Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 3500 Ada Generation is a higher-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 5,120 CUDA cores and 12 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM. Brought into existence in 2023, this graphics adapter leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve higher-than-average performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 60 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Hardware-wise, the RTX 3500 is a cut-down GeForce RTX 4070 Desktop, as far as we can tell. Consequently, both make use of the AD104 chip and have little difficulty running triple-A games at QHD 1440p.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with a different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gaming. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different wat to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 3500 Ada features 40 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 160 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 5,120 CUDA cores. Multiply those numbers by 1.15 and what you get looks exactly like a desktop RTX 4070: 46, 184 and 5,888, respectively. Elsewhere, the graphics card comes with 12 GB of 192-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for a very healthy throughput of ~432 GB/s. Error correction can be turned off if desired. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the RTX 3500 Ada is indeed targeted at professional users.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 3500 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring an RTX 3500 Ada Generation as of February 2024, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4070 Desktop, a graphics card that's about 20% superior to the RTX 3500 Ada Generation. Based on that, we fully expect the RTX 3500 to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 32 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 44,000
  • around 90 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • around 50 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 23 TFLOPS" of performance, a 15% improvement over 20 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 3000 Ada Generation.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 3500 is. One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is the case for the RTX 3500, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 60 W while the highest is more than two times higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 3500 Ada can easily be 60% slower than the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've been seeing on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 3500 is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU

The Nvidia T600 Laptop GPU (or Quadro T600 for laptops) is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is similar to the consumer GTX 1650 with 896 CUDA cores and a 128 Bit memory bus for GDDR6 graphics memory (10 Gbits). The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. The T600 was introduced as a refresh together with the T1200 and should be slightly slower than the older Quadro T1000 (2.6 versus 2.5 TFLOPS peak SP performance).

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games.

Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T600 do not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

Currently Nvidia only specifies the TDP of 25 Watt (the older T1000 had a TGP of 40-50 Watt). Therefore, the T600 should be well suited for thin and light laptops.

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPUNVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
Quadro Turing Series
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTuring
Pipelines5120 - unified896 - unified
Raytracing Cores40
Tensor / AI Cores160
Theoretical Performance23 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz10000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
Memory Bandwidth432 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)40 Watt
technology5 nm12 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement21.03.2023 12.04.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A3000 Laptop GPU
Core Speed1400 (Boost) MHz
Features2.5 TFLOPS SP max. performance, DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, PCIe 4.0 x8, 160 GB/s memory bandwidth

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T600 Laptop GPU
3.6 pt (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
3075 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2766 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
35278 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
53941 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
7475 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
7928 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
75124 Points (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
10973 Points (15%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
10498 Points (9%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
39112 Points (11%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
34680 Points (20%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
3DMark 06
43438 Points (57%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
106 fps (28%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
137 fps (15%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
41.4 fps (9%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
42.6 fps (9%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
110 fps (12%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
16.1 fps (5%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
110 fps (16%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
130 fps (14%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
89.8 fps (16%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
73.4 fps (14%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
136 fps (22%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
18.7 fps (13%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
125 fps (18%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
16 fps (13%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
67.3 fps (33%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
33.1 fps (21%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
40.9 fps (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
162.3 fps (56%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
268 fps (16%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
62.7 fps (11%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
162.2 fps (12%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
156.5 fps (18%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
585 fps (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1166 Samples/s (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
2200 Samples/s (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
5694 Points (6%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
54.7 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
60.6 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
62.3 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.4 fps per Watt (40%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.5 fps per Watt (38%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
46.6 dB(A) (75%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
119  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
64.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
61.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
60.1  fps
low 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
45.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
44.3  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
43.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
41.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
57.5  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
48.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
27.2  fps
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
low 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
38.5  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
35.7  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
30.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
26.9  fps
low 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
104.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
71  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
57.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
41.9  fps
low 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
52.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
45  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
39  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
29.9  fps
low 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
31.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
23  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
18.3  fps
low 1280x720
T600 Laptop GPU:
175.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
87.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
63.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
53.9  fps
low 1280x720
T600 Laptop GPU:
91  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
52  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
39  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
30  fps
Deathloop

Deathloop

2021
low 1280x720
T600 Laptop GPU:
68.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
34.4  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
28.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
25.2  fps
low 1280x720
T600 Laptop GPU:
113.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
58.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
52.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
44  fps
low 1280x720
T600 Laptop GPU:
72  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
45  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
36  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
31  fps
low 1280x720
T600 Laptop GPU:
83.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
40.4  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
34.9  fps
low 1280x720
T600 Laptop GPU:
98  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
53  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
42  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
36  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
T600 Laptop GPU:
190.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
76.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
60.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
52.7  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
T600 Laptop GPU:
105  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
53  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
49  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
45  fps
low 1280x720
T600 Laptop GPU:
107.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
92.4  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
77  fps
low 1280x720
T600 Laptop GPU:
86  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
43.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
31  fps
low 1280x720
T600 Laptop GPU:
149.4  fps
med. 1366x768
T600 Laptop GPU:
127.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
115.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
107.1  fps
low 1024x768
T600 Laptop GPU:
158.6  fps
med. 1366x768
T600 Laptop GPU:
92.7  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
52.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
27.6  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
T600 Laptop GPU:
142.6  fps
med. 1366x768
T600 Laptop GPU:
137.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
82.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600 Laptop GPU:
44.1  fps
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Vampire Bloodhunt11964.561.860.1
Ghostwire Tokyo45.744.343.941.8
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands57.532.848.327.2
Elex 238.535.730.526.9
GRID Legends104.17157.741.9
Elden Ring52.4453929.9
Dying Light 231.72318.3
Farming Simulator 22175.487.563.553.9
Riders Republic91523930
Deathloop68.934.428.425.2
Resident Evil Village113.658.652.144
Immortals Fenyx Rising72453631
Mafia Definitive Edition83.640.434.9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider98534236
Strange Brigade190.476.260.752.7
Far Cry 5105534945
X-Plane 11.11107.992.477
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark8643.931
Dota 2 Reborn149.4127.6115.8107.1
The Witcher 3158.692.752.227.6
GTA V142.6137.682.344.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

5
11
5
1
12
6
2
2
13
6
5
10
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 30. 20:01:01

#0 checking url part for id 11605 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10685 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719770461 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.038s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.038s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11605 +0.024s ... 0.061s

#8 got single benchmarks 11605 +0s ... 0.062s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10685 +0.004s ... 0.066s

#10 got single benchmarks 10685 +0.006s ... 0.072s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.096s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.096s

#14 Got 80 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.101s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.101s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.102s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.008s ... 0.111s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.111s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.113s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)