Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA T600 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 3500 Ada Generation is a higher-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 5,120 CUDA cores and 12 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM. Brought into existence in 2023, this graphics adapter leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve higher-than-average performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 60 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Hardware-wise, the RTX 3500 is a cut-down GeForce RTX 4070 Desktop, as far as we can tell. Consequently, both make use of the AD104 chip and have little difficulty running triple-A games at QHD 1440p.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with a different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gaming. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different wat to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 3500 Ada features 40 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 160 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 5,120 CUDA cores. Multiply those numbers by 1.15 and what you get looks exactly like a desktop RTX 4070: 46, 184 and 5,888, respectively. Elsewhere, the graphics card comes with 12 GB of 192-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for a very healthy throughput of ~432 GB/s. Error correction can be turned off if desired. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the RTX 3500 Ada is indeed targeted at professional users.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 3500 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring an RTX 3500 Ada Generation as of February 2024, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4070 Desktop, a graphics card that's about 20% superior to the RTX 3500 Ada Generation. Based on that, we fully expect the RTX 3500 to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 32 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 44,000
  • around 90 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • around 50 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 23 TFLOPS" of performance, a 15% improvement over 20 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 3000 Ada Generation.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 3500 is. One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is the case for the RTX 3500, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 60 W while the highest is more than two times higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 3500 Ada can easily be 60% slower than the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've been seeing on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 3500 is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

NVIDIA T600

► remove from comparison NVIDIA T600

The Nvidia T600 Desktop GPU is a professional graphics card for workstations that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). The desktop version only offers 640 of the 1024 cores and therefore also less than the T600 mobile (896 CUDA cores). The card offers 4 GB GDDR6 graphics memory connected with a 128 bit bus (up to 160 GB/s bandwidth). The T600 supports certified drivers (former Quadro line) for professional applications like CAD, 3D modelling, DCC, medicine, or visualization applications.

The maximum power consumption of the card is rated at 40W.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia Quadro T2000 for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer desktop GTX 1650 Ti with comparable clock speeds and therefore currently between a mobile GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC.

The GPU features 1024 shaders, 64 texture mapping units and 32 ROPs. The 4 GB GDDR5 memory is connected with a 128-bit memory interface and clocked at 2000 MHz. At a TGP of 60W, the clock speeds are specified from 1575 MHz (base) to 1785 MHz (boost).

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards (e.g. Quadro RTX 3000), the T1000 and T2000 don not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPUNVIDIA T600NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Quadro Turing Series
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTuringTuring
Pipelines5120 - unified640 - unified1024 - unified
Raytracing Cores40
Tensor / AI Cores160
Theoretical Performance23 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz10000 effective = 1250 MHz8000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB4 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynonono
Memory Bandwidth432 GB/s160 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.6, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)40 Watt60 Watt
technology5 nm12 nm12 nm
PCIe4.0 x163.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement21.03.2023 12.04.2021 27.05.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A3000 Laptop GPU
TMUs40
ROPs32
Core Speed735 - 1335 (Boost) MHz1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz
Transistors4.7 Billion4.7 Billion
Die Size 200 mm²
CodenameN19P-Q3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T600
3 pt (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
100%
1 T600 +
2496 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
2195 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
304731 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
152912 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
100%
1 T600 +
31922 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
40917 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
100%
1 T600 +
6284 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
6552 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
182459 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
100%
1 T600 +
9497 Points (13%)
min: 13150     avg: 13271     median: 13271 (18%)     max: 13392 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
100%
1 T600 +
8694 Points (7%)
min: 13370     avg: 13524     median: 13523.5 (12%)     max: 13677 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T600
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
100%
1 T600 +
344838 Points (100%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T600
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
100%
1 T600 +
30400 Points (17%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T600 +
46380 Points (51%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T600
3DMark 06
100%
1 T600 +
43997 Points (57%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
100%
1 T600 +
32.7 fps (11%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
100%
1 T600 +
115 fps (29%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
106 fps (26%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
100%
1 T600 +
68.6 fps (10%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
91.1 fps (13%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
100%
1 T600 +
35.3 fps (8%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
43.9 fps (10%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
100%
1 T600 +
19.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
100%
1 T600 +
67.4 fps (18%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
47.2 fps (13%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
100%
1 T600 +
5 fps (4%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
100%
1 T600 +
78.5 fps (31%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
101 fps (40%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
100%
1 T600 +
76.9 fps (13%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
101 fps (17%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
100%
1 T600 +
80 fps (14%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
111 fps (19%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
100%
1 T600 +
114 fps (31%)
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
111 fps (30%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
100%
1 T600 +
122 fps (14%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
167 fps (19%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
100%
1 T600 +
34.9 fps (8%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
42.7 fps (9%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
100%
1 T600 +
35.7 fps (7%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
100%
1 T600 +
99.8 fps (11%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
125 fps (14%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
100%
1 T600 +
12.6 fps (4%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
100%
1 T600 +
98 fps (14%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
120 fps (18%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
100%
1 T600 +
79.9 fps (14%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
111 fps (19%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
164 fps (18%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
100%
1 T600 +
16.9 fps (5%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
100%
1 T600 +
75.6 fps (8%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
100%
1 T600 +
4.5 fps (4%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
100%
1 T600 +
46.1 fps (8%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
100%
1 T600 +
6.7 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
100%
1 T600 +
32.3 fps (15%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
100%
1 T600 +
13.8 fps (9%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
100%
1 T600 +
19.4 fps (8%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T600
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
100%
1 T600 +
6830 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 T600 +
104.1 fps (36%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 T600 +
227.1 fps (13%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
203 fps (12%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
100%
1 T600 +
99.6 % (100%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
100%
1 T600 +
1121 Samples/s (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
100%
1 T600 +
2049 Samples/s (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
100%
1 T600 +
4825 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T600 +
76.7 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T600 +
83.5 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 T600 +
0.3 fps per Watt (27%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T600 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
T600:
93.5  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
44.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
21.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
6.3  fps
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
T600:
171.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
78.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
63.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
40.2  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
29.1  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
15.7  fps
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
T600:
150.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
73.1  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
55.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
38.6  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
27  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
14.5  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
107.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
42  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
26.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
19.9  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
13.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
5.5  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
74.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
34  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
24  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
19.4  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
14.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
8.5  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
T600:
174.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
64.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
51.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
44.8  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
31.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
17.9  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
T600:
95  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
46  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
42  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
39  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
26  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
12  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
132.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
107  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
95.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
40.8  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
70.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
34.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
25.1  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
17.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
10  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
162.8  fps
med. 1366x768
T600:
148.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
120.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
110.5  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
39.6  fps
low 1024x768
T600:
139.1  fps
med. 1366x768
T600:
82.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
47.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
27.2  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
16.1  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
T600:
181.5  fps
med. 1366x768
T600:
175.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
80.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
38.2  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
26.6  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
25  fps
NVIDIA T600lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Far Cry 693.544.621.36.33
F1 2021171.978.863.740.229.115.7
F1 2020150.473.155.538.62714.5
Borderlands 3107.64226.719.913.45.54
Metro Exodus74.6342419.414.88.47
Strange Brigade174.464.951.444.831.917.9
Far Cry 5954642392612
X-Plane 11.11132.810795.940.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark70.734.925.117.89.98
Dota 2 Reborn162.8148.6120.7110.539.6
The Witcher 3139.182.847.527.216.1
GTA V181.5175.680.338.226.625
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
7

5
5
2
4
4
3
1
4
5
1
7
1

9
2

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 02. 17:45:40

#0 checking url part for id 11605 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11373 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9858 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719935140 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:16:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11605 +0.009s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 11605 +0s ... 0.015s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11373 +0.002s ... 0.017s

#11 got single benchmarks 11373 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9858 +0s ... 0.018s

#13 got single benchmarks 9858 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.043s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.043s

#17 Got 65 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.047s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.047s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.048s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.052s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.052s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.052s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)