Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 3500 Ada Generation is a higher-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 5,120 CUDA cores and 12 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM. Brought into existence in 2023, this graphics adapter leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve higher-than-average performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 60 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Hardware-wise, the RTX 3500 is a cut-down GeForce RTX 4070 Desktop, as far as we can tell. Consequently, both make use of the AD104 chip and have little difficulty running triple-A games at QHD 1440p.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with a different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gaming. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different wat to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 3500 Ada features 40 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 160 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 5,120 CUDA cores. Multiply those numbers by 1.15 and what you get looks exactly like a desktop RTX 4070: 46, 184 and 5,888, respectively. Elsewhere, the graphics card comes with 12 GB of 192-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for a very healthy throughput of ~432 GB/s. Error correction can be turned off if desired. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the RTX 3500 Ada is indeed targeted at professional users.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 3500 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring an RTX 3500 Ada Generation as of February 2024, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4070 Desktop, a graphics card that's about 20% superior to the RTX 3500 Ada Generation. Based on that, we fully expect the RTX 3500 to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 32 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 44,000
  • around 90 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • around 50 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 23 TFLOPS" of performance, a 15% improvement over 20 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 3000 Ada Generation.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 3500 is. One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is the case for the RTX 3500, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 60 W while the highest is more than two times higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 3500 Ada can easily be 60% slower than the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've been seeing on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 3500 is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000 for laptops is a professional high-end graphics card for big and powerful laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the same TU106 chip as the consumer GeForce RTX 2070 (mobile) but with reduced shaders, clock speeds and memory bandwidth. 

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

VarianteShaderTGP (W)Base (MHz)Boost (MHz)
Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop230416010051545
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile1920809451380
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q1920708701380
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2304657651305
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2304606001215
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile2304115?12151440

Features

NVIDIA manufacturers the TU106 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games support it). The Quadro RTX 3000 is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).

Performance

In professional applications, the Quadro RTX 3000 can be faster GeForce RTX 2070 due to the optimized drivers and bigger VRAM.

The high power consumption of the RTX3000 makes the card most suited for big and heavy laptops. The slower Max-Q variant is intended for thinner laptops.

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPUNVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
Quadro Turing Series
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTuring
Pipelines5120 - unified1920 - unified
Raytracing Cores40
Tensor / AI Cores160
Theoretical Performance23 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB6 GB
Shared Memorynono
Memory Bandwidth432 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)80 Watt
technology5 nm12 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2023 27.05.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A3000 Laptop GPU
CodenameN19E-Q1
Core Speed945 - 1380 (Boost) MHz
Transistors10.8 Billion
FeaturesDLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
6.8 pt (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 5566     avg: 5856     median: 5923 (17%)     max: 6080 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 5503     avg: 5702     median: 5589 (15%)     max: 6014 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
140064 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 32163     avg: 35433     median: 36407 (39%)     max: 37729 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 62730     avg: 86865     median: 91394 (24%)     max: 106470 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 12693     avg: 13568     median: 13570 (24%)     max: 14442 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 13802     avg: 14842     median: 14841.5 (17%)     max: 15881 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
123598 Points (15%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 15944     avg: 17495     median: 17864 (25%)     max: 18307 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 17569     avg: 19467     median: 19878.5 (17%)     max: 20542 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
50309 Points (15%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
54830 Points (31%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
3DMark 06
37304 Points (49%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
58.3 fps (19%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
199.4 fps (37%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 107     avg: 112.1     median: 110.6 (27%)     max: 120.2 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 99.6     avg: 112.7     median: 113.5 (17%)     max: 124.3 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 76.9     avg: 81     median: 82 (18%)     max: 83.2 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 43.01     avg: 46     median: 46 (12%)     max: 49 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 72.4     avg: 78.2     median: 73.8 (20%)     max: 92.9 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 11.54     avg: 11.8     median: 11.8 (11%)     max: 12.13 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 113.6     avg: 118.2     median: 119.1 (48%)     max: 121 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 108.8     avg: 117.5     median: 115.5 (19%)     max: 130 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 151     avg: 157.3     median: 158 (28%)     max: 163 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 109.6     avg: 120.2     median: 121.6 (33%)     max: 128 fps
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 160.6     avg: 204.3     median: 215.5 (24%)     max: 225.4 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 73.3     avg: 79.3     median: 80.8 (18%)     max: 82.5 fps
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 53.9     avg: 59.8     median: 59.8 (12%)     max: 65.6 fps
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 155.4     avg: 182.3     median: 189.5 (22%)     max: 194.7 fps
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 25.76     avg: 28.2     median: 28.2 (9%)     max: 30.55 fps
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 160.6     avg: 182.5     median: 186.5 (27%)     max: 196.2 fps
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 185.8     avg: 199     median: 202.5 (23%)     max: 205.2 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 149.4     avg: 156.7     median: 157.5 (27%)     max: 162.5 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6821 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
129.2 fps (45%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 192.4     avg: 203.6     median: 204 (12%)     max: 214 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 99.6     avg: 99.8     median: 99.8 (100%)     max: 100 %
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
257.8 fps (29%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
384.8 fps (8%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
407.8 fps (24%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
1010 fps (8%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
2754 Samples/s (12%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
5769 Samples/s (10%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
8716 Points (9%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 135.5     avg: 143.8     median: 143 (31%)     max: 153 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3523     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (36%)     max: 0.4354 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 30.7     avg: 38.9     median: 41.2 (66%)     max: 44.7 dB(A)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
102  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
92  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
84  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
73  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
226.5  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
107.7  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
69.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
46  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
114  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
91  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
86  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
77  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
96  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
77  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
62  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
39  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
135  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
100  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
88  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
79  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
114  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
102  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
86  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
219.1  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
213.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
174.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
99.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
83  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
142  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
130  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
132  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
121  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
88  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
274.9 303.2 ~ 289 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
182.7 202.8 ~ 193 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
101.3 117 ~ 109 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
53.9 59 ~ 56 fps
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
325.9 349.5 ~ 338 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
288.2 294.1 ~ 291 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
266.8 275.2 ~ 271 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
140.3 148.4 ~ 144 fps
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2019102928473
Total War: Three Kingdoms226.5107.769.246
Far Cry New Dawn114918677
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey96776239
Shadow of the Tomb Raider1351008879
X-Plane 11.1111410286
Rocket League219.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider213.9174.699.483
Dota 2 Reborn14213013212188
The Witcher 328919310956
BioShock Infinite338291271144
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4
6


6
4


8
3

3
4
2





1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 20:08:26

#0 checking url part for id 11605 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9854 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720116506 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11605 +0.018s ... 0.05s

#8 got single benchmarks 11605 +0s ... 0.05s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9854 +0.004s ... 0.054s

#10 got single benchmarks 9854 +0.007s ... 0.061s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.082s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.082s

#14 Got 49 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.086s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.086s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.086s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.09s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.09s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.092s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)