Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 3500 Ada Generation is a higher-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 5,120 CUDA cores and 12 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM. Brought into existence in 2023, this graphics adapter leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve higher-than-average performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 60 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Hardware-wise, the RTX 3500 is a cut-down GeForce RTX 4070 Desktop, as far as we can tell. Consequently, both make use of the AD104 chip and have little difficulty running triple-A games at QHD 1440p.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with a different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gaming. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different wat to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 3500 Ada features 40 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 160 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 5,120 CUDA cores. Multiply those numbers by 1.15 and what you get looks exactly like a desktop RTX 4070: 46, 184 and 5,888, respectively. Elsewhere, the graphics card comes with 12 GB of 192-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for a very healthy throughput of ~432 GB/s. Error correction can be turned off if desired. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the RTX 3500 Ada is indeed targeted at professional users.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 3500 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring an RTX 3500 Ada Generation as of February 2024, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4070 Desktop, a graphics card that's about 20% superior to the RTX 3500 Ada Generation. Based on that, we fully expect the RTX 3500 to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 32 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 44,000
  • around 90 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • around 50 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 23 TFLOPS" of performance, a 15% improvement over 20 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 3000 Ada Generation.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 3500 is. One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is the case for the RTX 3500, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 60 W while the highest is more than two times higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 3500 Ada can easily be 60% slower than the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've been seeing on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 3500 is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 1000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably the same chip like the consumer GeForce GT 540M). Compared to the 5010M, the 1000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations. According to the clock rates, the Quadro 1000M should be positioned between the GT 540M and 550M.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 1000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 1000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 1000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).

The Quadro 1000M is specified at 45 Watt TDP and therefore suited for 15.6" laptops.

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPUNVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Quadro M Series
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureAda LovelaceFermi
Pipelines5120 - unified96 - unified
Raytracing Cores40
Tensor / AI Cores160
Theoretical Performance23 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz900 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB2048 MB
Shared Memorynono
Memory Bandwidth432 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Power Consumption115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)45 Watt
technology5 nm40 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement21.03.2023 22.02.2011
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A3000 Laptop GPU
CodenameFermi
Core Speed700 MHz
Shader Speed1400 MHz
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1064 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
943 Points (1%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
4566 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
3679 Points (2%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
40779 Points (42%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
21603 Points (11%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
16583 Points (18%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3DMark 06
min: 7827     avg: 8312     median: 8509 (11%)     max: 8599 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
10.1 fps (2%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
13.3 fps (8%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
16.2 fps (9%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
25 fps (19%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
8.3 fps (10%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
33.5 fps (25%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
36 fps (39%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
11.2 fps (5%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
15 fps (8%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6771 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
26.2 fps (9%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 1000M → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
Quadro 1000M:
140.5  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 1000M:
54  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 1000M:
34.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 1000M:
12.7  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
Quadro 1000M:
450  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 1000M:
192  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 1000M:
132  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 1000M:
73  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
Quadro 1000M:
64.2  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 1000M:
50.3  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 1000M:
41.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 1000M:
25.1  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
Quadro 1000M:
121  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro 1000M:
100  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 1000M:
53.2  fps
NVIDIA Quadro 1000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dirt 3140.55434.5512.68
Fifa 1145019213273
Mafia 264.250.341.525.1
Trackmania Nations Forever12110053.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
3

2

1

2
1
1
2
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 17:05:34

#0 checking url part for id 11605 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2437 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720105534 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11605 +0.018s ... 0.047s

#8 got single benchmarks 11605 +0s ... 0.047s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 2437 +0s ... 0.047s

#10 got single benchmarks 2437 +0.004s ... 0.052s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.06s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.06s

#14 Got 15 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.062s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.062s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.062s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.064s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.064s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.065s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)