Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 Max vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

Apple M2 Max

► remove from comparison Apple M2 Max

The Apple M2 Max is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the early 2023 MacBook Pro 14 and 16-inch models. It offers all 12 CPU cores available in the chip divided in eight performance cores (P-cores) and four power-efficiency cores (E-cores). The E-cores clock with up to 3.4 GHz, the P-Cores up to 3.7 GHz (mostly 3.3 GHz in multi-threaded workloads and 3.4 GHz in single threaded).

The big cores (codename Avalanche) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 36 MB shared L2 cache (up from 24 MB in the M1 Pro). The four efficiency cores (codename Blizzard) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 49 MB SLC (System Level Cache). 

The unified memory (32, 64, or 96 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 512 Bit memory controller (400 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU.

The CPU performance should be quite similar to the M2 Pro as only the higher memory bandwidth and bigger L3 cache could make a difference for some workloads.

The integrated graphics card in the M1 Max offers a 30-core GPU or a GPU with all 38 cores.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine (faster than M1 Max), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including ProRes).

The M2 Max is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC (second generation) and integrates 40 billion transistors. The power consumption of the CPU part is up to 36 Watt according to powermetrics. When fully loading the CPU and GPU cores, the chip uses up to 89 Watt and the CPU part is limited to 25 Watt.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-78-100 is the least powerful member of the Snapdragon X Elite processor series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The top dog, known as the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if the X Elite is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Our first benchmarks (featuring a 35 W X Elite X1E-78-100) revealed very decent CPU performance figures that see the X Elite going head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. It's also not much faster or slower than the Apple M3 chip with 10 GPU cores. While not groundbreaking, this should be good enough for the user to be able to run any applications in 2024 and 2025.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that's good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming according to our in-house testing results. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno fails to outgun the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-78-100 is set to be slightly less power-hungry than its more powerful brothers. Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and on the performance profile chosen. That's exactly what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-80-100 is the second-fastest member of the Snapdragon X series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at up to 4.0 GHz, the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The faster Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU and the same number of CPU cores but with a higher GPU and CPU clock speeds.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if it is is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The Qualcomm SoC is thought to have at least 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

When all of the 12 cores are under load, they can run at up to 3.4 GHz. The much more desirable 4.0 GHz clock speed is only achievable under single-thread or dual-thread loads.

Given the very similar clock speeds, its multi-thread benchmark scores should be about the same as that of the X1E-78-100 for Ryzen 7 7840U and Apple M3-like performance in most real-world tasks. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the X1E-80-100.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is somewhat underwhelming. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno is not fast enough to outpace the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-80-100 is most likely going to be less power-hungry than its more powerful brother (the latter can be set to consume up to 80 Watts). Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads because that's what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelApple M2 MaxQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
SeriesApple Apple M2Qualcomm Snapdragon XQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Apple M2 Max « 2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M22.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 « - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-1008 / 8 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 « - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-1008 / 8 cores Oryon
Clock2424 - 3696 MHz <=3400 MHz <=4000 MHz
L1 Cache3.3 MB
L2 Cache36 MB
L3 Cache48 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 1212 / 12
8 x 3.4 GHz
4 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
12 / 12
12 x 4.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP79 Watt35 Watt
Transistors67000 Million
Technology5 nm4 nm4 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUApple M2 Max 38-Core GPUQualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
CodenameOryonOryon
TDP Turbo PL245 Watt80 Watt
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
34.5 pt (48%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
37.7 pt (52%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102.8     avg: 105.4     median: 105.4 (73%)     max: 108 Points
123 Points (85%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 768     avg: 935     median: 956 (18%)     max: 1132 Points
893 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14738     avg: 14753     median: 14752.5 (14%)     max: 14767 Points
min: 10856     avg: 10908     median: 10908 (10%)     max: 10960 Points
9927 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1625     avg: 1644     median: 1643.5 (70%)     max: 1662 Points
min: 1111     avg: 1121     median: 1120.5 (48%)     max: 1130 Points
1321 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 451     avg: 455.5     median: 455.5 (51%)     max: 460 Points
min: 416     avg: 418     median: 418 (46%)     max: 420 Points
490 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4044     avg: 4065     median: 4064.5 (10%)     max: 4085 Points
min: 4033     avg: 4081     median: 4080.5 (10%)     max: 4128 Points
3640 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2074     avg: 2084     median: 2084 (13%)     max: 2094 Points
min: 1984     avg: 2080     median: 2079.5 (13%)     max: 2175 Points
2249 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 233     avg: 236     median: 236 (71%)     max: 239 Points
min: 208     avg: 209     median: 209 (63%)     max: 210 Points
248 Points (75%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 44935     avg: 45912     median: 45912 (26%)     max: 46889 MIPS
44404 MIPS (25%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4341     avg: 4476     median: 4476 (54%)     max: 4611 MIPS
5359 MIPS (64%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (12%)     max: 7.57 fps
6.8 fps (12%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
326 Seconds (4%)
min: 545     avg: 611     median: 610.5 (8%)     max: 676 Seconds
637 Seconds (8%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
333 Seconds (2%)
min: 313     avg: 334.5     median: 334.5 (2%)     max: 356 Seconds
351 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.756     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (16%)     max: 0.77 sec
0.6 sec (14%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14374     avg: 14578     median: 14577.5 (39%)     max: 14781 Points
14877 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8244 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18547     avg: 18734     median: 18734 (33%)     max: 18921 Points
18559 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5015     avg: 5126     median: 5125.5 (22%)     max: 5236 Points
5323 Points (22%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2692 Points (72%)
min: 2354     avg: 2404     median: 2404 (65%)     max: 2454 Points
2845 Points (77%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
14863 Points (59%)
14458 Points (57%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 M2 Max +
min: 1965     avg: 1970     median: 1967 (83%)     max: 1978 Points
min: 1669     avg: 1737     median: 1737 (73%)     max: 1805 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 M2 Max +
min: 15348     avg: 15388     median: 15373 (28%)     max: 15444 Points
min: 8618     avg: 9105     median: 9104.5 (16%)     max: 9591 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 430.2     avg: 437.2     median: 437.2 (1%)     max: 444.2 ms
min: 454.4     avg: 457.1     median: 457.1 (1%)     max: 459.8 ms
400.3 ms (0%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 76610     avg: 77676     median: 77676 (68%)     max: 78742 Points
79579 Points (70%)
92123 Points (81%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 258     avg: 259     median: 259 (74%)     max: 260 Points
min: 285     avg: 285.5     median: 285.5 (82%)     max: 286 Points
295 Points (85%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 402     avg: 404.5     median: 404.5 (84%)     max: 407 Points
min: 395     avg: 407     median: 407 (85%)     max: 419 Points
435 Points (91%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1759     avg: 1835     median: 1834.5 (70%)     max: 1910 Points
min: 978     avg: 1003     median: 1002.5 (38%)     max: 1027 Points
1443 Points (55%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
44.7 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 Max +
72.8 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 Max +
9.2 Watt (6%)
min: 2.89     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (2%)     max: 3.46 Watt
4.7 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.89     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 6.05 Watt
3.3 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 M2 Max +
28.5 Points per Watt (21%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Max → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 91% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 → 98% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 04. 16:37:56

#0 checking url part for id 14975 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17575 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720103876 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14975 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 14975 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.005s ... 0.024s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 17575 +0.004s ... 0.028s

#12 got single benchmarks 17575 +0.004s ... 0.032s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.035s ... 0.067s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)