Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G610 MP4 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs ARM Mali-G610 MP3

ARM Mali-G610 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G610 MP4

The ARM Mali-G610 MP4 or MC4 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for smartphones with 4 cores. It is based on the second generation of the Valhall architecture and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and Vulkan 1.2. It was first integrated in the 2023 smartphone SoC, the MediaTek Dimensity 7200-Ultra.

Qualcomm Adreno 680

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm it is 2x faster than the previous Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 850 for Windows PCs with a 60% improved efficiency (thanks to the 7nm process). The performance should be similar to a Intel UHD Graphics 620 (e.g. in a 8th gen Core i5) when running native ARM64 compiled Windows apps and games. Running emulated 32 bit games (64 bit games compiled for AMD/Intel are not supported), the performance is notably slower.

ARM Mali-G610 MP3

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G610 MP3

The ARM Mali-G610 MP3 or MC3 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for smartphones with 3 cores. It is based on the second generation of the Valhall architecture and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and Vulkan 1.2.

We first found the GPU in the 2023 MediaTek Dimensity 7030 where the GPU positioned itself between the Adreno 642L (Snapdragon 778G) and Adreno 644 (Snapdragon 7 Gen 1) depending on the benchmark (see below).

The Mali-G610 MP3 in the Dimensity 7030 is manufactured in the matured 6nm process at TSMC.

ARM Mali-G610 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 680ARM Mali-G610 MP3
Mali-G610 Series
Mali-G610 MP6 6
Mali-G610 MP4 6
Mali-G610 MP3 3
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Mali-G610 MP6 6
Mali-G610 MP4 6
Mali-G610 MP3 3
CodenameValhallValhall
ArchitectureValhallValhall
Pipelines6 - unified3 - unified
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm7 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement25.05.2021 06.12.2018 25.05.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comwww.arm.com
Power Consumption7 Watt
CPU in Mali-G610 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 72008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 680GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G8 x 3150 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx8 x 2840 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G610 MP3GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 70308 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 7035     avg: 7158     median: 7158 (31%)     max: 7281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 9011     avg: 9380     median: 9379.5 (21%)     max: 9748 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5966     avg: 6016     median: 6015.5 (30%)     max: 6065 Points
4211 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6935     avg: 7105     median: 7105 (21%)     max: 7275 Points
4258 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 4259     avg: 4371     median: 4371 (2%)     max: 4483 Points
2583 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1156     avg: 1179     median: 1179 (1%)     max: 1202 Points
693 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1650     avg: 1847     median: 1847 (3%)     max: 2044 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1593     avg: 1936     median: 1935.5 (2%)     max: 2278 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 680
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
353 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.4     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (4%)     max: 9.5 fps
5.3 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 21     avg: 21.5     median: 21.5 (4%)     max: 22 fps
12 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 53     avg: 53.5     median: 53.5 (4%)     max: 54 fps
32 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 40     avg: 42     median: 42 (5%)     max: 44 fps
26 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 67     avg: 70     median: 70 (1%)     max: 73 fps
49 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 98     avg: 104.5     median: 104.5 (6%)     max: 111 fps
71 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G610 MP4
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 159     avg: 175     median: 175 (1%)     max: 191 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 680
140.2 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G610 MP3
117 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 187031     avg: 202428     median: 202428 (25%)     max: 217824 Points
136557 Points (17%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
71 fps (0%)
39.7 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 3292     avg: 3307     median: 3306.5 (1%)     max: 3321 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 3207     avg: 3290     median: 3289.5 (1%)     max: 3372 Points
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1890 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
30918 Points (31%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
35024 Points (61%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.26     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (2%)     max: 4.58 Watt
8.8 Watt (3%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G610 MP4 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 680 → 80% n=1

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G610 MP3 → 67% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G610 MP3:
60  fps
ultra Ultra
Mali-G610 MP3:
38  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Mali-G610 MP4:
47.9 53 ~ 50 fps
60%
Mali-G610 MP3:
30  fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G610 MP4:
34.6 44 ~ 39 fps
74%
Mali-G610 MP3:
29  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G610 MP4:
59.3  fps
101%
Mali-G610 MP3:
60  fps
med.
100%
Mali-G610 MP4:
39.7  fps
high
100%
Mali-G610 MP4:
39.4 60 ~ 50 fps
80%
Mali-G610 MP3:
40  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
100%
Mali-G610 MP4:
57.3 60 ~ 59 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G610 MP4 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G610 MP3 → 79%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 91%

ARM Mali-G610 MP3lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal6038
Genshin Impact3029
PUBG Mobile6040
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2




1

1
1







ARM Mali-G610 MP4lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact5039
PUBG Mobile59.339.750
Asphalt 9: Legends59
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2


1


2


1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 02. 05:04:59

#0 checking url part for id 12462 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9846 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11622 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719889499 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:16:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.028s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12462 +0.027s ... 0.055s

#9 got single benchmarks 12462 +0.005s ... 0.06s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9846 +0s ... 0.06s

#11 got single benchmarks 9846 +0.004s ... 0.064s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11622 +0s ... 0.065s

#13 got single benchmarks 11622 +0.003s ... 0.068s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.068s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.083s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.083s

#17 Got 16 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.086s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.086s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.086s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.088s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.088s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.088s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)