Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 9000W vs UNISOC T612

HiSilicon Kirin 9000W

► remove from comparison  Kirin 9000W

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000W is an SoC that can be used in smartphones and tablets based on Android and was first installed in the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2.

Huawei does not reveal any information about the SoC. The little information that is available comes from benchmarks and system analysis tools. The CPU consists of three clusters with a total of 12 cores. The power-saving cluster has four ARM Cortex-A510 cores, each operating at up to 1,530 MHz, while six other cores use unspecified cores from HiSilicon (0x0D42) and clock at up to 2,150 MHz. The third cluster contains two HiSilicon cores (0x0D02), each with a maximum clock speed of 2,487 MHz. The performance cores could possibly be based on the TaiShan V120 architecture (as in the Kirin 9000S).

The single-core performance is correspondingly mixed, but the multi-core performance is at the level of a high-end SoC from 2022 due to the numerous cores.

A Maleoon 910 by HiSilicon is integrated as the graphics unit, similar to the 9000S (where it was clocked with up to 750MHz).

Nothing concrete is known about the manufacturing process or the architecture. The SoC will probably be manufactured in 7 nm at SMIC.

UNISOC T612

► remove from comparison  T612

The Unisoc Tiger T612 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4/4X-1600 memory controller, an ARM Mali G52MP1 GPU at 614 MHz and a tri core ISP (24, 8 and 8 MPixels max). Compared to the older Unisoc T610, the T612 offers one GPU core less (G52 MC1 versus MC2).

The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 9000WUNISOC T612
Series
Series: Cortex-A75 / A55
newitem compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W « 1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1530 - 2490 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads12 / 12
2 x 2.5 GHz
6 x 2.2 GHz
4 x 1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
8 / 8
Technology7 nm12 nm
iGPUHiSilicon Maleoon 910ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (614 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55
L3 Cache1 MB
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
Manufacturerwww.unisoc.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5690 Points (67%)
min: 2909     avg: 2944     median: 2939 (35%)     max: 2990 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
5614 Points (64%)
min: 2933     avg: 2938     median: 2937.5 (34%)     max: 2942 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1174 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
4088 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
867 Points (37%)
min: 344     avg: 346     median: 346 (15%)     max: 347 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3878 Points (7%)
min: 1311     avg: 1340     median: 1323 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4712 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
13978 Points (15%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T612 +
5404 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T612 +
1598 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1202 ms (1%)
2973 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
203.8 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
33982 Points (30%)
12581 Points (11%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
99 Points (28%)
46 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T612 +
73 Points (15%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
655341 Points (40%)
196368 Points (12%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
182634 Points (50%)
68374 Points (19%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 T612 +
2969 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
110.5 MB/s (81%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
1435 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
63.2 MB/s (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1522 MB/s (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
45015 Points (71%)
min: 11681     avg: 13404     median: 13404 (21%)     max: 15127 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
10620 Points (49%)
min: 6566     avg: 7419     median: 7610 (35%)     max: 7776 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
834 Points (32%)
365 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
8.2 Watt (4%)
101%
1 T612 +
min: 3.37     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 6.99 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.2 Watt (5%)
103%
1 T612 +
min: 1.121     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.68 Watt

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 9000W → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T612 → 48% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 08:57:51

#0 checking url part for id 17388 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14386 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720076271 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17388 +0.001s ... 0.031s

#7 got single benchmarks 17388 +0.004s ... 0.035s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14386 +0.001s ... 0.035s

#9 got single benchmarks 14386 +0.006s ... 0.041s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.059s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.062s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)