Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada Generation, not to be confused with the A4000, P4000 or RTX 4000 Turing Generation, is a very powerful professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 7,424 CUDA cores and 12 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM. Brought into existence in 2023, this graphics adapter leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve great performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 60 W to 175 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Hardware-wise, the RTX 4000 is a GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop in disguise. Consequently, both make use of the AD103 chip and have little difficulty running triple-A games at QHD 1440p.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache and an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used) and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 4000 features 58 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 232 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 7,424 CUDA cores, making it a lot faster than the RTX 3500 Ada Generation. Elsewhere, the graphics card comes with 12 GB of 192-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for a very healthy throughput of ~432 GB/s. Error correction can be turned off if desired. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the RTX 4000 is indeed targeted at professional users.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 4000 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however DP 1.4a video outputs can potentially prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring an RTX 4000 Ada Generation as of February 2024, we have plenty of performance data for the GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop, a graphics card with very similar specifications. Based on that, we fully expect the RTX 4000 to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 23 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 57,000
  • at least 115 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • close to 50 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 33.5 TFLOPS" of performance which is impressive. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation delivers a little over 42 TFLOPS, for reference.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 4000 is. One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is the case with the RTX 4000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 60 W while the highest is more than two times higher at 175 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 4000 Ada can easily be 60% slower than the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've already seen on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 4000 Ada is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

► remove from comparison

Die Intel Xe Graphics 32 EUS (Alder Lake) ist eine Prozessorgrafikkarte, die Anfang 2023 vorgestellt wurde. Sie basiert auf die Xe Architektur (Gen12) und bietet in Alder Lake CPUs nur 32 der 96 verbauten Execution Units (EUs). Die GPU wird im verbesserten 10nm Verfahren (Intel 7) bei Intel gefertigt. Die Rohleistung ist vergleichbar mit der Radeon RX Vega 6 (in Ryzen 5000 CPUs), jedoch ist die Spieleleistung geringer durch den schwächeren Treibersupport (in 2022). Nur anspruchslose Spiele wie Dota 2 Reborn sind mit geringsten Settings flüssig spielbar (siehe unten).

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPUIntel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Gen. 12 / Xe Series
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Iris Xe G7 96EUs compare 96 @ 0.4 - 1.35 GHz
Iris Xe G7 80EUs compare 80 @ 0.4 - 1.35 GHz
UHD Graphics 64EUs compare 64 @ 1.4 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compare 48 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics 32EUs 32 @ 1.25 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compare 32 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compare 32 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) compare 24 @ 0.45 - 0.75 GHz
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compare 16 @ 0.35 - 1.45 GHz
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
Pipelines7424 - unified32 - unified
Raytracing Cores58
Tensor / AI Cores232
Theoretical Performance33.6 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB
Shared Memorynoyes
Memory Bandwidth432 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A3000 Laptop GPU
CodenameAlder Lake Xe
Core Speed1250 MHz
CPU in UHD Graphics 32EUsGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i3-N3058 x 1800 MHz, 15 W1000 MHz1250 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - UHD Graphics 32EUs
0.9 pt (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 599     avg: 626     median: 613 (2%)     max: 666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 523     avg: 547     median: 536 (1%)     max: 583 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 64090     avg: 76155     median: 76154.5 (9%)     max: 88219 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 38285     avg: 38839     median: 38839 (5%)     max: 39393 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 7939     avg: 10785     median: 11402.5 (12%)     max: 12397 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 10945     avg: 12633     median: 12687 (3%)     max: 14214 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1574     avg: 1726     median: 1733 (3%)     max: 1862 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1736     avg: 1880     median: 1894.5 (2%)     max: 1995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 53717     avg: 54586     median: 54586 (7%)     max: 55455 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2390     avg: 2817     median: 2920 (4%)     max: 3037 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2194     avg: 2527     median: 2612 (2%)     max: 2688 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 7913     avg: 9108     median: 9462 (3%)     max: 9948 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 6818     avg: 7570     median: 7729 (4%)     max: 8163 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
3DMark 06
min: 9971     avg: 12006     median: 12006 (16%)     max: 14041 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 5.7     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (2%)     max: 6.1 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 5716     avg: 7533     median: 6964 (5%)     max: 9920 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 28.92     avg: 40.1     median: 45.3 (16%)     max: 46 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 40.69     avg: 54.2     median: 58.6 (3%)     max: 58.91 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 72.1     avg: 88.4     median: 88.4 (1%)     max: 104.6 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
5.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 5031     avg: 5954     median: 6203.5 (2%)     max: 6378 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 6193     avg: 6857     median: 6978 (2%)     max: 7279 Points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 232     avg: 275     median: 275 (1%)     max: 318 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 728     avg: 748     median: 748 (1%)     max: 768 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1042     avg: 1099     median: 1098.5 (1%)     max: 1155 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17.8     avg: 21.7     median: 21.5 (3%)     max: 26.1 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 21.5     avg: 23.1     median: 23.1 (3%)     max: 24.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 26.6     avg: 27.4     median: 27.4 (6%)     max: 28.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.3 fps per Watt (24%)

Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
37  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
26.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
24  fps
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
16.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
11.9  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
10.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
7.7  fps
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
27.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
19.9  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
13  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
11.4  fps
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
11.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
6.4  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
5.3  fps
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
6.9 7.3 ~ 7 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
5.5  fps
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
16.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
14.8  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
11.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
11.1  fps
low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
14.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
11.2  fps
low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
27.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
21.1  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
15.9  fps
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
46  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
18.3  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
16.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
10.5  fps
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
35.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
18.8  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
14  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
8.7  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
21  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
11  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
10  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
9  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
16.5  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
9.2  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
8.6  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
32.5 39.2 41.3 44.1 ~ 39 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
13.5 13.7 15.2 17.2 ~ 15 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
11.5 13.4 13.5 13.8 ~ 13 fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
14.5  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
20 21 ~ 21 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
9 10 ~ 10 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
9 9 ~ 9 fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
8 8 ~ 8 fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
17.3 20.3 23.1 23.6 32.4 ~ 23 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
12.7 17 17.2 19.3 21.6 ~ 18 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
10.7 15.7 15.9 17.8 20.1 ~ 16 fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
14.2 18 18.7 20.3 ~ 18 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
8 9.3 9.7 10.6 ~ 9 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
5.3 6.5 6.9 7.3 ~ 7 fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
44.2 62.5 66.2 75.1 ~ 62 fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
31.5 43.8 51.3 51.7 ~ 45 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
24.1 25.1 28.4 31.2 ~ 27 fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
22.1 23.1 26.6 28.7 ~ 25 fps
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
16 38.1 38.7 ~ 31 fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
12 25.1 ~ 19 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
12.3 13 ~ 13 fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
5.4 5.5 7 ~ 6 fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
35.7 50.8 55.6 61.9 ~ 51 fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
30.5 46.4 52.8 ~ 43 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
9.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 32EUs:
4  fps
Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown3726.724
The Finals16.911.910.47.74
Total War Pharaoh27.119.91311.4
Counter-Strike 211.36.385.29
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty75.53
Diablo 416.114.811.711.1
The Witcher 3 v4.0014.111.2
GRID Legends27.321.115.9
F1 20214618.316.510.5
F1 202035.418.8148.7
Far Cry New Dawn2111109
Shadow of the Tomb Raider16.59.28.6
Strange Brigade39151314.5
Far Cry 5211098
X-Plane 11.11231816
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1897
Dota 2 Reborn62452725
The Witcher 33119136
GTA V51439.433.98
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
12
5
1
16
3

17


12








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 19:38:15

#0 checking url part for id 11607 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12292 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719941895 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:16:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.055s ... 0.055s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.055s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11607 +0.017s ... 0.072s

#8 got single benchmarks 11607 +0s ... 0.072s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12292 +0.004s ... 0.077s

#10 got single benchmarks 12292 +0.008s ... 0.084s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.084s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.1s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.1s

#14 Got 124 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.11s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.11s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.111s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.006s ... 0.117s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.117s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.119s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)