Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom N2800 vs AMD E-240 vs Intel Atom N2850

Intel Atom N2800

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom N2800 is a dual core entry level processor for netbooks and tablets. It was officially announced in December 2011 and is produced in 32nm.

It features a PowerVR SGX545 based graphics card (at 640MHz) named Graphics Media Accelerator 3650 and a video decoding engine for MPEG4 Part2, VC-1, WMV9, and H.264. Furthermore, the chip now also supports DisplayPort 1.1 and HDMI 1.3a outputs.

The processor core is still similar to older Atom processors. Therefore the performance of the N2800 is comparable to an older Atom D525.

The integrated 64Bit Single-Channel DDR3-800/1067 memory controller supports two SODIMMS and a maximum of 4 GB RAM.

AMD E-240

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-240 (codename Zacate) is a single core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-240 one Bobcat core (the second one is deactivated) can access 512KB level 2 cache. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (AMD V-Series) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-240 should be between a 2 GHz Atom and a Celeron single core with 1.1 GHz.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD.

Intel Atom N2850

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom N2850 is a dual core entry level processor for netbooks and tablets. It was officially announced in January 2012 and is produced in 32nm.

It features a PowerVR SGX545 based graphics card (at 640MHz) named Graphics Media Accelerator 3650 and a video decoding engine for MPEG4 Part2, VC-1, WMV9, and H.264. Furthermore, the chip now also supports DisplayPort 1.1 and HDMI 1.3a outputs.

The processor core should be still similar to the old Atom processors. Therefore the performance of the N2850 should be faster than an older Atom D525.

The integrated 64 Bit Single-Channel DDR3-800/1067 memory controller supports two SODIMMS and a maximum of 4 GB RAM.

ModelIntel Atom N2800AMD E-240Intel Atom N2850
SeriesIntel AtomAMD E-SeriesIntel Atom
CodenameCedarview-MZacateCedarview-M
Series: Atom Cedarview-M
Intel Atom N28502 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2800 « 1.86 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N26501.73 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N26001.6 GHz2 / 4 cores
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 « 1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Atom N2850 « 2 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N28001.86 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N26501.73 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N26001.6 GHz2 / 4 cores
Clock1860 MHz1500 MHz2000 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 41 / 12 / 4
TDP6,5 Watt18 Watt6,6 Watt
Technology32 nm40 nm32 nm
iGPUIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$47 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
L1 Cache64 KB
Die Size75 mm2
SocketFT1 BGA 413-Ball
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E-240 +
0.3 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N2800 +
648 Points (4%)
145%
1 E-240 +
min: 891     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (6%)     max: 984 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N2800 +
1829 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 988     avg: 1016     median: 1015.5 (1%)     max: 1043 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2800 +
1719 s (20%)
59%
1 E-240 +
4472 s (53%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2800 +
54.3 s (11%)
81%
1 E-240 +
137.4 s (28%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2800 +
625 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2800 +
3.7 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2800 +
19.7 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2800 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2800 +
0.1 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2800 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2800 +
965 Points (2%)
52%
1 E-240 +
min: 497     avg: 501     median: 500.5 (1%)     max: 504 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N2800 +
79.1 s (17%)
106%
1 E-240 +
57.5 s (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N2800 +
174.8 s (7%)
103%
1 E-240 +
120.3 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N2800 +
3884 s (17%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 3750     avg: 4097     median: 4270 (2%)     max: 4270 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 3520     avg: 3730     median: 3520 (3%)     max: 4150 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N2800 +
2250 Points (5%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 N2800 +
3.3 Points (42%)
76%
1 E-240 +
2.5 Points (32%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E-240 +
269 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N2800 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD E-240 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 18:47:19

#0 checking url part for id 2686 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1511 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3043 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719852439 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2686 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 2686 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1511 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 1511 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 3043 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#12 got single benchmarks 3043 +0s ... 0.017s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.029s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.029s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)