Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom N2800 vs AMD E1-1500

Intel Atom N2800

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom N2800 is a dual core entry level processor for netbooks and tablets. It was officially announced in December 2011 and is produced in 32nm.

It features a PowerVR SGX545 based graphics card (at 640MHz) named Graphics Media Accelerator 3650 and a video decoding engine for MPEG4 Part2, VC-1, WMV9, and H.264. Furthermore, the chip now also supports DisplayPort 1.1 and HDMI 1.3a outputs.

The processor core is still similar to older Atom processors. Therefore the performance of the N2800 is comparable to an older Atom D525.

The integrated 64Bit Single-Channel DDR3-800/1067 memory controller supports two SODIMMS and a maximum of 4 GB RAM.

AMD E1-1500

► remove from comparison

The AMD E1-1500 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the old E1-1200, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1500 offers an 80 MHz higher CPU and 29 MHz higher GPU clock rate.

Inside the E1-1500 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E1-1500 is a bit below an Athlon X2 L310 at 1.2 GHz

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. In the E1-1500 the 7310 is clocked at 529 MHz and therefore not much different to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 W by AMD. That's similar to Intels (faster) Ivy and Sandy Bridge ULV-CPUs.

ModelIntel Atom N2800AMD E1-1500
SeriesIntel AtomAMD E-Series
CodenameCedarview-MZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
Intel Atom N2850 compare2 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2800 « 1.86 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2650 compare1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1500 « 1.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1860 MHz1480 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP6,5 Watt18 Watt
Technology32 nm40 nm
iGPUIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$47 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
Die Size75 mm2
SocketFT1 BGA 413-Ball
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N2800 +
648 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N2800 +
1829 Points (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2800 +
1719 s (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2800 +
54.3 s (11%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2800 +
625 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2800 +
3.7 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2800 +
19.7 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2800 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2800 +
0.1 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2800 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2800 +
965 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N2800 +
79.1 s (17%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N2800 +
174.8 s (7%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N2800 +
3884 s (17%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N2800 +
2250 Points (5%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 N2800 +
3.3 Points (42%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N2800 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 29. 15:54:28

#0 checking url part for id 2686 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3634 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719669268 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2686 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 2686 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3634 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 3634 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.025s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.027s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)