Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-T760 MP2 vs Qualcomm Adreno 530

ARM Mali-T760 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T760 MP2

The ARM Mali-T760 MP2 is a mobile graphics solution for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2015 and for example integrated in the MediaTek MT6752 SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. According to ARM, the Mali-T760 can be scaled from 1 - 16 cores/clusters.

The MP2 version offers 2 clusters clocked at up to 700 MHz (48 GFLOPS). Therefore, it only offers one third of the theoretical performance of the T760MP6 version. The gaming performance should be similar to the Adreno 405 or PowerVR G6200. Therefore, it is situated in the middle class in 2014 and all games of that year should run fluently.

Due to the only 2 cores, the GPU is also suited for small tablets and smartphones.

Qualcomm Adreno 530

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 530

The Qualcomm Adreno 530 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in the last quarter of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 SoC. It supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.1.

The GPU uses a still unknown amount of unified shaders clocked at up to 624 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. Compared to the predecessor Adreno 430, the 530 is especially faster in demanding benchmarks.

show full text
ARM Mali-T760 MP2Qualcomm Adreno 530
Adreno 500 Series
Mali-T760 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 compare 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 compare 1 @ 0.6 GHz
Adreno 540 compare @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512 compare
Adreno 510 compare
Adreno 509 compare
Adreno 508 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 compare @ 0.45 GHz
CodenameMidgard (3rd Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (3rd-gen)
Pipelines2 - unified
Core Speed700 MHz624 MHz
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.1DirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.1 AEP
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11.1, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAAOpenGL ES 3.1 AEP, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1 (FL 11_1)
Date of Announcement01.10.2013 15.12.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
technology14 nm
CPU in Mali-T760 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT87528 x 1700 MHz? MHz700 MHz
Mediatek MT67528 x 1700 MHz? MHz700 MHz
Mediatek MT87324 x 1500 MHz? MHz500 MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? MHz500 - 700 MHz
CPU in Adreno 530GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro4 x 2400 MHz? MHz653 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM89964 x 2200 MHz? MHz624 MHz
min. - max.? MHz500 - 700 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 7352     avg: 8363     median: 8041 (1%)     max: 10019 Points
min: 24310     avg: 32869     median: 32997 (4%)     max: 40761 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 4310     avg: 4909     median: 4794.5 (1%)     max: 6047 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 8765     avg: 9158     median: 9135 (1%)     max: 9573 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 2649     avg: 3348     median: 3425 (15%)     max: 3806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3401     avg: 4503     median: 4661.5 (10%)     max: 5006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2252     avg: 2605     median: 2594.5 (13%)     max: 2893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2488     avg: 2996     median: 3108 (9%)     max: 3253 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7.1     avg: 8.4     median: 7.2 (1%)     max: 11 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 17.7     median: 19 (1%)     max: 19 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 18.3     median: 19 (2%)     max: 20 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 12     avg: 28.6     median: 31 (1%)     max: 34.02 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 1     avg: 4.4     median: 5 (0%)     max: 6.1 fps
min: 26     avg: 43     median: 44.5 (3%)     max: 49 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP2
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 13.2     avg: 16.1     median: 16 (0%)     max: 19.2 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530
min: 47.19     avg: 83.3     median: 88 (1%)     max: 96 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 31.7     avg: 36.6     median: 36.6 (60%)     max: 41.48 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 4327     avg: 4514     median: 4513.5 (10%)     max: 4700 Points
min: 21420     avg: 30602     median: 33028 (75%)     max: 35449 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 10969     avg: 11318     median: 11318 (25%)     max: 11667 Points
min: 28538     avg: 37215     median: 38353 (85%)     max: 41500 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 53     avg: 53.7     median: 53.7 (80%)     max: 54.4 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3808     avg: 3882     median: 3881.5 (4%)     max: 3955 Points
min: 4781     avg: 5512     median: 5612.5 (6%)     max: 6042 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1250     avg: 1275     median: 1274.5 (2%)     max: 1299 Points
min: 1913     avg: 2183     median: 2178.5 (4%)     max: 2461 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 3843     avg: 4239     median: 4320 (94%)     max: 4489 Points
4410 Points (96%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T760 MP2 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 335% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 530:
0 (!) 30 30 30 30 56 58 59 59 60 60 ~ 43 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Adreno 530:
29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 530:
0 (!) 29 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 48 ~ 29 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
Adreno 530:
60  fps
high
Adreno 530:
35 51 ~ 43 fps
Qualcomm Adreno 530lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 243
Asphalt 8: Airborne3029
Real Racing 36043
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1



1
2










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 03. 22:38:16

#0 checking url part for id 5997 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7062 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720039095 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:16:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.055s ... 0.055s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.055s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5997 +0.019s ... 0.074s

#8 got single benchmarks 5997 +0.009s ... 0.083s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7062 +0s ... 0.083s

#10 got single benchmarks 7062 +0.018s ... 0.101s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.101s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.104s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.105s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.116s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.116s

#16 Got 41 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.124s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.124s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.124s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.125s

#20 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.125s

#21 return log +0.002s ... 0.127s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)