Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA T600 vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 3500 Ada Generation is a higher-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 5,120 CUDA cores and 12 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM. Brought into existence in 2023, this graphics adapter leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve higher-than-average performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 60 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Hardware-wise, the RTX 3500 is a cut-down GeForce RTX 4070 Desktop, as far as we can tell. Consequently, both make use of the AD104 chip and have little difficulty running triple-A games at QHD 1440p.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with a different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gaming. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different wat to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 3500 Ada features 40 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 160 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 5,120 CUDA cores. Multiply those numbers by 1.15 and what you get looks exactly like a desktop RTX 4070: 46, 184 and 5,888, respectively. Elsewhere, the graphics card comes with 12 GB of 192-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for a very healthy throughput of ~432 GB/s. Error correction can be turned off if desired. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the RTX 3500 Ada is indeed targeted at professional users.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 3500 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring an RTX 3500 Ada Generation as of February 2024, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4070 Desktop, a graphics card that's about 20% superior to the RTX 3500 Ada Generation. Based on that, we fully expect the RTX 3500 to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 32 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 44,000
  • around 90 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • around 50 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 23 TFLOPS" of performance, a 15% improvement over 20 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 3000 Ada Generation.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 3500 is. One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is the case for the RTX 3500, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 60 W while the highest is more than two times higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 3500 Ada can easily be 60% slower than the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've been seeing on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 3500 is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

NVIDIA T600

► remove from comparison NVIDIA T600

The Nvidia T600 Desktop GPU is a professional graphics card for workstations that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). The desktop version only offers 640 of the 1024 cores and therefore also less than the T600 mobile (896 CUDA cores). The card offers 4 GB GDDR6 graphics memory connected with a 128 bit bus (up to 160 GB/s bandwidth). The T600 supports certified drivers (former Quadro line) for professional applications like CAD, 3D modelling, DCC, medicine, or visualization applications.

The maximum power consumption of the card is rated at 40W.

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 3000 Ada Generation, not to be confused with the A3000, P3000 or RTX 3000 Turing Generation, is a higher-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 4,608 CUDA cores and 8 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM (error correction can be turned off if desired). It would be fair to say that this is a GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop in disguise; consequently, the graphics card is fast enough for many games at 1440p with quality set to High. Brought into existence in 2023, the RTX 3000 leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve very decent performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 35 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional use rather than gaming. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a smarter technique is used to determine what is transparent and what isn't), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 3000 Ada features 36 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 144 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 4,608 CUDA cores, making it ~11% inferior to the RTX 3500 Ada Generation as long as we disregard clock speed differences. (The 3500 also has more VRAM). The RTX 3000 comes with 8 GB of 128-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for throughput of ~256 GB/s. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the graphics adapter is indeed targeted at professional users, and it can be disabled if desired.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 3000 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs can potentially prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

Having reviewed the Dell Precision 5480 and its 50 W RTX 3000 Ada in September 2023, we can firmly say the graphics card is in the same league as the RTX 4060 Laptop and the RTX 4050 Laptop, despite sharing most of its specifications with the RTX 4070 Laptop. 48 seconds in the Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA test and a 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score of less than 30,000 points are nothing to write home about. The GPU's gaming talents are not mind-blowing, either, although it is certainly capable enough for 1080p gaming.

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 20 TFLOPS" of performance, a very noticeable improvement over 14.5 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 2000 Ada Generation. Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the graphics card is. A 100 W RTX 3000 Ada might be able to come close to the average RTX 4070 Laptop.

One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is especially the case for the RTX 3000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 35 W while the highest is 300% higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). This is the kind of delta that we've be seeing on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 3000 Ada is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPUNVIDIA T600NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTuringAda Lovelace
Pipelines5120 - unified640 - unified4608 - unified
Raytracing Cores4036
Tensor / AI Cores160144
Theoretical Performance23 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz10000 effective = 1250 MHz16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB4 GB8 GB
Shared Memorynonono
Memory Bandwidth432 GB/s160 GB/s256 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.6, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)40 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm12 nm5 nm
PCIe4.0 x163.0 x164.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2023 12.04.2021 21.03.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.comimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A3000 Laptop GPUQuadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
TMUs40144
ROPs3248
Core Speed735 - 1335 (Boost) MHz
Transistors4.7 Billion
Die Size 200 mm²
CacheL2: 32 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T600
3 pt (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
100%
1 T600 +
2496 Points (7%)
min: 8254     avg: 8533     median: 8532.5 (25%)     max: 8811 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
2195 Points (6%)
min: 7959     avg: 8155     median: 8155 (22%)     max: 8351 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
304731 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
152912 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
100%
1 T600 +
31922 Points (34%)
45774 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
40917 Points (11%)
82612 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
100%
1 T600 +
6284 Points (11%)
min: 18368     avg: 18608     median: 18607.5 (33%)     max: 18847 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
6552 Points (7%)
min: 20233     avg: 20571     median: 20570.5 (23%)     max: 20908 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
100%
1 T600 +
182459 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
100%
1 T600 +
9497 Points (13%)
min: 25317     avg: 26200     median: 26200 (36%)     max: 27083 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
100%
1 T600 +
8694 Points (7%)
min: 28283     avg: 28847     median: 28847 (25%)     max: 29411 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T600
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
100%
1 T600 +
344838 Points (100%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T600
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
100%
1 T600 +
30400 Points (17%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T600 +
46380 Points (51%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T600
3DMark 06
100%
1 T600 +
43997 Points (57%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
100%
1 T600 +
32.7 fps (11%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 44     avg: 46     median: 46 (7%)     max: 48 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 27     avg: 27.5     median: 27.5 (10%)     max: 28 Seconds
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
100%
1 T600 +
115 fps (29%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 159.9     avg: 171.9     median: 171.9 (43%)     max: 183.9 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
100%
1 T600 +
68.6 fps (10%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 163.39     avg: 169.1     median: 169.1 (25%)     max: 174.85 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
100%
1 T600 +
35.3 fps (8%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 88.34     avg: 90.2     median: 90.2 (20%)     max: 91.96 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
100%
1 T600 +
19.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
100%
1 T600 +
67.4 fps (18%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 133.1     avg: 138     median: 138 (38%)     max: 142.99 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
100%
1 T600 +
5 fps (4%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
100%
1 T600 +
78.5 fps (31%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 123.21     avg: 136.8     median: 136.8 (55%)     max: 150.32 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
100%
1 T600 +
76.9 fps (13%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 174.33     avg: 186.4     median: 186.4 (31%)     max: 198.45 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
100%
1 T600 +
80 fps (14%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
100%
1 T600 +
114 fps (31%)
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 162.23     avg: 170.7     median: 170.7 (46%)     max: 179.23 fps
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
100%
1 T600 +
122 fps (14%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 296.88     avg: 304.5     median: 304.5 (34%)     max: 312.07 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
100%
1 T600 +
34.9 fps (8%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 88.94     avg: 89.8     median: 89.8 (20%)     max: 90.72 fps
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
100%
1 T600 +
35.7 fps (7%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 111.4     avg: 139.9     median: 139.9 (29%)     max: 168.45 fps
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
100%
1 T600 +
99.8 fps (11%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 260.1     avg: 267.3     median: 267.3 (30%)     max: 274.54 fps
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
100%
1 T600 +
12.6 fps (4%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 56.97     avg: 57.7     median: 57.7 (19%)     max: 58.34 fps
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
100%
1 T600 +
98 fps (14%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 245.25     avg: 250.2     median: 250.2 (37%)     max: 255.24 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
100%
1 T600 +
79.9 fps (14%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 189.32     avg: 190.5     median: 190.5 (33%)     max: 191.68 fps
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 273.29     avg: 292     median: 292 (32%)     max: 310.7 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
100%
1 T600 +
16.9 fps (5%)
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
77.2 fps (23%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
100%
1 T600 +
75.6 fps (8%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 189.79     avg: 190.6     median: 190.6 (20%)     max: 191.49 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
100%
1 T600 +
4.5 fps (4%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 19.91     avg: 28.2     median: 28.2 (27%)     max: 36.49 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
100%
1 T600 +
46.1 fps (8%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 138.82     avg: 139.8     median: 139.8 (23%)     max: 140.78 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
100%
1 T600 +
6.7 fps (1%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 20     avg: 30.6     median: 30.6 (7%)     max: 41.16 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
100%
1 T600 +
32.3 fps (15%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 51.74     avg: 63.3     median: 63.3 (30%)     max: 74.79 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
100%
1 T600 +
13.8 fps (9%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 44.93     avg: 45.1     median: 45.1 (29%)     max: 45.26 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
100%
1 T600 +
19.4 fps (8%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 51.62     avg: 52.3     median: 52.3 (22%)     max: 53 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k
77.9 fps (23%)
specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p
193.6 fps (52%)
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
196.5 fps (38%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 290.6     avg: 302.5     median: 302.5 (49%)     max: 314.39 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 55.19     avg: 76.1     median: 76.1 (54%)     max: 96.95 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 310.86     avg: 312.6     median: 312.6 (46%)     max: 314.35 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 57.2     avg: 57.5     median: 57.5 (46%)     max: 57.85 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 113.79     avg: 125.2     median: 125.2 (62%)     max: 136.69 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 78.93     avg: 81.4     median: 81.4 (52%)     max: 83.77 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 80.93     avg: 83.6     median: 83.6 (38%)     max: 86.19 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T600
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
100%
1 T600 +
6830 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 T600 +
104.1 fps (36%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 T600 +
227.1 fps (13%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
min: 235     avg: 261.5     median: 261.5 (15%)     max: 288 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
100%
1 T600 +
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 900     avg: 903     median: 902.5 (6%)     max: 905 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 91678     avg: 92046     median: 92045.5 (27%)     max: 92413 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 88420     avg: 90522     median: 90521.5 (30%)     max: 92623 Points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
100%
1 T600 +
1121 Samples/s (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
100%
1 T600 +
2049 Samples/s (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
100%
1 T600 +
4825 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T600 +
76.7 Watt (11%)
79.8 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T600 +
83.5 Watt (12%)
86.5 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 90.4     avg: 91.8     median: 91.8 (20%)     max: 93.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.854     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (78%)     max: 0.871 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 T600 +
0.3 fps per Watt (27%)
0.9 fps per Watt (75%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 49.9     avg: 50     median: 50 (80%)     max: 50.1 dB(A)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T600 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
87.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
72.7  fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
60.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
52.1  fps
low 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
92  fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
78.8  fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
70.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
68.8  fps
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
162.7 183.6 ~ 173 fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
159.6 168 ~ 164 fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
127.5 133.4 ~ 130 fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
50.4 51.1 ~ 51 fps
low 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
153.9 156 ~ 155 fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
125.4 131.4 ~ 128 fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
88 88.5 ~ 88 fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
69 70.2 ~ 70 fps
low 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
92.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
72.4  fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
61.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
56.2  fps
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
T600:
93.5  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
44.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
21.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
6.3  fps
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
T600:
171.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
78.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
63.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
40.2  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
29.1  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
15.7  fps
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
T600:
150.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
73.1  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
55.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
38.6  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
27  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
14.5  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
107.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
42  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
26.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
19.9  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
13.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
5.5  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
74.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
34  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
24  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
19.4  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
14.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
8.5  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
T600:
174.4  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
282 400 ~ 341 fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
64.9  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
182.4 191.3 ~ 187 fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
51.4  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
151.4 160.1 ~ 156 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
44.8  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
132.5 140.7 ~ 137 fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
31.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
17.9  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
T600:
95  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
115 155 ~ 135 fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
46  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
105 116 ~ 111 fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
42  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
104 106 ~ 105 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
39  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
96 101 ~ 99 fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
26  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
12  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
132.8  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
109.9 152 ~ 131 fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
107  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
102.1 126.8 ~ 114 fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
95.9  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
76.7 102 ~ 89 fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
40.8  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
70.7  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
128.8 155.1 ~ 142 fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
34.9  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
91.9 108 ~ 100 fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
25.1  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
72.9 78.9 ~ 76 fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
17.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
10  fps
low 1280x720
T600:
162.8  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
168 175.7 ~ 172 fps
med. 1366x768
T600:
148.6  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
151.3 160.8 ~ 156 fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
120.7  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
136 151.5 ~ 144 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
110.5  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
123.3 142.9 ~ 133 fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
39.6  fps
low 1024x768
T600:
139.1  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
344 364.1 ~ 354 fps
med. 1366x768
T600:
82.8  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
242.5 249.5 ~ 246 fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
47.5  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
145.8 150.1 ~ 148 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
27.2  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
78.7 79.5 ~ 79 fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
16.1  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
T600:
181.5  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
183.2  fps
med. 1366x768
T600:
175.6  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
177  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
80.3  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
164.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
38.2  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
88.2  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
26.6  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
25  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty87.272.760.752.1
Baldur's Gate 39278.870.168.8
F1 2217316413051
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands1551288870
Cyberpunk 2077 1.692.372.461.256.2
Strange Brigade341187156137
Far Cry 513511110599
X-Plane 11.1113111489
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark14210076
Dota 2 Reborn172156144133
The Witcher 335424614879
GTA V183.2177164.188.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
9


6
6


7
5

3
5
2






NVIDIA T600lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Far Cry 693.544.621.36.33
F1 2021171.978.863.740.229.115.7
F1 2020150.473.155.538.62714.5
Borderlands 3107.64226.719.913.45.54
Metro Exodus74.6342419.414.88.47
Strange Brigade174.464.951.444.831.917.9
Far Cry 5954642392612
X-Plane 11.11132.810795.940.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark70.734.925.117.89.98
Dota 2 Reborn162.8148.6120.7110.539.6
The Witcher 3139.182.847.527.216.1
GTA V181.5175.680.338.226.625
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
7

5
5
2
4
4
3
1
4
5
1
7
1

9
2

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 02. 17:21:02

#0 checking url part for id 11605 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11373 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11603 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719933661 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:16:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.059s ... 0.059s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.059s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.059s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11605 +0.028s ... 0.088s

#9 got single benchmarks 11605 +0s ... 0.088s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11373 +0.004s ... 0.092s

#11 got single benchmarks 11373 +0.005s ... 0.097s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11603 +0s ... 0.097s

#13 got single benchmarks 11603 +0.006s ... 0.103s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.103s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.154s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.154s

#17 Got 141 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.163s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.163s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.164s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.006s ... 0.17s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.17s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.17s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)