Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 9000W vs UNISOC T618

HiSilicon Kirin 9000W

► remove from comparison  Kirin 9000W

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000W is an SoC that can be used in smartphones and tablets based on Android and was first installed in the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2.

Huawei does not reveal any information about the SoC. The little information that is available comes from benchmarks and system analysis tools. The CPU consists of three clusters with a total of 12 cores. The power-saving cluster has four ARM Cortex-A510 cores, each operating at up to 1,530 MHz, while six other cores use unspecified cores from HiSilicon (0x0D42) and clock at up to 2,150 MHz. The third cluster contains two HiSilicon cores (0x0D02), each with a maximum clock speed of 2,487 MHz. The performance cores could possibly be based on the TaiShan V120 architecture (as in the Kirin 9000S).

The single-core performance is correspondingly mixed, but the multi-core performance is at the level of a high-end SoC from 2022 due to the numerous cores.

A Maleoon 910 by HiSilicon is integrated as the graphics unit, similar to the 9000S (where it was clocked with up to 750MHz).

Nothing concrete is known about the manufacturing process or the architecture. The SoC will probably be manufactured in 7 nm at SMIC.

UNISOC T618

► remove from comparison  T618

The Unisoc Tiger T618 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 2 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 2 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes an LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4x-1866 memory controller and an ARM Mali G52MP2 GPU and a tri core ISP. The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET. AI acceleration is handled by a visual digital signal processor (VDSP) clocked at up to 936 MHz.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 9000WUNISOC T618
Series
Series: Cortex-A75 / A55
newitem compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W « 1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 « 2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1530 - 2490 MHz2000 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads12 / 12
2 x 2.5 GHz
6 x 2.2 GHz
4 x 1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
8 / 8
Technology7 nm12 nm
iGPUHiSilicon Maleoon 910ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (850 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55
L3 Cache1 MB
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - T618
0.5 pt (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T618 +
22763 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5690 Points (67%)
min: 2526     avg: 2954     median: 3004.5 (35%)     max: 3202 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
5614 Points (64%)
min: 2611     avg: 2910     median: 2961 (34%)     max: 3148 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1174 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
4088 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
867 Points (37%)
min: 365     avg: 380.2     median: 382 (16%)     max: 393 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3878 Points (7%)
min: 1229     avg: 1332     median: 1325.5 (2%)     max: 1461 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4712 Points (47%)
1911 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
13978 Points (15%)
5744 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1202 ms (1%)
min: 2762     avg: 2962     median: 2874.2 (3%)     max: 3432 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
203.8 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
33982 Points (30%)
min: 10787     avg: 12599     median: 12356.5 (11%)     max: 14722 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
99 Points (28%)
58 Points (17%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T618 +
min: 68     avg: 75.7     median: 74.5 (16%)     max: 93 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 T618 +
min: 38514     avg: 46604     median: 40597 (34%)     max: 60702 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 T618 +
min: 31976     avg: 38448     median: 40494 (33%)     max: 42875 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 T618 +
min: 32932     avg: 39187     median: 40289 (7%)     max: 44339 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 T618 +
min: 62476     avg: 65538     median: 66592 (24%)     max: 67546 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 T618 +
min: 173051     avg: 189777     median: 192320 (19%)     max: 203961 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
655341 Points (40%)
min: 201310     avg: 218309     median: 213115 (13%)     max: 240502 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
182634 Points (50%)
min: 67085     avg: 69141     median: 68306 (19%)     max: 72033 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
110.5 MB/s (81%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
1435 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
63.2 MB/s (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1522 MB/s (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
45015 Points (71%)
min: 9058     avg: 10105     median: 10105 (16%)     max: 11152 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
10620 Points (49%)
min: 7404     avg: 7980     median: 8273 (38%)     max: 8414 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 T618 +
5739 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 T618 +
min: 82     avg: 3510     median: 3509.5 (23%)     max: 6937 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 T618 +
12638 Points (63%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
834 Points (32%)
min: 359     avg: 372.3     median: 372.5 (14%)     max: 385 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
8.2 Watt (4%)
101%
1 T618 +
min: 4.22     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (2%)     max: 6.22 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.2 Watt (5%)
103%
1 T618 +
min: 1.179     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.42 Watt

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 9000W → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T618 → 48% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 08:56:57

#0 checking url part for id 17388 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12997 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720076217 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17388 +0.001s ... 0.031s

#7 got single benchmarks 17388 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12997 +0.004s ... 0.038s

#9 got single benchmarks 12997 +0.007s ... 0.045s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.02s ... 0.065s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.069s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.071s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)