Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 10-Core GPU vs Qualcomm Adreno 530

Apple M2 10-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M2 10-Core GPU

The Apple M2 GPU is an integrated graphics card offering 10 cores designed by Apple and integrated in the Apple M2 SoC. It uses the unified memory architecture of the M2 SoC (up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 with 100 GB/s bandwidth) and should offer 160 execution units.

According to Apple it offers a 25% higher performance at slightly higher power consumption. The theoretical performance is rated at 3.6 Teraflops and therefore 1 TFLOP higher than the M1 8-core GPU. In our benchmarks, the GPU was able to top the M1 with up to 40%, but still stays behind the 14-core GPU in the M1 Pro. Compared to other iGPUs from AMD and Intel, the M2 benefits greatly from the unified memory architecture and the high bandwidth.

The M2 chip is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is around 13.5 Watt (in our tests under load of the MBP13) and up to 15W according to Apple.

Qualcomm Adreno 530

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 530

The Qualcomm Adreno 530 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in the last quarter of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 SoC. It supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.1.

The GPU uses a still unknown amount of unified shaders clocked at up to 624 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. Compared to the predecessor Adreno 430, the 530 is especially faster in demanding benchmarks.

Apple M2 10-Core GPUQualcomm Adreno 530
Adreno 500 Series
M2 Max 38-Core GPU compare 38
M2 Max 30-Core GPU compare 30
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU compare 19 @ 0.44 - 1.4 GHz
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU compare 16
M2 10-Core GPU 10 @ 1.4 GHz
M2 8-Core GPU compare 8 @ 1.4 GHz
Adreno 540 compare @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512 compare
Adreno 510 compare
Adreno 509 compare
Adreno 508 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Pipelines10 - unified
Core Speed1398 (Boost) MHz624 MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5-6400
Shared Memorynoyes
Power Consumption15 Watt
technology5 nm14 nm
Date of Announcement06.06.2022 15.12.2015
PredecessorM1 8-Core GPU
APIDirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.1 AEP
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1 AEP, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1 (FL 11_1)
CPU in M2 10-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M28 x 2424 MHz, 20 W? MHz1398 MHz
CPU in Adreno 530GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro4 x 2400 MHz? MHz653 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM89964 x 2200 MHz? MHz624 MHz
min. - max.? MHz624 - 1398 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 24310     avg: 32869     median: 32997 (4%)     max: 40761 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3401     avg: 4503     median: 4661.5 (10%)     max: 5006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2488     avg: 2996     median: 3108 (9%)     max: 3253 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 21302     avg: 23924     median: 24236 (12%)     max: 25317 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5328     avg: 6533     median: 6823.5 (8%)     max: 6987 Points
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom METAL *
min: 205     avg: 221     median: 221 (23%)     max: 237 Seconds
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 128.65     avg: 132.8     median: 131 (8%)     max: 140.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35.6     avg: 43.9     median: 47.9 (19%)     max: 48.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 68     avg: 96     median: 102.6 (19%)     max: 110 fps
min: 7.1     avg: 8.4     median: 7.2 (1%)     max: 11 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 208     avg: 267.5     median: 283.8 (21%)     max: 296 fps
min: 15     avg: 17.7     median: 19 (1%)     max: 19 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 136     avg: 197.6     median: 206.1 (23%)     max: 232 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 247     avg: 318.6     median: 331.5 (7%)     max: 374.6 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 411     avg: 503     median: 509.5 (30%)     max: 557.2 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 628     avg: 824     median: 891.5 (7%)     max: 931.9 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 654168     avg: 728087     median: 728086 (91%)     max: 802005 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 21420     avg: 30602     median: 33028 (75%)     max: 35449 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 28538     avg: 37215     median: 38353 (85%)     max: 41500 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 27880     avg: 27900     median: 27900 (8%)     max: 27920 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Metal
min: 42013     avg: 44473     median: 45460 (29%)     max: 45946 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 4781     avg: 5512     median: 5612.5 (6%)     max: 6042 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1913     avg: 2183     median: 2178.5 (4%)     max: 2461 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4410 Points (96%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.8     avg: 27.8     median: 26.9 (4%)     max: 34.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 27.8     avg: 32.5     median: 30.8 (7%)     max: 38.9 Watt
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 16     avg: 16.5     median: 16.7 (6%)     max: 16.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 1.007     avg: 1     median: 1 (91%)     max: 1.108 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 1.116     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (92%)     max: 1.207 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
34.6 dB(A) (55%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 10-Core GPU → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 8% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
ultra Ultra
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
59.3  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
118.8  fps
ultra
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
58.5  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
ultra
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
65  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
118.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
53.1 66.8 73 ~ 64 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
34 34.2 36 ~ 35 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
22 23.8 28 ~ 25 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
15 16.4 17.6 ~ 16 fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
88.6 89 136 138 ~ 113 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
39 45.3 46.3 47 ~ 44 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
22 26.3 29 29.5 ~ 27 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
15.9 16 21 21.3 ~ 19 fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
60 76 102 ~ 79 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
28 31 39 40 ~ 35 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
25 27 36 36 ~ 31 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
21 23 31 32 ~ 27 fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
20  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
high
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
39.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
34  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
28  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 530:
0 (!) 30 30 30 30 56 58 59 59 60 60 ~ 43 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Adreno 530:
29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
67.7  fps
43%
Adreno 530:
0 (!) 29 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 48 ~ 29 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
44.2  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
Adreno 530:
60  fps
high
Adreno 530:
35 51 ~ 43 fps

Average Gaming Apple M2 10-Core GPU → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 43%

Apple M2 10-Core GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal59.3
Call of Duty Mobile118.858.5
Genshin Impact65
Armajet118.4
Borderlands 364352516
Total War: Three Kingdoms113442719
Shadow of the Tomb Raider7935312720
PUBG Mobile39.8
The Witcher 33428
Asphalt 8: Airborne67.7
Asphalt 9: Legends44.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4

3

2
4
2
4
2
1
1





Qualcomm Adreno 530lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 243
Asphalt 8: Airborne3029
Real Racing 36043
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1



1
2










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 03:55:33

#0 checking url part for id 11368 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7062 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719885332 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:16:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.053s ... 0.053s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.053s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11368 +0.02s ... 0.073s

#8 got single benchmarks 11368 +0.008s ... 0.081s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7062 +0s ... 0.082s

#10 got single benchmarks 7062 +0.019s ... 0.101s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.101s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.103s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.104s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.125s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.125s

#16 Got 95 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.137s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.137s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.139s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.146s

#20 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.146s

#21 return log +0.002s ... 0.148s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)