Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N97 vs Intel Core i7-6700K vs Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Processor N97

► remove from comparison Intel N97

The Intel Processor N97 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance should be between the Intel Processor N100 and Intel Processor N200 and clearly below the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. 

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at 1200 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N97 has a base power consumption of 12 W and therefore double the amount of the N100. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Core i7-6700K

► remove from comparison Intel 6700K

The Intel Core i7-6700K is a high-end quad-core desktop processor based on the Skylake architecture, which was announced in August 2015. The CPU, which is manufactured in a 14 nm process, runs at 4.0 up to 4.2 GHz (2 cores: 4.0 GHz, 3 cores: 4.0 GHz, 4 cores: 4.0 GHz) and can execute up to 8 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyperthreading. Being a so called "K"-model, the Core i7-6700K has a free multiplier and can be easily overclocked. 

Performance

Even though the Core i7-6700K has a slightly lower clock than the old i7-4790K (4.0 GHz - 4.4 GHz), the performance is slightly better compared to the Haswell predecessor. Depending on the application, the per-MHz performance was increased by roughly 5-10 %. Even the most demanding applications and games are no problem for the high-end CPU.

Graphics

Graphics are handled by the integrated Intel HD Graphics 530 with 24 EUs (Execution Units), which is clocked at 350 - 1150 MHz. Compared to the HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell, 20 EUs), the performance is increased by around 25 percent. The overall GPU performance is still low-end, so modern games can, if at all, only be played smoothly with low settings. 

Power Consumption

The TDP was slightly raised from 88 to 91 Watts compared to the predecessor.

Intel Core i7-6700

► remove from comparison Intel 6700

The Intel Core i7-6700 is a high-end quad-core desktop processor based on the Skylake architecture, which was announced in August 2015. The CPU, which is manufactured in a 14 nm process, runs at 3.4 up to 4.0 GHz (2 cores: 3.9 GHz, 4 cores: 3.7 GHz) and can execute up to 8 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyperthreading. Contrary to the Core i7-6700K, the i7-6700 does not have a free multiplier and can hardly be overclocked. 

Architecture

Intel uses Skylake to replace both Broadwell and Haswell and therefore once again uses one core design for all TDP classes. Several improvements of the Skylake architecture include bigger Out-to-Order-Buffer, optimizations for pre-fetching as well as bigger gains by Hyperthreading. However, the changes are small for a "Tock" – a new micro architecture – in general, so the per-MHz performance is only between 5-10 % (compared to Haswell) or less than 5 % higher (compared to Broadwell), respectively.

Performance

Even though the Core i7-6700 has a slightly lower clock than the old i7-4790 (3.6 GHz - 4.0 GHz), the performance is slightly better compared to the Haswell predecessor. Another 7 % faster is the top model i7-6700K. Even the most demanding applications and games are no problem for the high-end CPU.

Graphics

Graphics are handled by the integrated Intel HD Graphics 530 with 24 EUs (Execution Units), which is clocked at 350 - 1150 MHz. Compared to the HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell, 20 EUs), the performance is increased by around 25 percent. The overall GPU performance is still low-end, so modern games can, if at all, only be played smoothly with low settings. 

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 Watts.

ModelIntel Processor N97Intel Core i7-6700KIntel Core i7-6700
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Core i7 (Desktop)
CodenameAlder Lake-NSkylakeSkylake
Series: Core i7 (Desktop) Skylake
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 « - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700K « 4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-67003.4 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700T2.8 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700K4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700 « 3.4 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700T2.8 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock <=3600 MHz4000 - 4200 MHz3400 - 4000 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 84 / 8
TDP12 Watt91 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 530 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 530 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1151
FeaturesDDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
$339 U.S.$303 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N97
27.1 pt (38%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N97 +
63 Points (44%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N97 +
192 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N97 +
2913 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N97 +
973 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N97 +
371 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N97 +
1115 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N97 +
479 Points (3%)
min: 865     avg: 881     median: 880 (6%)     max: 910 Points
167%
6700 +
min: 743     avg: 791     median: 802 (5%)     max: 817 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N97 +
161 Points (48%)
min: 160     avg: 174.4     median: 177.5 (53%)     max: 182 Points
105%
6700 +
min: 117     avg: 156.3     median: 168.5 (51%)     max: 171 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N97 +
6 Points (8%)
min: 8.55     avg: 9.6     median: 9.7 (13%)     max: 10.2 Points
148%
6700 +
min: 8.69     avg: 8.8     median: 8.9 (12%)     max: 8.94 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N97 +
1.9 Points (48%)
min: 1.72     avg: 2     median: 2 (49%)     max: 2.16 Points
min: 1.89     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (48%)     max: 1.94 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N97 +
5445 Points (33%)
min: 6434     avg: 6980     median: 6531 (39%)     max: 8845 Points
110%
6700 +
min: 5634     avg: 6003     median: 6002.5 (36%)     max: 6371 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N97 +
15323 Points (11%)
min: 19705     avg: 24305     median: 25817 (19%)     max: 26150 Points
159%
6700 +
min: 24237     avg: 24305     median: 24304.5 (18%)     max: 24372 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
N97 +
24158 Points (17%)
min: 33740     avg: 34944     median: 34593 (24%)     max: 36500 Points
130%
6700 +
31339 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
N97 +
8567 Points (10%)
min: 8600     avg: 8758     median: 8624 (11%)     max: 9050 Points
8213 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N97 +
523 s (6%)
min: 178     avg: 225.4     median: 205.9 (2%)     max: 275 s
104%
6700 +
209 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N97 +
16.8 s (3%)
min: 5.726     avg: 7.2     median: 6.7 (1%)     max: 8.94 s
102%
6700 +
6.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N97 +
2321 Points (4%)
5877 Points (9%)
233%
6700 +
min: 5323     avg: 5413     median: 5412.5 (9%)     max: 5502 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N97 +
13174 MIPS (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N97 +
4019 MIPS (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N97 +
34.9 fps (12%)
min: 52.5     avg: 54.4     median: 54.6 (19%)     max: 55.3 fps
146%
6700 +
50.8 fps (18%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N97 +
174.8 fps (40%)
min: 194.2     avg: 204.7     median: 204.8 (47%)     max: 210.2 fps
107%
6700 +
187.4 fps (43%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N97 +
3.5 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N97 +
0.3 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.203     avg: 0.4     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.507 GB/s
180%
6700 +
min: 0.46     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.465 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N97 +
0.5 GB/s (9%)
min: 0.324     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (13%)     max: 0.848 GB/s
146%
6700 +
min: 0.77     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.781 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N97 +
2.9 GB/s (8%)
min: 1.7     avg: 3.8     median: 4.4 (11%)     max: 4.9 GB/s
153%
6700 +
min: 4.4     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (12%)     max: 4.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N97 +
2014 Seconds (26%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N97 +
1020 Seconds (7%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N97 +
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N97 +
6461 Points (14%)
min: 8973     avg: 9037     median: 9037 (19%)     max: 9101 Points
131%
6700 +
min: 8199     avg: 8403     median: 8478 (18%)     max: 8532 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N97 +
18.4 s (4%)
min: 8.787     avg: 9     median: 9 (2%)     max: 9.392 s
102%
6700 +
min: 9.3     avg: 9.7     median: 9.7 (2%)     max: 10 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N97 +
38.3 s (2%)
min: 19.7     avg: 20.3     median: 20.3 (1%)     max: 20.83 s
101%
6700 +
min: 20.8     avg: 22.4     median: 22.4 (1%)     max: 24 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N97 +
786 s (3%)
min: 463.8     avg: 479     median: 479.7 (2%)     max: 498.3 s
101%
6700 +
min: 490.8     avg: 537     median: 536.9 (2%)     max: 583 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 6700 +
155890 MIPS (74%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 6700 +
83810 MFLOPS (64%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
N97 +
15578 Points (14%)
min: 31997     avg: 32843     median: 32153 (28%)     max: 34379 Points
186%
6700 +
min: 28021     avg: 28924     median: 28924 (25%)     max: 29827 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N97 +
6118 Points (17%)
min: 10341     avg: 11161     median: 11228 (30%)     max: 11761 Points
161%
6700 +
min: 8405     avg: 9780     median: 9832 (27%)     max: 10416 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
N97 +
50003 Points (41%)
min: 59904     avg: 61163     median: 61287.5 (50%)     max: 62149 Points
110%
6700 +
min: 52447     avg: 54281     median: 54997 (45%)     max: 55398 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N97 +
50545 Points (41%)
121%
1 6700K +
min: 59247     avg: 60685     median: 61091 (50%)     max: 62096 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N97 +
52858 Points (45%)
118%
1 6700K +
min: 60945     avg: 61859     median: 62114 (52%)     max: 62262 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N97 +
4565 Points (12%)
min: 8328     avg: 9165     median: 9272 (23%)     max: 9702 Points
174%
6700 +
min: 7879     avg: 8131     median: 7952 (20%)     max: 8561 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N97 +
6473 Points (12%)
min: 12430     avg: 12822     median: 12870.5 (23%)     max: 13182 Points
176%
6700 +
min: 10918     avg: 11399     median: 11385 (20%)     max: 11819 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 N97 +
2493 Points (11%)
182%
1 6700 +
4535 Points (19%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 N97 +
1300 Points (35%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 N97 +
3181 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N97 +
1060 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N97 +
2757 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N97 +
1052 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N97 +
2738 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N97 +
4703 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N97 +
10893 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6700K +
16365 Points (29%)
92%
1 6700 +
min: 15038     avg: 15053     median: 15053 (27%)     max: 15068 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6700K +
4225 Points (83%)
95%
1 6700 +
min: 4022     avg: 4031     median: 4030.5 (79%)     max: 4039 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6700K +
min: 17030     avg: 17122     median: 17122 (27%)     max: 17214 Points
92%
1 6700 +
15812 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6700K +
min: 4436     avg: 4598     median: 4598 (69%)     max: 4760 Points
92%
1 6700 +
4233 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N97 +
975 ms (1%)
min: 795     avg: 800     median: 800 (1%)     max: 805 ms
100%
6700 +
812 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 6700K +
min: 76.8     avg: 119.5     median: 119.5 (1%)     max: 162.1 ms
101%
1 6700 +
67.9 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 6700K +
min: 37135     avg: 40412     median: 40411.5 (35%)     max: 43688 Points
110%
1 6700 +
44474 Points (39%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N97 +
145.3 Points (42%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N97 +
191.4 Points (40%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N97 +
844 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N97 +
37.1 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N97 +
28.4 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N97 +
13.5 Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N97 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-6700K → 144% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-6700 → 136% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 30. 19:37:21

#0 checking url part for id 14969 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6949 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7101 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719769041 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14969 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 14969 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6949 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 6949 +0.014s ... 0.03s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 7101 +0.001s ... 0.031s

#12 got single benchmarks 7101 +0.006s ... 0.037s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.066s ... 0.104s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.104s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)