Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429

HiSilicon Kirin 650

► remove from comparison  Kirin 650

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2 GHz (performance cores). Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC.

The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster.

The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

 

Qualcomm Snapdragon 429

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 429

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 is an ARM-based entry level SoC for tablets and smartphones (mostly Android based). It was announced in mid 2018 and integrates four 64-Bit Cortex-A53 CPU cores (quad-core) that clock with up to 2 GHz. Furthermore, there is a Adreno 504 graphics card, a LPDDR3 memory controller (max. 933 MHz) and wireless radios for WiFi and 4G/LTE included in the chip.

The Cortex-A53 is the successor of the entry level Cortex-A7 CPU cores. The A53 is now capable of 64 Bit (ARMv8-ISA) and addressing more than 4 GB RAM. According to ARM the performance per MHz is a lot better and even surpasses a Cortex-A9 core.

The integrated Adreno 504 ist the integrated graphics card that supports OpenGL ES 3.1 / 3.2 and Vulkan 1.0. According to Qualcomm, the GPU is 50% faster than the previous Adreno 308 in the Snapdragon 425.

The integrated wireless radios support WiFi 802.11ac Wave 2, Bluetooth 5.0, GPS/GLONASS/Baidou, 2G, 3G and 4G (LTE Cat.4 / Cat.5 - 150 Mbits download, 75 Mbits upload) standards. Futhermore, the SoC is able to decode 1080p videos in H.265 (encode only in H.264) and cameras with up to 13 MP.

The power consumption of the chip is ranging in the lower range, and therefore it is also suited for smaller smartphones. It is manufactured in the modern 12nm process.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 650Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
Series Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2000 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology16 nm12 nm
FeaturesARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory ControllerWLAN 802.11ac Wave 2 (WiFi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, X6 LTE (Cat 4 150 MBps Down, Cat 5 75 MBps Up), Hexagon 536 DSP, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, USB 2.0, H.265 (HEVC), H.264 (AVC), VP8, LPDDR3 933 MHz Memory Controller, eMMC 5.1 Quick Charge 3.0
iGPUARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 504
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 429
0.2 pt (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11640 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13588     avg: 13632     median: 13632 (11%)     max: 13676 Points
min: 15709     avg: 16114     median: 16113.5 (14%)     max: 16518 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1440 Points (17%)
min: 1155     avg: 1194     median: 1194 (14%)     max: 1233 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 429 +
min: 1145     avg: 1170     median: 1170 (13%)     max: 1195 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 429 +
168 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 429 +
566 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 429 +
168 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 429 +
552 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 429 +
860 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 429 +
2485 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3768     avg: 3841     median: 3841 (6%)     max: 3914 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 883     avg: 895     median: 894.5 (13%)     max: 906 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9111     avg: 9254     median: 9254 (11%)     max: 9397 ms
min: 10433     avg: 10544     median: 10544 (12%)     max: 10655 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4188     avg: 4472     median: 4472 (4%)     max: 4756 Points
min: 4297     avg: 4345     median: 4344.5 (4%)     max: 4392 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 SD 429 +
min: 32     avg: 34     median: 34 (7%)     max: 36 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
1434 Points (38%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1965 Points (44%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
3356 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 50366     avg: 51755     median: 51754.5 (18%)     max: 53143 Points
51274 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 SD 429 +
5470 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 SD 429 +
20878 Points (26%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 SD 429 +
6252 Points (2%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 SD 429 +
30859 Points (19%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 429 +
63459 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 429 +
10934 Points (9%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 429 +
27445 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 429 +
4783 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 429 +
35288 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 429 +
78450 Points (8%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
142543 Points (19%)
70208 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5120     avg: 5230     median: 5229.5 (26%)     max: 5339 Points
min: 5986     avg: 6107     median: 6106.5 (31%)     max: 6227 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 429 +
2454 Points (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 429 +
4908 Points (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 SD 429 +
min: 4267     avg: 4449     median: 4449 (29%)     max: 4631 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 650 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 → 95% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 03. 21:55:06

#0 checking url part for id 8075 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11422 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720036506 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8075 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#7 got single benchmarks 8075 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11422 +0.002s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 11422 +0s ... 0.01s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.023s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.025s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)