Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom N2800 vs AMD E1-1200

Intel Atom N2800

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom N2800 is a dual core entry level processor for netbooks and tablets. It was officially announced in December 2011 and is produced in 32nm.

It features a PowerVR SGX545 based graphics card (at 640MHz) named Graphics Media Accelerator 3650 and a video decoding engine for MPEG4 Part2, VC-1, WMV9, and H.264. Furthermore, the chip now also supports DisplayPort 1.1 and HDMI 1.3a outputs.

The processor core is still similar to older Atom processors. Therefore the performance of the N2800 is comparable to an older Atom D525.

The integrated 64Bit Single-Channel DDR3-800/1067 memory controller supports two SODIMMS and a maximum of 4 GB RAM.

AMD E1-1200

► remove from comparison

The AMD E1-1200 (codename Zacate, not to be confused with the Ryzen 3 1200 from 2017) is a dual-core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It is produced on a 40 nm process and offers a relatively powerful integrated GPU and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller. Compared to the older E-300, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1200 offers a 100 MHz higher CPU clock rate.

The E1-1200 has two Bobcat cores running at 1.4 GHz (no Boost here) that can access 512 KB of L2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 GPU offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video decoder. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, an HD 7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The HD 7310's clock rate is 500 MHz to be very similar to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

Performance

The average E1-1200 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N2807 and the AMD E-300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is an outrageously slow chip, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This E-series APU has a default TDP of 18 W, meaning an active cooling solution is pretty much a must.

The AMD E1-1200 is built with a 40 nm process for very, very, very low, as of 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Atom N2800AMD E1-1200
SeriesIntel AtomAMD E-Series
CodenameCedarview-MZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
Intel Atom N2850 compare2 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2800 « 1.86 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2650 compare1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1860 MHz1400 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP6,5 Watt18 Watt
Technology32 nm40 nm
iGPUIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 7310
Architecturex86x86
$47 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache128 KB
Die Size75 mm2
SocketFT1 (BGA413)
FeaturesDDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 0.27     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
648 Points (4%)
min: 888     avg: 906     median: 912 (6%)     max: 918 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
1829 Points (1%)
min: 1654     avg: 1709     median: 1682 (1%)     max: 1791 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 1887     avg: 1909     median: 1913 (1%)     max: 1926 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 984     avg: 1000     median: 1008 (1%)     max: 1008 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1719 s (20%)
min: 2347     avg: 2479     median: 2410 (28%)     max: 2679 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
54.3 s (11%)
min: 74     avg: 78.7     median: 76 (15%)     max: 86.2 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
625 Points (1%)
min: 398     avg: 417.5     median: 417.5 (1%)     max: 437 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2800 +
3.7 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2800 +
19.7 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2800 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2800 +
0.1 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2800 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
965 Points (2%)
min: 837     avg: 872     median: 873.5 (2%)     max: 905 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
79.1 s (17%)
min: 48.44     avg: 54.1     median: 57 (12%)     max: 57 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
174.8 s (7%)
min: 110.5     avg: 120.8     median: 124 (5%)     max: 128 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
3884 s (17%)
min: 2718     avg: 2755     median: 2766 (12%)     max: 2780 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8000 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
6460 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N2800 +
2250 Points (5%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
3.3 Points (42%)
min: 3.4     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (46%)     max: 3.6 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 1347     avg: 1594     median: 1645.5 (1%)     max: 1738 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 598     avg: 602     median: 604 (2%)     max: 605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8205 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
596 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
748 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1437 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1179 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1597 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1433 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1440 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N2800 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks AMD E1-1200 → 100% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 03. 18:56:24

#0 checking url part for id 2686 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3146 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720025784 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2686 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 2686 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3146 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 3146 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.035s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.038s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)