Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

Apple M2

► remove from comparison Apple M2

The Apple M2 is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2022 MacBook Air and, MacBook Pro 13. It offers 8 cores divided in four performance cores and four power-efficiency cores. The big cores offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 16 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB). The four efficiency cores are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with  up to 2,4 GHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with up to 3,5 GHz and therefore higher than the M1 cores. The architecture should be similar to the A15 (iPhone 13) with Avalanche and Blizzard cores.

The chip features a unified memory architecture for the CPU and GPU cores and supports up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 for a bandwidth of up to 100GB/s.

According to Apple, the M2 offers a 18% higher CPU performance at the same power consumption level compared to the Apple M1. In our tests, the MacBook Pro 13 with active cooling was able to reach the 18% in Geekbench Multi. In other benchmarks we measured 12 to 15% gains compared to the M1. Therefore, the performance is now near the M1 Pro with 8 cores. The passively cooled MacBook Air may however suffer from throttling in longer load scenarios.

The integrated graphics card in the M2 offers 8 or 10 cores and a peak performance of 3.6 TFLOPs.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine with a peak performance of 16 TOPS (for AI hardware acceleration), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), Thunderbolt / USB 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders.

The Apple M2 includes 20 billion transistors (up from the 16 billion of the M1) and is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is rated at 20W what we also measured under CPU load.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-78-100 is the least powerful member of the Snapdragon X Elite processor series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The top dog, known as the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if the X Elite is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Our first benchmarks (featuring a 35 W X Elite X1E-78-100) revealed very decent CPU performance figures that see the X Elite going head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. It's also not much faster or slower than the Apple M3 chip with 10 GPU cores. While not groundbreaking, this should be good enough for the user to be able to run any applications in 2024 and 2025.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that's good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming according to our in-house testing results. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno fails to outgun the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-78-100 is set to be slightly less power-hungry than its more powerful brothers. Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and on the performance profile chosen. That's exactly what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelApple M2Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
SeriesApple Apple M2Qualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Apple M2 Max compare2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro compare2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core compare2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 « 2.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 « - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 compare8 / 8 cores Oryon
Clock2424 - 3480 MHz <=3400 MHz
L1 Cache2 MB
L2 Cache20 MB
L3 Cache8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 812 / 12
8 x 3.4 GHz
4 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP20 Watt35 Watt
Transistors20000 Million
Technology5 nm4 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.apple.comwww.qualcomm.com
CodenameOryon
TDP Turbo PL245 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
34.5 pt (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
M2 +
121 Points (84%)
min: 102.8     avg: 105.4     median: 105.4 (73%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
M2 +
513 Points (10%)
min: 768     avg: 935     median: 956 (18%)     max: 1132 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
M2 +
min: 8517     avg: 8654     median: 8667 (8%)     max: 8772 Points
min: 10856     avg: 10908     median: 10908 (10%)     max: 10960 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
M2 +
min: 1580     avg: 1595     median: 1585 (67%)     max: 1638 Points
min: 1111     avg: 1121     median: 1120.5 (48%)     max: 1130 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
M2 +
min: 216     avg: 370.8     median: 381 (42%)     max: 446 Points
min: 416     avg: 418     median: 418 (46%)     max: 420 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
M2 +
min: 2231     avg: 2325     median: 2324 (6%)     max: 2416 Points
min: 4033     avg: 4081     median: 4080.5 (10%)     max: 4128 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
M2 +
min: 1209.9     avg: 1222     median: 1215 (8%)     max: 1243 Points
min: 1984     avg: 2080     median: 2079.5 (13%)     max: 2175 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
M2 +
min: 222     avg: 223.8     median: 223 (67%)     max: 229 Points
min: 208     avg: 209     median: 209 (63%)     max: 210 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 44935     avg: 45912     median: 45912 (26%)     max: 46889 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4341     avg: 4476     median: 4476 (54%)     max: 4611 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (12%)     max: 7.57 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
M2 +
min: 540     avg: 620     median: 619.5 (8%)     max: 702 Seconds
min: 545     avg: 611     median: 610.5 (8%)     max: 676 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
M2 +
min: 549     avg: 614     median: 597 (4%)     max: 713 Seconds
min: 313     avg: 334.5     median: 334.5 (2%)     max: 356 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.756     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (16%)     max: 0.77 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14374     avg: 14578     median: 14577.5 (39%)     max: 14781 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8244 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18547     avg: 18734     median: 18734 (33%)     max: 18921 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5015     avg: 5126     median: 5125.5 (22%)     max: 5236 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
M2 +
min: 2587     avg: 2609     median: 2599 (70%)     max: 2650 Points
2454 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
M2 +
min: 10034     avg: 10083     median: 10089 (40%)     max: 10120 Points
min: 14114     avg: 14296     median: 14323.5 (56%)     max: 14422 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
M2 +
min: 1887     avg: 1914     median: 1915.5 (81%)     max: 1953 Points
min: 1669     avg: 1737     median: 1737 (73%)     max: 1805 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
M2 +
min: 8491     avg: 8812     median: 8956 (16%)     max: 8994 Points
min: 8618     avg: 9105     median: 9104.5 (16%)     max: 9591 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
M2 +
min: 440     avg: 450.1     median: 449.2 (1%)     max: 466.8 ms
min: 454.4     avg: 760     median: 759.7 (1%)     max: 1065 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
M2 +
min: 72484     avg: 75019     median: 74878 (66%)     max: 78736 Points
79579 Points (70%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
M2 +
min: 223     avg: 237.8     median: 235 (68%)     max: 256 Points
min: 114.2     avg: 199.6     median: 199.6 (57%)     max: 285 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
M2 +
min: 342     avg: 366.5     median: 376 (78%)     max: 387 Points
min: 134.1     avg: 276.6     median: 276.6 (58%)     max: 419 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1257990     avg: 1337360     median: 1337360 (81%)     max: 1416730 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 M2 +
min: 294643     avg: 298254     median: 298254 (82%)     max: 301865 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
M2 +
min: 1437     avg: 1515     median: 1507 (58%)     max: 1585 Points
min: 978     avg: 1003     median: 1002.5 (38%)     max: 1027 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
44.7 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 +
29 Watt (5%)
65.3 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 6.86     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (4%)     max: 9.71 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2.03     avg: 2.6     median: 2.4 (2%)     max: 3.98 Watt
min: 2.89     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (2%)     max: 3.46 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1.631     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (4%)     max: 5.32 Watt
min: 4.89     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 6.05 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 M2 +
42.4 Points per Watt (32%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 110% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 14:21:10

#0 checking url part for id 14521 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719922870 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14521 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 14521 +0.009s ... 0.018s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.005s ... 0.023s

#9 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.005s ... 0.029s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.055s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.057s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)