Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Celeron N4505

Intel Celeron N3060

► remove from comparison Intel N3060

The Intel Celeron N3060 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.48 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor architecture Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). The N3060 is successor (refresh) to the Celeron N3050 and compared to it it offers a improved Turbo clock rate (2.48 vs 2.1 GHZ).

In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Depending on the cooling of the SoC, the Boost clock rate of 2.48 can be held for longer periods and therefore leading to a faster performance as the older Celeron N3050 that can only reach 2.16 GHz. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light Internet browsing or office applications, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration. Although featuring a different name, the GPU was not changed from the N3050 (named HD Graphics alone).

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N4505

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4505

The Intel Celeron N4505 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive and small desktops and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 2.9 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N4505 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is built with Intel's first-gen 10 nm process, just like Ice Lake family processors.

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 750 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4505 in our database is just as fast as AMD's dual-core Athlon Silver 3050e and Intel's previous-gen Celeron N4100, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. In other words, the Celeron is good for basic day-to-day activities but not much more than that, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This Celeron series SoC has a default TDP, also known as the long-term Power Limit, of 10 W, which is low enough to allow for passively cooled designs.

The N4505 is manufactured on the first-gen or the second-gen (no exact data available) 10 nm Intel process making for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron N3060Intel Celeron N4505
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Jasper Lake
CodenameBraswellJasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Celeron N3160 compare1.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3150 compare1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3060 « 1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3050 compare1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3000 compare1.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1600 - 2480 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB1.5 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP6 Watt10 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170BGA1338
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 700 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) (320 - 700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4505
19.9 pt (28%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1114     avg: 1149     median: 1148.5 (1%)     max: 1183 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 592     avg: 604     median: 603.5 (26%)     max: 615 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 224     avg: 230     median: 230 (26%)     max: 236 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 431     avg: 441.5     median: 441.5 (1%)     max: 452 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 68     avg: 71.8     median: 72.5 (0%)     max: 74 Points
min: 191     avg: 197.5     median: 197.5 (1%)     max: 204 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 36     avg: 37.8     median: 38 (11%)     max: 39 Points
min: 104     avg: 106     median: 106 (32%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.86 Points
min: 2.46     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.52 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.41     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (11%)     max: 0.46 Points
min: 1.27     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (32%)     max: 1.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1216     avg: 1253     median: 1267 (8%)     max: 1275 Points
min: 3606     avg: 3622     median: 3621.5 (22%)     max: 3637 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2256     avg: 2352     median: 2397 (2%)     max: 2402 Points
min: 6831     avg: 6861     median: 6860.5 (5%)     max: 6890 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
3426 Points (2%)
10063 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1800 Points (2%)
5294 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1361 s (16%)
min: 1120.44     avg: 1132     median: 1131.7 (13%)     max: 1143 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
43.1 s (9%)
min: 35.481     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 36.2 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
36.1 s (19%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1000     avg: 1062     median: 1061.5 (2%)     max: 1123 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 5871     avg: 6004     median: 6003.5 (3%)     max: 6136 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2971     avg: 3047     median: 3046.5 (36%)     max: 3122 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
5.5 fps (2%)
min: 13.5     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (5%)     max: 13.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
28.4 fps (7%)
72.3 fps (17%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.22 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.099     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.101 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
min: 0.184     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.192 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.5 GB/s (1%)
1.3 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 5719     avg: 5742     median: 5741.5 (73%)     max: 5764 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2845     avg: 2899     median: 2899 (20%)     max: 2953 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.162     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.224 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3165     avg: 3214     median: 3214 (7%)     max: 3263 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27.5 s (6%)
min: 19.931     avg: 20.9     median: 20.9 (5%)     max: 21.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
61.2 s (3%)
min: 44.275     avg: 45.7     median: 45.7 (2%)     max: 47.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1566 s (7%)
min: 997     avg: 1003     median: 1003.5 (4%)     max: 1009.94 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
6156 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 918     avg: 995     median: 993 (3%)     max: 1076 Points
min: 2700     avg: 2720     median: 2719.5 (7%)     max: 2739 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
10140 Points (8%)
24182 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
8087 Points (7%)
min: 24027     avg: 24121     median: 24121 (20%)     max: 24215 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 10498     avg: 11007     median: 11006.5 (9%)     max: 11515 Points
min: 25571     avg: 25808     median: 25808 (22%)     max: 26045 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 668     avg: 735     median: 735 (2%)     max: 802 Points
min: 2130     avg: 2131     median: 2130.5 (5%)     max: 2131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1124 Points (2%)
min: 2979     avg: 2993     median: 2992.5 (5%)     max: 3006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
894 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 647     avg: 654     median: 653.5 (28%)     max: 660 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1225     avg: 1232     median: 1232 (2%)     max: 1239 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 645     avg: 648     median: 648 (3%)     max: 651 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1205     avg: 1215     median: 1214.5 (4%)     max: 1224 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1127 Points (11%)
min: 2942     avg: 2946     median: 2945.5 (29%)     max: 2949 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1911 Points (2%)
min: 5078     avg: 5082     median: 5082 (6%)     max: 5086 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1087 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1834 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1708 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
913 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4901     avg: 4929     median: 4928.5 (6%)     max: 4956 ms
min: 1578     avg: 1688     median: 1688 (2%)     max: 1798 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 366.5     avg: 785     median: 976 (11%)     max: 1013 ms
353.4 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 7341     avg: 7793     median: 7735 (7%)     max: 8303 Points
24502 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 79.3     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (23%)     max: 81.2 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 113.3     avg: 114.2     median: 114.2 (24%)     max: 115 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 442     avg: 444     median: 444 (17%)     max: 446 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18.3     avg: 19     median: 19 (3%)     max: 19.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 15.4     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 17.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3060 → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4505 → 228% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 30. 17:35:21

#0 checking url part for id 8067 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13113 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719761721 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8067 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 8067 +0.014s ... 0.022s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13113 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#9 got single benchmarks 13113 +0.005s ... 0.031s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.042s ... 0.073s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.076s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)