Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 vs Apple M2

Apple M2 Pro

► remove from comparison Apple M2 Pro

The Apple M2 Pro is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the early 2023 MacBook Pro 14 and 16-inch models. It offers all 12 cores available in the chip divided in eight performance cores (P-cores) and four power-efficiency cores (E-cores). The E-cores clock with up to 3.4 GHz, the P-Cores up to 3.7 GHz (mostly 3.3 GHz in multi-threaded workloads and 3.4 GHz in single threaded).

The big cores (codename Avalanche) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 36 MB shared L2 cache (up from 24 MB in the M1 Pro). The four efficiency cores (codename Blizzard) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 24 MB SLC (System Level Cache). 

The unified memory (16 or 32 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 256 Bit memory controller (200 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU.

Apple states that the M2 Pro has a 25% higher performance than the M1 Pro in Xcode compiling.

The integrated graphics card in the M1 Pro offers all 19 cores.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine (faster than M1 Pro), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including ProRes).

The M2 Pro is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC (second generation) and integrates 40 billion transistors. 

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-80-100 is the second-fastest member of the Snapdragon X series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at up to 4.0 GHz, the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The faster Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU and the same number of CPU cores but with a higher GPU and CPU clock speeds.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if it is is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The Qualcomm SoC is thought to have at least 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

When all of the 12 cores are under load, they can run at up to 3.4 GHz. The much more desirable 4.0 GHz clock speed is only achievable under single-thread or dual-thread loads.

Given the very similar clock speeds, its multi-thread benchmark scores should be about the same as that of the X1E-78-100 for Ryzen 7 7840U and Apple M3-like performance in most real-world tasks. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the X1E-80-100.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is somewhat underwhelming. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno is not fast enough to outpace the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-80-100 is most likely going to be less power-hungry than its more powerful brother (the latter can be set to consume up to 80 Watts). Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads because that's what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Apple M2

► remove from comparison Apple M2

The Apple M2 is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2022 MacBook Air and, MacBook Pro 13. It offers 8 cores divided in four performance cores and four power-efficiency cores. The big cores offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 16 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB). The four efficiency cores are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with  up to 2,4 GHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with up to 3,5 GHz and therefore higher than the M1 cores. The architecture should be similar to the A15 (iPhone 13) with Avalanche and Blizzard cores.

The chip features a unified memory architecture for the CPU and GPU cores and supports up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 for a bandwidth of up to 100GB/s.

According to Apple, the M2 offers a 18% higher CPU performance at the same power consumption level compared to the Apple M1. In our tests, the MacBook Pro 13 with active cooling was able to reach the 18% in Geekbench Multi. In other benchmarks we measured 12 to 15% gains compared to the M1. Therefore, the performance is now near the M1 Pro with 8 cores. The passively cooled MacBook Air may however suffer from throttling in longer load scenarios.

The integrated graphics card in the M2 offers 8 or 10 cores and a peak performance of 3.6 TFLOPs.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine with a peak performance of 16 TOPS (for AI hardware acceleration), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), Thunderbolt / USB 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders.

The Apple M2 includes 20 billion transistors (up from the 16 billion of the M1) and is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is rated at 20W what we also measured under CPU load.

ModelApple M2 ProQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100Apple M2
SeriesApple Apple M2Qualcomm Snapdragon XApple Apple M2
Series: Apple M2
Apple M2 Max2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro « 2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M22.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 « - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-1008 / 8 cores Oryon
Apple M2 Max2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 « 2.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2424 - 3504 MHz <=4000 MHz2424 - 3480 MHz
L1 Cache3.3 MB2 MB
L2 Cache36 MB20 MB
L3 Cache24 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 1212 / 12
12 x 4.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
8 / 8
Transistors40000 Million20000 Million
Technology5 nm4 nm5 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPUQualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
CodenameOryon
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.apple.com
TDP20 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
37.7 pt (52%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
123 Points (85%)
98%
M2 +
121 Points (84%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1030 Points (19%)
50%
M2 +
513 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14787     avg: 14795     median: 14794.5 (14%)     max: 14802 Points
59%
M2 +
min: 8517     avg: 8654     median: 8667 (8%)     max: 8772 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1647     avg: 1648     median: 1647.5 (70%)     max: 1648 Points
96%
M2 +
min: 1580     avg: 1595     median: 1585 (67%)     max: 1638 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 446     avg: 446.5     median: 446.5 (50%)     max: 447 Points
85%
M2 +
min: 216     avg: 370.8     median: 381 (42%)     max: 446 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4018     avg: 4031     median: 4031 (10%)     max: 4044 Points
58%
M2 +
min: 2231     avg: 2325     median: 2324 (6%)     max: 2416 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2069 Points (13%)
59%
M2 +
min: 1209.9     avg: 1222     median: 1215 (8%)     max: 1243 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
230 Points (69%)
97%
M2 +
min: 222     avg: 223.8     median: 223 (67%)     max: 229 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
44404 MIPS (25%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5359 MIPS (64%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.8 fps (12%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
331 Seconds (4%)
96%
M2 +
min: 540     avg: 620     median: 619.5 (8%)     max: 702 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
351 Seconds (2%)
98%
1 M2 +
min: 549     avg: 614     median: 597 (4%)     max: 713 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 M2 Pro +
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14877 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
18559 Points (33%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2663 Points (72%)
98%
M2 +
min: 2587     avg: 2609     median: 2599 (70%)     max: 2650 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
14568 Points (57%)
69%
M2 +
min: 10034     avg: 10083     median: 10089 (40%)     max: 10120 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 M2 Pro +
min: 1952     avg: 1957     median: 1957 (83%)     max: 1961 Points
98%
1 M2 +
min: 1887     avg: 1914     median: 1915.5 (81%)     max: 1953 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 M2 Pro +
min: 14859     avg: 14961     median: 15010 (27%)     max: 15013 Points
60%
1 M2 +
min: 8491     avg: 8812     median: 8956 (16%)     max: 8994 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
443.8 ms (1%)
100%
M2 +
min: 440     avg: 450.1     median: 449.2 (1%)     max: 466.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
76205 Points (67%)
98%
M2 +
min: 72484     avg: 75019     median: 74878 (66%)     max: 78736 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
253 Points (73%)
93%
M2 +
min: 223     avg: 237.8     median: 235 (68%)     max: 256 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
386 Points (80%)
97%
M2 +
min: 342     avg: 366.5     median: 376 (78%)     max: 387 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1257990     avg: 1337360     median: 1337360 (81%)     max: 1416730 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 M2 +
min: 294643     avg: 298254     median: 298254 (82%)     max: 301865 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1797     avg: 1805     median: 1804.5 (69%)     max: 1812 Points
84%
M2 +
min: 1437     avg: 1515     median: 1507 (58%)     max: 1585 Points
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 +
29 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 6.86     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (4%)     max: 9.71 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4.7 Watt (3%)
102%
1 M2 +
min: 2.03     avg: 2.6     median: 2.4 (2%)     max: 3.98 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.3 Watt (4%)
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1.631     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (4%)     max: 5.32 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 M2 +
42.4 Points per Watt (32%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Pro → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 → 99% n=16

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 → 84% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 02. 14:09:26

#0 checking url part for id 14973 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17575 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14521 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719922166 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14973 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 14973 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17575 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 17575 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14521 +0.001s ... 0.025s

#12 got single benchmarks 14521 +0.008s ... 0.033s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.066s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.066s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)