Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Pentium Silver N6005

Intel Celeron N3060

► remove from comparison Intel N3060

The Intel Celeron N3060 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.48 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor architecture Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). The N3060 is successor (refresh) to the Celeron N3050 and compared to it it offers a improved Turbo clock rate (2.48 vs 2.1 GHZ).

In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Depending on the cooling of the SoC, the Boost clock rate of 2.48 can be held for longer periods and therefore leading to a faster performance as the older Celeron N3050 that can only reach 2.16 GHz. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light Internet browsing or office applications, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration. Although featuring a different name, the GPU was not changed from the N3050 (named HD Graphics alone).

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Pentium Silver N6005

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N6005

The Intel Pentium Silver N6005 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive and small desktop and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 3.3 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N6005 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 32 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 900 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0 / 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N6005 in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1110G4, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is enough to enjoy Web browsing and watch videos online without noticeable slowdowns, as of mid 2023 - which is what most consumers want.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 15 W, the Intel NUC11ATKPE is among the fastest systems built around the N6005 that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 10 Watts (versus the 6 W of the mobile N6000). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

ModelIntel Celeron N3060Intel Pentium Silver N6005
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Jasper Lake
CodenameBraswellJasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Celeron N3160 compare1.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3150 compare1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3060 « 1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3050 compare1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3000 compare1.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 « 2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1600 - 2480 MHz2000 - 3300 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB1.5 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP6 Watt10 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170BGA1338
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 700 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) (320 - 700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (450 - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N6005
22.7 pt (31%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1525     avg: 1944     median: 1833 (2%)     max: 2475 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 624     avg: 671     median: 694 (30%)     max: 696 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 239     avg: 255.7     median: 262 (29%)     max: 266 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 584     avg: 751     median: 720 (2%)     max: 948 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 68     avg: 71.8     median: 72.5 (0%)     max: 74 Points
min: 267     avg: 338     median: 319 (2%)     max: 428 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 36     avg: 37.8     median: 38 (11%)     max: 39 Points
min: 107     avg: 117     median: 121 (36%)     max: 123 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.86 Points
min: 4.14     avg: 4.9     median: 4.9 (6%)     max: 5.56 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.41     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (11%)     max: 0.46 Points
min: 1.47     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (37%)     max: 1.48 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1216     avg: 1253     median: 1267 (8%)     max: 1275 Points
min: 3776     avg: 3970     median: 3970 (24%)     max: 4164 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2256     avg: 2352     median: 2397 (2%)     max: 2402 Points
min: 10619     avg: 12496     median: 12496 (9%)     max: 14373 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
3426 Points (2%)
min: 15504     avg: 17871     median: 17871 (12%)     max: 20238 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1800 Points (2%)
min: 6163     avg: 6168     median: 6167.5 (8%)     max: 6172 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1361 s (16%)
min: 493.256     avg: 554     median: 554.1 (7%)     max: 615 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
43.1 s (9%)
min: 16.004     avg: 16.6     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 17.09 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1525     avg: 1675     median: 1674.5 (3%)     max: 1824 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 9367     avg: 10727     median: 9964 (6%)     max: 12851 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3425     avg: 3468     median: 3465 (41%)     max: 3515 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
5.5 fps (2%)
min: 21.6     avg: 25.2     median: 25.2 (9%)     max: 28.75 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
28.4 fps (7%)
min: 102     avg: 118.8     median: 118.8 (27%)     max: 135.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.65     avg: 1.9     median: 1.8 (3%)     max: 2.34 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.219     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.23 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.5 GB/s (1%)
min: 2.6     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (7%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2464 Seconds (31%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1354     avg: 1730     median: 1805 (13%)     max: 2032 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.073     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (25%)     max: 1.171 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 4881     avg: 5451     median: 5451 (12%)     max: 6021 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27.5 s (6%)
min: 17.564     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (4%)     max: 17.58 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
61.2 s (3%)
min: 39.14     avg: 39.2     median: 39.2 (2%)     max: 39.333 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1566 s (7%)
min: 866     avg: 881     median: 880.6 (4%)     max: 895.292 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 10338     avg: 12077     median: 12076.5 (11%)     max: 13815 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 918     avg: 995     median: 993 (3%)     max: 1076 Points
min: 3659     avg: 4342     median: 4341.5 (12%)     max: 5024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
10140 Points (8%)
min: 25277     avg: 36490     median: 36489.5 (30%)     max: 47702 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
8087 Points (7%)
min: 27534     avg: 37546     median: 37545.5 (30%)     max: 47557 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 10498     avg: 11007     median: 11006.5 (9%)     max: 11515 Points
min: 37549     avg: 46388     median: 46388 (39%)     max: 55227 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 668     avg: 735     median: 735 (2%)     max: 802 Points
min: 2945     avg: 3737     median: 3737 (9%)     max: 4529 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1124 Points (2%)
min: 4295     avg: 5349     median: 5349 (10%)     max: 6403 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1956 Points (8%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
578 Points (16%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
1332 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 606     avg: 680     median: 695 (29%)     max: 738 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1578     avg: 1884     median: 1673 (3%)     max: 2402 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 603     avg: 659     median: 680 (3%)     max: 694 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1313     avg: 1768     median: 1537 (5%)     max: 2455 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1127 Points (11%)
min: 2555     avg: 2878     median: 2764 (28%)     max: 3314 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1911 Points (2%)
min: 5097     avg: 6641     median: 5399 (6%)     max: 9426 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1087 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1834 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1708 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
913 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4901     avg: 4929     median: 4928.5 (6%)     max: 4956 ms
min: 1396     avg: 1443     median: 1417 (2%)     max: 1516 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 366.5     avg: 785     median: 976 (11%)     max: 1013 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 7341     avg: 7793     median: 7735 (7%)     max: 8303 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
104.2 Points (30%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 142.3     avg: 145.1     median: 146 (30%)     max: 147 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
539 Points (21%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18.9     avg: 23     median: 23 (4%)     max: 27 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18     avg: 21.8     median: 21.8 (4%)     max: 25.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.34     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (5%)     max: 8.21 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17.7 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3060 → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N6005 → 349% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 17:45:08

#0 checking url part for id 8067 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13109 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720107907 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8067 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 8067 +0.02s ... 0.029s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13109 +0.004s ... 0.033s

#9 got single benchmarks 13109 +0.006s ... 0.039s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.086s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.088s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)