1.4a video outputs can potentially prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring an RTX 4000 Ada Generation as of February 2024, we have plenty of performance data for the GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop, a graphics card with very similar specifications. Based on that, we fully expect the RTX 4000 to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 23 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 57,000
  • at least 115 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • close to 50 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 33.5 TFLOPS" of performance which is impressive. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation delivers a little over 42 TFLOPS, for reference.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 4000 is. One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is the case with the RTX 4000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 60 W while the highest is more than two times higher at 175 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 4000 Ada can easily be 60% slower than the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've already seen on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 4000 Ada is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

The Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 (Rocket-Lake GPU with 32 EUs) is a integrated graphics card in the high end Rocket-Lake CPUs. It is using the new Xe architecture (Gen12) and was announced in March 2021.

Compared to the previous generation of UHD Graphics ,the Xe architecture and the improved shader count lead to a big leap in graphics performance. Still, the UHD 750 is only suited for low demanding games or very low settings. The 48 EU version in Tiger Lake SoCs e.g. reached 46 fps in The Witcher 3 low 1024x768 and no fluent framerates in Mafia Definitive Edition.

The Rocket Lake SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the old 14nm+++ process at Intel.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation, not to be confused with the A500, P500 and the T500, is a lower-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 2,048 CUDA cores and a paltry 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. We believe this graphics card to be a heavily cut-down GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop; therefore, both should employ the Ada Lovelace AD107 chip built with TSMC's 5 nm process. The RTX 500 was launched in February 2024. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for this graphics card is moderately wide at 35 W to 60 W leading to noticeable performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same graphics card.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here; under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of proprietary Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI applications.

The RTX 500 Ada features 16 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 64 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 2,048 CUDA cores. Increase those numbers by 25%, and you get the RTX 1000 Ada - as long as we pay no attention to clock speed differences, of course. Unlike costlier Ada Generation professional laptop graphics cards, the RTX 500 comes with just 4 GB of non-ECC VRAM; the lack of error correction makes this card less suitable for super-important tasks and round-the-clock operation. The VRAM is just 64-bit wide, delivering an anemic bandwidth of ~128 GB/s.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol, just like Ampere-based cards did. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we are yet to test a single laptop powered by the RTX 500 Ada as of late February, it's realistic to expect it to be just a little slower than the average RTX 3050 Laptop. Yes, that's right; the RTX 500 has no chance of matching the RTX 4050 Laptop in sheer performance due to the reduced core count and smaller memory bus. Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 9.2 TFLOPS" of performance, a significant downgrade compared to 12.1 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 1000 Ada.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 500 Ada is.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. The RTX 500 Ada got luckier than many, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at 35 W while the highest value is 60 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). Real-world performance of the slowest RTX 500 Ada will probably be around 40% lower than that of the fastest one.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 500 Ada is built with makes for decent energy efficiency, as of early 2024.

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Iris Xe G7 96EUs 96 @ 0.4 - 1.35 GHz
Iris Xe G7 80EUs 80 @ 0.4 - 1.35 GHz
UHD Graphics 64EUs 64 @ 1.4 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 48 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics 32EUs 32 @ 1.25 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 32 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 32 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 24 @ 0.45 - 0.75 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 16 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
ArchitectureAda LovelaceGen. 12Ada Lovelace
Pipelines7424 - unified32 - unified2048 - unified
Raytracing Cores5816
Tensor / AI Cores23264
Theoretical Performance33.6 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz12000 effective = 1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynoyesno
Memory Bandwidth432 GB/s128 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6DirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)60 Watt (35 - 60 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm14 nm5 nm
PCIe4.0 x164.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement21.03.2023 30.03.2021 27.02.2024
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.comimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A3000 Laptop GPU
CodenameRocket Lake Xe
Core Speed350 - 1450 (Boost) MHz
FeaturesQuickSync
TMUs64
ROPs32
CPU in UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUsGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i9-11900K8 x 3500 MHz, 125 W350 MHz1300 MHz
Intel Core i7-11700K8 x 3600 MHz, 125 W350 MHz1300 MHz
Intel Core i5-11600K6 x 3900 MHz, 125 W350 MHz1300 MHz
min. - max.450 MHz750 - 1300 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
1 pt (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 383     avg: 622     median: 735 (2%)     max: 747 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 342     avg: 539     median: 634 (2%)     max: 642 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
50628 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 25463     avg: 29673     median: 29673 (4%)     max: 33883 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5545     avg: 10811     median: 12119 (13%)     max: 13460 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 7604     avg: 10689     median: 11315 (3%)     max: 12523 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1024     avg: 1860     median: 2094 (4%)     max: 2227 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1144     avg: 1955     median: 2174.5 (2%)     max: 2327 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 35756     avg: 39116     median: 38682.5 (5%)     max: 43344 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
2660 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
732 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
3692 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
4435 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1407     avg: 2653     median: 3264 (5%)     max: 3289 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1349     avg: 2328     median: 2811 (2%)     max: 2824 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
5134 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
4452 Points (3%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
8935 Points (10%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
3DMark 06
min: 8090     avg: 14361     median: 17392 (23%)     max: 17601 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
3.5 fps (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6088 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 22.96     avg: 25.5     median: 25.5 (9%)     max: 28.12 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 27.38     avg: 29.8     median: 28 (2%)     max: 34.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
31.7 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
2902 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
3872 Points (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 129     avg: 336     median: 336 (2%)     max: 543 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 369     avg: 742     median: 742 (1%)     max: 1115 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 700     avg: 1024     median: 1024 (1%)     max: 1348 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 14.2     avg: 44.8     median: 56.9 (8%)     max: 63.4 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 70     avg: 86.4     median: 92.9 (13%)     max: 96.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
21.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
18.8  fps
low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
12.9 (!)  fps
Valorant

Valorant

2020
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
198.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
64.1  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
50.8  fps
QHD 2560x1440
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
36.1  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
24  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
10.6  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
7.7  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
25.2 51.1 ~ 38 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
10.1 19 ~ 15 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
9.2 15 ~ 12 fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
13.2  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
11.3 17.6 18.3 ~ 16 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
8.5 17.3 18.8 ~ 15 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
7.6 16.4 18 ~ 14 fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
5.9 23 23.6 ~ 18 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
3.5 12.3 12.4 ~ 9 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
2.5 8.4 8.5 ~ 6 fps
QHD 2560x1440
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
6  fps
4K 3840x2160
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
3.5  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
35.1 84.8 126 132 133 ~ 102 fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
20.6 60.3 73.8 74.2 74.7 ~ 61 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
10.9 32.6 34.9 35.5 35.6 ~ 30 fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
9.9 30 31.9 32.5 32.6 ~ 27 fps
4K 3840x2160
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
12.4  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
36.8  fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs:
34.1  fps
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2221.118.8
God of War12.9
Valorant198.364.150.836.1
Metro Exodus2410.67.74
Strange Brigade38151213.2
X-Plane 11.11161514
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark189663.48
Dota 2 Reborn10261302712.4
GTA V36.834.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
5
2
1
1
5
1
2
4
2

2


1
1

2


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 04. 22:03:20

#0 checking url part for id 11607 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10943 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12426 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720123400 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11607 +0.019s ... 0.05s

#9 got single benchmarks 11607 +0s ... 0.05s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10943 +0.004s ... 0.054s

#11 got single benchmarks 10943 +0.006s ... 0.061s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12426 +0s ... 0.061s

#13 got single benchmarks 12426 +0s ... 0.061s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.075s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.075s

#17 Got 60 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.079s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.079s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.079s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.082s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.082s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.083s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)