Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N100 vs Intel Celeron N4500

Intel Processor N100

► remove from comparison Intel N100

The Intel Processor N100 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with 1 to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

The average N100 in our database delivers unimpressive multi-thread benchmark scores that are most similar to those of the Core i3-1115G4. The chip is fast enough for many day-to-day tasks, but not much more than that; the other thing to keep in mind is that of the two N100-toting systems tested by us as of October 2023, both have rather high CPU power limits. The chip will be noticeably slower if limited to just six or seven Watts.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N100 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Processor N100Intel Celeron N4500
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Jasper Lake
CodenameAlder Lake-NJasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 « 1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1000 - 3400 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 / 2
TDP6 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1264BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$128 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L2 Cache1.5 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N100
25.2 pt (35%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
17.2 pt (24%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 60     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (42%)     max: 61 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (4%)     max: 196 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
N100 +
min: 1577     avg: 2378     median: 2203 (2%)     max: 2983 Points
709 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
N100 +
min: 747     avg: 881     median: 907 (39%)     max: 942 Points
452 Points (19%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N100 +
min: 285     avg: 336.6     median: 346 (38%)     max: 358 Points
188 Points (21%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N100 +
min: 590     avg: 907     median: 842 (2%)     max: 1139 Points
332 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 246     avg: 371.3     median: 336 (2%)     max: 479 Points
171 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 118.8     avg: 143     median: 146 (44%)     max: 155 Points
82 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 3.84     avg: 4.6     median: 4.2 (6%)     max: 5.99 Points
2.1 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 1.55     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (44%)     max: 1.87 Points
1 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 4604     avg: 4896     median: 4869 (29%)     max: 5179 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 9608     avg: 12281     median: 11207 (8%)     max: 15336 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
N100 +
min: 14514     avg: 18829     median: 16948 (12%)     max: 24225 Points
6954 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
N100 +
min: 7171     avg: 7699     median: 7750 (9%)     max: 8227 Points
5266 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N100 +
min: 481.652     avg: 569     median: 588.3 (7%)     max: 645.884 s
1270 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N100 +
min: 15.795     avg: 16.5     median: 16.2 (3%)     max: 17.7 s
50.2 s (10%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N100 +
min: 2187     avg: 2343     median: 2372 (4%)     max: 2501 Points
1076 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
N100 +
min: 7532     avg: 10800     median: 10350 (6%)     max: 13291 MIPS
5394 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N100 +
min: 3046     avg: 3623     median: 3635 (43%)     max: 3958 MIPS
2853 MIPS (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N100 +
min: 20.85     avg: 27.1     median: 24.1 (8%)     max: 34.7 fps
12 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N100 +
min: 101.8     avg: 134.8     median: 121.2 (28%)     max: 173 fps
60.6 fps (14%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N100 +
min: 1.72     avg: 2.7     median: 2.5 (4%)     max: 3.49 fps
0.7 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N100 +
min: 0.257     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (0%)     max: 0.263 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N100 +
min: 0.529     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.538 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N100 +
min: 2.8     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (8%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
1.1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1992     avg: 2624     median: 2373 (30%)     max: 3964 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N100 +
min: 1017     avg: 1360     median: 1346 (9%)     max: 1956 Seconds
4249 Seconds (30%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
N100 +
min: 0.822     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 1.06 sec
2.1 sec (46%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N100 +
min: 4091     avg: 5232     median: 4838 (10%)     max: 6441 Points
2053 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N100 +
min: 19.264     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.531 s
22.8 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N100 +
min: 40.302     avg: 40.5     median: 40.4 (2%)     max: 40.679 s
51.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N100 +
min: 816.966     avg: 836     median: 818.8 (4%)     max: 863.891 s
1132 s (5%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N100 +
min: 9434     avg: 12661     median: 11998 (11%)     max: 15625 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 3723     avg: 5202     median: 5818 (16%)     max: 6486 Points
1507 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 34828     avg: 42619     median: 41217 (33%)     max: 51063 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 34083     avg: 42751     median: 41809 (34%)     max: 51420 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 50867     avg: 52297     median: 52338 (44%)     max: 53373 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 3133     avg: 3873     median: 3565 (9%)     max: 4693 Points
1521 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 4589     avg: 5712     median: 5889 (10%)     max: 6602 Points
2017 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
N100 +
min: 1407     avg: 1925     median: 1610 (7%)     max: 2516 Points
504 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 1070     avg: 1192     median: 1227 (33%)     max: 1245 Points
457 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 2283     avg: 2892     median: 3133 (12%)     max: 3282 Points
662 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 915     avg: 981     median: 991 (42%)     max: 1018 Points
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (25%)     max: 598 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 1911     avg: 2567     median: 2812.5 (5%)     max: 2896 Points
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 968     avg: 990     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1008 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2278     avg: 2624     median: 2753 (9%)     max: 2862 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 4278     avg: 4440     median: 4467 (45%)     max: 4549 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 10361     avg: 11002     median: 11197 (12%)     max: 11264 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N100 +
min: 1004     avg: 1053     median: 1024 (1%)     max: 1122 ms
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24838 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
N100 +
min: 128.3     avg: 133.3     median: 133.3 (38%)     max: 138.3 Points
91.2 Points (26%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N100 +
min: 156.3     avg: 170.3     median: 170.4 (36%)     max: 187.4 Points
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (20%)     max: 141.3 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6833 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
7404 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N100 +
min: 706     avg: 774     median: 785 (30%)     max: 839 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.2     avg: 20.3     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 29.1 Watt
10.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.4     avg: 20     median: 20.5 (4%)     max: 26.1 Watt
9.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2.84     avg: 7.5     median: 8.2 (5%)     max: 10.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 N100 +
3.9 Watt (4%)
5.5 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 N100 +
min: 17.6     avg: 18.3     median: 18.3 (14%)     max: 19.1 Points per Watt
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N100 → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 55% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 00:24:07

#0 checking url part for id 14932 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720045447 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14932 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 14932 +0.012s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#9 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.001s ... 0.023s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.064s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.067s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)