Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 9000W vs UNISOC Tangula T700

HiSilicon Kirin 9000W

► remove from comparison  Kirin 9000W

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000W is an SoC that can be used in smartphones and tablets based on Android and was first installed in the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2.

Huawei does not reveal any information about the SoC. The little information that is available comes from benchmarks and system analysis tools. The CPU consists of three clusters with a total of 12 cores. The power-saving cluster has four ARM Cortex-A510 cores, each operating at up to 1,530 MHz, while six other cores use unspecified cores from HiSilicon (0x0D42) and clock at up to 2,150 MHz. The third cluster contains two HiSilicon cores (0x0D02), each with a maximum clock speed of 2,487 MHz. The performance cores could possibly be based on the TaiShan V120 architecture (as in the Kirin 9000S).

The single-core performance is correspondingly mixed, but the multi-core performance is at the level of a high-end SoC from 2022 due to the numerous cores.

A Maleoon 910 by HiSilicon is integrated as the graphics unit, similar to the 9000S (where it was clocked with up to 750MHz).

Nothing concrete is known about the manufacturing process or the architecture. The SoC will probably be manufactured in 7 nm at SMIC.

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison  Tangula T700

The Unisoc Tangula T700 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), an ARM Mali G52MP2 GPU and a tri core ISP. Furthermore, the T700 supports 90 Hz displays.

The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 9000WUNISOC Tangula T700
Series
Series: Cortex-A75 / A55
newitem compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W « 1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 « 1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1530 - 2490 MHz1800 - 1800 MHz
Cores / Threads12 / 12
2 x 2.5 GHz
6 x 2.2 GHz
4 x 1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
8 / 8
Technology7 nm12 nm
iGPUHiSilicon Maleoon 910ARM Mali-G52 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
0.5 pt (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5690 Points (67%)
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (34%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
5614 Points (64%)
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (33%)     max: 2961 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1174 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
4088 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
867 Points (37%)
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (15%)     max: 356 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3878 Points (7%)
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (2%)     max: 1393 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4712 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
13978 Points (15%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1202 ms (1%)
3722 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
203.8 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
33982 Points (30%)
10382 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
99 Points (28%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
67597 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
186885 Points (18%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
655341 Points (40%)
164867 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
182634 Points (50%)
65438 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
2078 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
110.5 MB/s (81%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
1435 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
63.2 MB/s (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1522 MB/s (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
45015 Points (71%)
10033 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
10620 Points (49%)
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (40%)     max: 8746 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5412 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
12328 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
8438 Points (55%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
834 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
8.2 Watt (4%)
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (2%)     max: 8.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.2 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 9000W → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 47% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 08:47:37

#0 checking url part for id 17388 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720075657 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17388 +0.001s ... 0.031s

#7 got single benchmarks 17388 +0.004s ... 0.035s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.003s ... 0.039s

#9 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.004s ... 0.043s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.062s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)