Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 910T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A

HiSilicon Kirin 910T

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 910T is an ARM based quad core SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. As HiSilicon is fully owned by Huawei, the chip is mostly used in Huawei models like the MediaPad X1, P6 S, MediaPad M1 and Honor 3C 4G). The SoC integrates four Cortex-A9 cores (at 1.8 GHz max.), a ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU (at 533 MHz), a 32-bit single-channel LPDDR3-1600 memory controller (533 MHz) and a LTE Cat. 4 radio. The similar named HiSilicon Kirin 910 is a 200 MHz slower clocked (CPU) version.

At the time of announcement in mid 2014, the CPU performance of the Kirin910T is in the mid-range of smartphone and tablet SoCs. The power consumption is a bit higher than usual, as the CPU cores are rather high clocked.

Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A

► remove from comparison Qualcomm S4 Plus MSM8260A

The Qualcomm MSM8260A (Snapdragon S4 series) is a ARM based high-end smartphone SoC in 2012. It contains two Krait (ARMv7) CPU cores at 1.5 - 1.7 GHz, a Adreno 225 GPU (400 MHz), a LPDDR2 memory controller (up to 500 MHz) and radio elements.  The chip is produced in 28nm LP (low power process) at TSMC. Compared to the MSM8960, the 8260A does not support LTE.

The Krait cores offer a slightly better performance as the standard Cortex-A9 cores and are compatible to the NEON SIMD extensions.

show full text
ModelHiSilicon Kirin 910TQualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A
Series Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A9ARMv7
Series: Snapdragon ARMv7
HiSilicon Kirin 910T « 1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8028 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960T compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A « 1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8230 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227 compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8660 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8260 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8250 compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores ARMv7
Clock1800 MHz1700 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesARMv7, Mali-450 MP4 (533 MHz), LTE (Cat. 4), Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (6.4 GB/s)HSPA+, EDGE, GSM, GPRS, GPS, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, FM
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
L1 Cache64 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 225 (400 MHz)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
11572 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11485 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13330 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1796 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
599 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 323     avg: 514     median: 598 (5%)     max: 622 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1655     avg: 1670     median: 1673 (15%)     max: 1681 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 259     avg: 1604     median: 2254 (4%)     max: 2298 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 685     avg: 891     median: 970 (2%)     max: 1017 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 693     avg: 1258     median: 1525 (4%)     max: 1556 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
254 MFLOPS (9%)
min: 167.2     avg: 175.4     median: 172.5 (6%)     max: 186.4 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
83.2 MFLOPS (8%)
min: 91     avg: 96.2     median: 95 (9%)     max: 102.5 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
16135 ms (19%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1043 ms (11%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 896     avg: 1487     median: 1624 (15%)     max: 1804 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
2775 Points (2%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
7189 points (17%)
4527 points (10%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
23864 Points (56%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
584 Iter./s (18%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
13307 Iter./s (44%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
12178 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 910T → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A → 82% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 17:08:38

#0 checking url part for id 6191 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3213 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720105718 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6191 +0.001s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 6191 +0.004s ... 0.037s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3213 +0.001s ... 0.038s

#9 got single benchmarks 3213 +0.004s ... 0.042s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.056s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.058s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)