Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 3500 Ada Generation is a higher-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 5,120 CUDA cores and 12 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM. Brought into existence in 2023, this graphics adapter leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve higher-than-average performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 60 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Hardware-wise, the RTX 3500 is a cut-down GeForce RTX 4070 Desktop, as far as we can tell. Consequently, both make use of the AD104 chip and have little difficulty running triple-A games at QHD 1440p.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with a different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gaming. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different wat to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 3500 Ada features 40 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 160 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 5,120 CUDA cores. Multiply those numbers by 1.15 and what you get looks exactly like a desktop RTX 4070: 46, 184 and 5,888, respectively. Elsewhere, the graphics card comes with 12 GB of 192-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for a very healthy throughput of ~432 GB/s. Error correction can be turned off if desired. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the RTX 3500 Ada is indeed targeted at professional users.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 3500 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring an RTX 3500 Ada Generation as of February 2024, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4070 Desktop, a graphics card that's about 20% superior to the RTX 3500 Ada Generation. Based on that, we fully expect the RTX 3500 to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 32 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 44,000
  • around 90 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • around 50 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 23 TFLOPS" of performance, a 15% improvement over 20 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 3000 Ada Generation.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 3500 is. One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is the case for the RTX 3500, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 60 W while the highest is more than two times higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 3500 Ada can easily be 60% slower than the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've been seeing on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 3500 is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU

The Nvidia T550 Laptop GPU (formerly known as Quadro T550 Mobile) for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer GeForce MX550 and features the same 1024 cores and a 64 Bit memory bus. The card offers 4 GB GDDR6 with a maximum bandwidth of 112 GB/s and no dedicated display outputs (iGPU display outputs used via Optimus). The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. 

The professional GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T550 does not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPUNVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
Quadro Turing Series
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTuring
Pipelines5120 - unified1024 - unified
Raytracing Cores40
Tensor / AI Cores160
Theoretical Performance23 TFLOPS FP327.2 TFLOPS FP16, 3.7 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz12000 effective = 1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5, GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
Memory Bandwidth432 GB/s112 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)25 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm12 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement21.03.2023 27.05.2022
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.comnvdam.widen.net
PredecessorRTX A3000 Laptop GPU
CodenameTU117
Core Speed1065 - 1665 (Boost) MHz
InformationOptimus only

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2031     avg: 2187     median: 2066 (6%)     max: 2465 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1882     avg: 2021     median: 1928 (5%)     max: 2252 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 17399     avg: 17614     median: 17614 (19%)     max: 17829 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 32743     avg: 33219     median: 33218.5 (9%)     max: 33694 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4559     avg: 4786     median: 4581 (8%)     max: 5218 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4816     avg: 5100     median: 4890 (6%)     max: 5593 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3530     avg: 3590     median: 3589.5 (4%)     max: 3649 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7405     avg: 8160     median: 8160 (11%)     max: 8915 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7432     avg: 8067     median: 8066.5 (7%)     max: 8701 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
25155 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24697 Points (14%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
3DMark 06
31003 Points (41%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 278     avg: 282     median: 283 (42%)     max: 285 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 256     avg: 263.3     median: 265 (99%)     max: 269 Seconds
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 95     avg: 98.8     median: 95.8 (26%)     max: 105.68 fps
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 95.8     avg: 101.7     median: 99.7 (11%)     max: 109.67 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 24.8     avg: 26.1     median: 25.3 (6%)     max: 28.06 fps
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 34.5     avg: 37.2     median: 36.2 (8%)     max: 40.74 fps
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 77.5     avg: 82     median: 80.9 (9%)     max: 87.57 fps
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 11.7     avg: 12.4     median: 12 (4%)     max: 13.37 fps
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 82.4     avg: 86.2     median: 85.5 (13%)     max: 90.66 fps
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 104     avg: 110.4     median: 109 (12%)     max: 118.22 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 61.6     avg: 63.7     median: 63 (11%)     max: 66.38 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 46.3     avg: 54     median: 54.3 (11%)     max: 61.38 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 84     avg: 99.4     median: 99.3 (16%)     max: 114.82 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 13.5     avg: 15.6     median: 15.4 (11%)     max: 17.87 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 86.9     avg: 98.2     median: 98.1 (14%)     max: 109.68 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 10.6     avg: 12.1     median: 12 (10%)     max: 13.56 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 44.5     avg: 46.2     median: 45.7 (23%)     max: 48.5 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 22.4     avg: 25.6     median: 24.9 (16%)     max: 29.58 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 28.3     avg: 30     median: 29.6 (13%)     max: 32.03 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 184.9     avg: 193     median: 189.2 (11%)     max: 205 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
19 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
43.5 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
118.3 fps (13%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
172.6 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
229.9 fps (13%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
449.9 fps (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
5190 Points (6%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34.2     avg: 34.7     median: 34.7 (5%)     max: 35.1 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.2     avg: 41.3     median: 41.3 (6%)     max: 41.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 42.9     avg: 44.1     median: 44.1 (10%)     max: 45.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4393     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (40%)     max: 0.4569 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4734     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (40%)     max: 0.483 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 38.2     avg: 40.4     median: 40.5 (65%)     max: 42.5 dB(A)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
66.4 69.6 69.9 ~ 69 fps
med. 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
59.9 62 63 ~ 62 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
41.4 43.3 44.6 ~ 43 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
29.5 31 33.4 ~ 31 fps
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
T550 Laptop GPU:
151.1 152.7 156.6 ~ 153 fps
med. 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
70.7 74.4 75.4 ~ 74 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
56.5 59.5 59.9 ~ 59 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
36.1 36.8 37 ~ 37 fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
T550 Laptop GPU:
126.1 128 139 ~ 131 fps
med. 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
47.7 51 56 ~ 52 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
38.7 42 44 ~ 42 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
33.2 36 38 ~ 36 fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
T550 Laptop GPU:
75  fps
med. 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
41  fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
38  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
35  fps
low 1280x720
T550 Laptop GPU:
65.5 68.1 77.4 ~ 70 fps
med. 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
59.4 64.1 65.4 ~ 63 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
55.5 57 58.8 ~ 57 fps
low 1280x720
T550 Laptop GPU:
60.2 60.7 65.7 ~ 62 fps
med. 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
30.5 30.5 31.2 ~ 31 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
22 22.2 22.3 ~ 22 fps
low 1280x720
T550 Laptop GPU:
111.4 113.3 126 ~ 117 fps
med. 1366x768
T550 Laptop GPU:
100.3 103.8 110.1 ~ 105 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
92.1 92.3 101.2 ~ 95 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
84 85.2 93.4 ~ 88 fps
low 1024x768
T550 Laptop GPU:
121 123 139 ~ 128 fps
med. 1366x768
T550 Laptop GPU:
73 75 78 ~ 75 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
39 40 43 ~ 41 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
19.6 19.9 23.2 ~ 21 fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
T550 Laptop GPU:
106.2 116 127.2 ~ 116 fps
med. 1366x768
T550 Laptop GPU:
103.3 117.2 120.6 ~ 114 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
61.5 61.6 63.9 ~ 62 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
29 29.2 29.6 ~ 29 fps
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2269624331
F1 2021153745937
Strange Brigade131524236
Far Cry 575413835
X-Plane 11.11706357
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark623122
Dota 2 Reborn1171059588
The Witcher 3128754121
GTA V1161146229
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


6
3

3
6
1
6
2
2
4
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 19:44:15

#0 checking url part for id 11605 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11429 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720115055 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11605 +0.017s ... 0.047s

#8 got single benchmarks 11605 +0s ... 0.047s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11429 +0s ... 0.047s

#10 got single benchmarks 11429 +0.007s ... 0.054s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.074s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.074s

#14 Got 94 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.079s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.079s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.08s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.083s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.083s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.085s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)