Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 Max vs Intel Core i5-11320H vs Intel Core i7-11370H

Apple M2 Max

► remove from comparison Apple M2 Max

The Apple M2 Max is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the early 2023 MacBook Pro 14 and 16-inch models. It offers all 12 CPU cores available in the chip divided in eight performance cores (P-cores) and four power-efficiency cores (E-cores). The E-cores clock with up to 3.4 GHz, the P-Cores up to 3.7 GHz (mostly 3.3 GHz in multi-threaded workloads and 3.4 GHz in single threaded).

The big cores (codename Avalanche) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 36 MB shared L2 cache (up from 24 MB in the M1 Pro). The four efficiency cores (codename Blizzard) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 49 MB SLC (System Level Cache). 

The unified memory (32, 64, or 96 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 512 Bit memory controller (400 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU.

The CPU performance should be quite similar to the M2 Pro as only the higher memory bandwidth and bigger L3 cache could make a difference for some workloads.

The integrated graphics card in the M1 Max offers a 30-core GPU or a GPU with all 38 cores.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine (faster than M1 Max), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including ProRes).

The M2 Max is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC (second generation) and integrates 40 billion transistors. The power consumption of the CPU part is up to 36 Watt according to powermetrics. When fully loading the CPU and GPU cores, the chip uses up to 89 Watt and the CPU part is limited to 25 Watt.

Intel Core i5-11320H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11320H

The Intel Core i5-11320H is a mid range SoC for thin and light gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H35 refresh generation and will be announced in Q3 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and can vary from 2.5 (28 W TDP) to 3.2 GHz (35 W). The boost of a single and two cores under load can reach up to 4.5 GHz. All four cores can reach up to 4.3 GHz. The L3 cache is reduced to 8 MB compared to the 12 MB of the higher end i7 models.

Thanks to the improved clock speeds, the performance gap to the faster i7-11370H should be quite small. The i7 still offers higher single and dual core Turbo speeds and more L3 cache.

The SoC also included the improved Xe graphics card with 96 CUs clocked at up to 1350 MHz.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm process (called 10nm SuperFin) at Intel, which should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

 

Intel Core i7-11370H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-11370H

The Intel Core i7-11370H is a quad-core SoC designed for use in ultra-thin gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H35 generation and was announced early 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and can vary from 3 (28 W TDP) to 3.3 GHz (35 W). The boost of a single and two cores under load can reach up to 4.8 GHz. All four cores can reach up to 4.3 GHz. The 11370H can use the whole 12 MB level 3 cache.

The SoC also includes the improved Iris Xe iGPU with all 96 EUs active clocked at up to 1350 MHz.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip.

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Performance

The average 11370H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, a noticeably less power-hungry chip, in multi-thread performance. Disregard the Core i7 moniker; this is essentially a mid-range CPU and no match for the likes of the Core i7-11800H or the Ryzen 9 5900HS.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 25 W, the TUF Dash F15 FX516PR is among the fastest laptops powered by the 11370H that we know of. It can be around 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

The Core i7 has a default TDP of 28 W to 35 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's way too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The i7-11370H is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelApple M2 MaxIntel Core i5-11320HIntel Core i7-11370H
SeriesApple Apple M2Intel Tiger LakeIntel Tiger Lake
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-H35
Apple M2 Max « 2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M22.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11390H3.4 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11375H3.3 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11370H3.3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11320H « 3.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11300H3.1 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11390H3.4 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11375H3.3 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11370H « 3.3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11320H3.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11300H3.1 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2424 - 3696 MHz3200 - 4500 MHz3300 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache3.3 MB320 KB320 KB
L2 Cache36 MB5 MB5 MB
L3 Cache48 MB8 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 124 / 84 / 8
TDP79 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors67000 Million
Technology5 nm10 nm10 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUApple M2 Max 38-Core GPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86x86
Announced
CodenameTiger Lake-H35Tiger Lake-H35
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1449BGA1449
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$426 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11320H
34.3 pt (48%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-11370H
35.7 pt (50%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14738     avg: 14753     median: 14752.5 (14%)     max: 14767 Points
min: 5720     avg: 5869     median: 5852 (5%)     max: 6051 Points
min: 3696     avg: 5563     median: 5712.5 (5%)     max: 6646 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1625     avg: 1644     median: 1643.5 (70%)     max: 1662 Points
min: 1341     avg: 1432     median: 1460.5 (62%)     max: 1467 Points
min: 1081     avg: 1469     median: 1507 (64%)     max: 1556 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 451     avg: 455.5     median: 455.5 (51%)     max: 460 Points
min: 557     avg: 561     median: 560.5 (62%)     max: 567 Points
min: 475     avg: 566     median: 589 (65%)     max: 601 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4044     avg: 4065     median: 4064.5 (10%)     max: 4085 Points
min: 2208     avg: 2273     median: 2267.5 (6%)     max: 2349 Points
min: 1438     avg: 2146     median: 2199 (5%)     max: 2578 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2074     avg: 2084     median: 2084 (13%)     max: 2094 Points
min: 857     avg: 922     median: 905.5 (6%)     max: 1019 Points
min: 606     avg: 946     median: 960 (6%)     max: 1086 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 233     avg: 236     median: 236 (71%)     max: 239 Points
min: 212     avg: 213.8     median: 214 (64%)     max: 215 Points
min: 162.9     avg: 220.1     median: 229 (69%)     max: 233 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.8 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.5 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8767 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
32576 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
42350 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
11457 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
191.4 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5481 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 24718     avg: 25274     median: 24760 (14%)     max: 26858 MIPS
min: 18961     avg: 25340     median: 26791 (15%)     max: 28520 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4813     avg: 4996     median: 5025 (60%)     max: 5119 MIPS
min: 5074     avg: 5290     median: 5307 (63%)     max: 5550 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.25     avg: 7.6     median: 7.6 (13%)     max: 7.91 fps
min: 4.98     avg: 7.2     median: 7.7 (14%)     max: 8.82 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
6.1 GB/s (16%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
326 Seconds (4%)
min: 937     avg: 981     median: 995 (13%)     max: 1010 Seconds
783 Seconds (10%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
333 Seconds (2%)
min: 507     avg: 527     median: 528.5 (4%)     max: 543 Seconds
min: 432     avg: 531     median: 491 (3%)     max: 762 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.581     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.622 sec
min: 0.544     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.596 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10886 Points (23%)
10019 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
389.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
33603 Points (29%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10666     avg: 11575     median: 11487 (31%)     max: 12778 Points
min: 9920     avg: 11762     median: 11719 (32%)     max: 13296 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 66612     avg: 66703     median: 66702.5 (54%)     max: 66793 Points
min: 30507     avg: 49576     median: 39856 (32%)     max: 70781 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 66629     avg: 67222     median: 67221.5 (55%)     max: 67814 Points
min: 39681     avg: 49084     median: 39698 (32%)     max: 67872 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 70639     avg: 70683     median: 70683 (60%)     max: 70727 Points
min: 47633     avg: 66145     median: 71560 (60%)     max: 73828 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8860     avg: 9380     median: 9363 (24%)     max: 10187 Points
min: 8702     avg: 9617     median: 9727 (25%)     max: 10322 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 13123     avg: 13891     median: 13763 (25%)     max: 14950 Points
min: 9829     avg: 13876     median: 14499 (26%)     max: 15138 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4803     avg: 5132     median: 5199 (22%)     max: 5637 Points
min: 3487     avg: 5096     median: 5465.5 (23%)     max: 5811 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 M2 Max +
2692 Points (72%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 M2 Max +
14863 Points (59%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1965     avg: 1970     median: 1967 (83%)     max: 1978 Points
min: 1453     avg: 1497     median: 1505 (64%)     max: 1523 Points
min: 1376     avg: 1540     median: 1556.5 (66%)     max: 1607 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15348     avg: 15388     median: 15373 (28%)     max: 15444 Points
min: 4927     avg: 5375     median: 5308 (10%)     max: 5955 Points
min: 3828     avg: 5258     median: 5388 (10%)     max: 6115 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1453     avg: 1488     median: 1493.5 (6%)     max: 1510 Points
1380 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4864     avg: 5318     median: 5259 (17%)     max: 5890 Points
4911 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6238 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
22045 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 430.2     avg: 437.2     median: 437.2 (1%)     max: 444.2 ms
min: 662     avg: 669     median: 666.5 (1%)     max: 680 ms
min: 618     avg: 635     median: 629 (1%)     max: 657 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 76610     avg: 77676     median: 77676 (68%)     max: 78742 Points
67714 Points (59%)
min: 66039     avg: 68321     median: 68903 (61%)     max: 70020 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 258     avg: 259     median: 259 (74%)     max: 260 Points
min: 202     avg: 204.7     median: 206 (59%)     max: 206 Points
205 Points (59%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 402     avg: 404.5     median: 404.5 (84%)     max: 407 Points
min: 243     avg: 258.3     median: 260.5 (54%)     max: 269 Points
min: 248     avg: 259.5     median: 263 (55%)     max: 270 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1759     avg: 1835     median: 1834.5 (70%)     max: 1910 Points
min: 1300     avg: 1331     median: 1326 (51%)     max: 1371 Points
min: 1233     avg: 1377     median: 1386 (53%)     max: 1502 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 52.5     avg: 54.2     median: 52.8 (9%)     max: 58.6 Watt
min: 36.5     avg: 56.1     median: 59 (10%)     max: 69.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 Max +
72.8 Watt (13%)
min: 47.3     avg: 53.5     median: 51 (9%)     max: 64.5 Watt
min: 43.1     avg: 61.6     median: 62.5 (11%)     max: 80.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 Max +
9.2 Watt (6%)
min: 8.12     avg: 8.1     median: 8.1 (5%)     max: 8.16 Watt
4.8 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.4 Watt (7%)
min: 5.42     avg: 7.6     median: 7.6 (8%)     max: 9.84 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 M2 Max +
28.5 Points per Watt (21%)
min: 15.8     avg: 17.4     median: 17.3 (13%)     max: 19.2 Points per Watt
min: 13.3     avg: 16.8     median: 15.8 (12%)     max: 23.6 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Max → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11320H → 76% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-11370H → 78% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 04. 01:26:05

#0 checking url part for id 14975 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13169 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13071 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720049165 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14975 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14975 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13169 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 13169 +0.008s ... 0.026s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13071 +0.004s ... 0.03s

#12 got single benchmarks 13071 +0.017s ... 0.048s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.053s ... 0.1s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.101s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)