Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Celeron N5105

Intel Celeron N3060

► remove from comparison Intel N3060

The Intel Celeron N3060 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.48 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor architecture Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). The N3060 is successor (refresh) to the Celeron N3050 and compared to it it offers a improved Turbo clock rate (2.48 vs 2.1 GHZ).

In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Depending on the cooling of the SoC, the Boost clock rate of 2.48 can be held for longer periods and therefore leading to a faster performance as the older Celeron N3050 that can only reach 2.16 GHz. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light Internet browsing or office applications, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration. Although featuring a different name, the GPU was not changed from the N3050 (named HD Graphics alone).

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N5105

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5105

The Intel Celeron N5105 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive desktops and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 2.9 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5105 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N5105 in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1005G1 and the Ryzen 3 3250U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 10 Watts (mobile and lower clocked N5100 6W). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

ModelIntel Celeron N3060Intel Celeron N5105
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Jasper Lake
CodenameBraswellJasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Celeron N3160 compare1.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3150 compare1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3060 « 1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3050 compare1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3000 compare1.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1600 - 2480 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB1.5 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP6 Watt10 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170BGA1338
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 700 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) (320 - 700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (450 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5105
21.7 pt (30%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
2175 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
618 Points (26%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
235 Points (26%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
826 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 68     avg: 71.8     median: 72.5 (0%)     max: 74 Points
368 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 36     avg: 37.8     median: 38 (11%)     max: 39 Points
108.1 Points (33%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.86 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 0.41     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (11%)     max: 0.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 1216     avg: 1253     median: 1267 (8%)     max: 1275 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 2256     avg: 2352     median: 2397 (2%)     max: 2402 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N3060 +
3426 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N3060 +
1800 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N3060 +
1361 s (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N3060 +
43.1 s (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
11153 MIPS (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3108 MIPS (37%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N3060 +
5.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N3060 +
28.4 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N3060 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N3060 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N3060 +
0.5 GB/s (1%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2940 Seconds (37%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1573 Seconds (11%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.2 sec (25%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N3060 +
27.5 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N3060 +
61.2 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N3060 +
1566 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 918     avg: 995     median: 993 (3%)     max: 1076 Points
4394 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
10140 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
8087 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 10498     avg: 11007     median: 11006.5 (9%)     max: 11515 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 668     avg: 735     median: 735 (2%)     max: 802 Points
3869 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1124 Points (2%)
5498 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1643 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
653 Points (28%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2080 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
649 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2069 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1127 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1911 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1087 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1834 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1708 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
913 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4901     avg: 4929     median: 4928.5 (6%)     max: 4956 ms
1582 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 366.5     avg: 785     median: 976 (11%)     max: 1013 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 7341     avg: 7793     median: 7735 (7%)     max: 8303 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
96.2 Points (28%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
134.2 Points (28%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
531 Points (20%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
24 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
22.7 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
16.2 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3060 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5105 → 392% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 18:31:22

#0 checking url part for id 8067 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13111 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720110682 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8067 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 8067 +0.017s ... 0.024s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13111 +0.004s ... 0.028s

#9 got single benchmarks 13111 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.058s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.06s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)