Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 8-Core GPU vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU

Apple M2 8-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M2 8-Core GPU

The Apple M2 8-core GPU is an integrated graphics card offering 8 of the 10 cores designed by Apple and integrated in the Apple M2 SoC. It uses the unified memory architecture of the M2 SoC (up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 with 100 GB/s bandwidth) and should offer 128 execution units.

The performance is positioned right between the old 8-core model in the M1 GPU and the higher end 10-core model in the M2. The theoretical performance should be around 2.9 Teraflops, as the 8-core version offers the same 1,398 MHz maximum clock rate as the 10-core version. Compared to other iGPUs from AMD and Intel, the M2 benefits greatly from the unified memory architecture and the high bandwidth.

The M2 chip is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is around 10 Watt (in our tests under load of the MBP13) compared to the 13.5W of the 10-core version.

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU

The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU or A4500 Mobile is a professional graphics card for mobile workstations. It is based on the GA104 Ampere chip and similar to the consumer GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU. It offers 5,888 graphics cores, 46 RT cores, 184 Tensor cores and up to 16 GB GDDR6 graphics memory with a 256 Bit memory bus. It supports PCIe 4.0 and will be available in different variants from 80 to 140 Watt (TGP) with different clock speeds (and performance). The GPU supports eDP 1.4b to connect the internal monitor and DisplayPort 1.4 and HDMI 2.1 for external connections.

There is no more Max-Q variant (formerly used for the low power variants) but every OEM can choose to implement Max-Q technologies (Dynamic Boost, WhisperMode).

The raw performance should be similar to the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti laptop at the same TGP level. Both GPUs depend heavily on good cooling and a high TGP for good performance. At a similar power consumption level the RTX A4500 should be clearly faster than the old RTX A4000 and Quadro RTX 4000. The desktop variant of the A4500 however, is a lot faster.

The GA104 chip offers 6,144 FP32 ALUs of which half can also execute INT32 instructions (i.e. 3,072 INT32 ALUs). With Ampere all shaders could still execute FP32 or INT32 instructions. The raytracing and tensor cores on the chip were also improved according to Nvidia. The A4400 only uses 5,888 of the 6,144 CUDA cores. The Ampere chips also include an improved 5th generation video encoder (NVENC for H.264 and H.265) and a 7th generation decoder (for various formats now including AV1).

The GA104 chip is manufactured by Samsung in 8nm (8N), which is not quite able to keep up with the 7nm node at TSMC (e.g. used by AMD and also for the professional GA100 Ampere chip).

Apple M2 8-Core GPUNVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
RTX A Series
M2 Max 38-Core GPU compare 38
M2 Max 30-Core GPU compare 30
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU compare 19 @ 0.44 - 1.4 GHz
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU compare 16
M2 10-Core GPU compare 10 @ 1.4 GHz
M2 8-Core GPU 8 @ 1.4 GHz
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU compare 7424 256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU 5888 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU compare 6144 @ 1.22 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU compare 5120 @ 0.78 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU compare 4096 @ 1.08 - 1.56 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU compare 2560 @ 0.89 - 1.69 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU compare 2048 128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A500 Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Pipelines8 - unified5888 - unified
Core Speed1398 (Boost) MHz930 - 1500 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5-6400GDDR6
Shared Memorynono
Power Consumption10 Watt140 Watt (80 - 140 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm8 nm
Date of Announcement06.06.2022 30.03.2022
PredecessorM1 8-Core GPURTX A4000 Laptop GPU
CodenameGA104
ArchitectureAmpere
TMUs184
ROPs96
Raytracing Cores46
Tensor / AI Cores127
Theoretical Performance18.5 TFLOPS FP32
CacheL2: 4 MB
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Memory Bandwidth512 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
PCIe4.0 x16
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, PCIe 4.0 x16, 17.8 SP-FP TFLOPS Peak, 143 Tensor Performance Peak, up to 384 GB/s Memory Bandwidth, Resizable BAR, Support for Modern Standby
Notebook Sizelarge
Link to Manufacturer Pagenvdam.widen.net

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
21009 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
5689 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 8-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
128.6 fps (8%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 8-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
39.8 fps (16%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
91 fps (17%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
247 fps (18%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
199.9 fps (23%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
306.9 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
483.7 fps (28%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 8-Core GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
839 fps (7%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
24.4 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
27.4 Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 8-Core GPU → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
43  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
29.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
16.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
13.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
77  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
39  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
18  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
14  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
62  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
28  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
24  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
20  fps

Average Gaming Apple M2 8-Core GPU → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Apple M2 8-Core GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Borderlands 34329.716.613.4
Total War: Three Kingdoms77391814
Shadow of the Tomb Raider62282420
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2
2
1

3


3








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 05. 01:14:41

#0 checking url part for id 11375 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11318 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720134881 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.054s ... 0.055s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.055s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11375 +0.018s ... 0.073s

#8 got single benchmarks 11375 +0.003s ... 0.076s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11318 +0s ... 0.077s

#10 got single benchmarks 11318 +0.002s ... 0.079s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.085s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.085s

#14 Got 24 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.087s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.087s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.087s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.088s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.088s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)