Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Intel UHD Graphics 617

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

► remove from comparison Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 (GT3e) is an integrated graphics card and the fastest GPU of the Broadwell generation. It is built into several high-end CPUs specified at 47 W TDP. The so-called GT3e GPU offers a fast eDRAM cache as well as 48 EUs (Execution Units) and therefore somewhat more shader power than the previous Iris Pro Graphics 5200. The clock range depends on the model it is built into (up to 1150 MHz with Turbo Boost).

Architecture and Features

Broadwell features a GPU based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which has been optimized in various aspects compared to the previous Gen7.5 (Haswell). Inter alia, the shader arrays called "subslice" have been reorganized and now offer 8 Execution Units (EUs) each. Three subslices form a "slice" for a total of 24 EUs. Combined with other improvements such as larger L1 caches and an optimized frontend, the integrated GPU has become faster and more efficient than its predecessor.

The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 represents the high-end "GT3e" version of the Broadwell GPU family and consists of two slices with 48 EUs in total. In addition, there is also a fast eDRAM cache (128 MB), which can be found only on the Iris Pro.

All Broadwell GPUs support OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 11_1). The video engine can now decode H.265 using both fixed function hardware as well as available GPU shaders. Up to three displays can be connected via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz) or HDMI 1.4a (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 24 Hz). HDMI 2.0, however, is not supported.

Performance

Depending on the benchmark, the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 performs similar to a dedicated GeForce GT 750M or GeForce 940M. Many games of 2014/2015 can be played fluently in WXGA resolution (1366 x 768) and medium detail settings. However, very demanding games such as The Witcher 3 will require lower resolutions and/or details.

Power Consumption

Utilizing a new 14 nm FinFET process, the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is specified at 47 W TDP (entire chip including CPU, GPU and memory controller) and therefore suited for medium-sized notebooks. The TDP is flexible and can be further reduced (37 W), which has a significant impact on performance.

Intel UHD Graphics 617

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics 617

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 (GT2) is a low-end integrated graphics unit, which can be found in the Y-series of the Amber-Lake generation. This "GT2" version offers 24 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at up to 1050 MHz (depending on the CPU model). Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the UHD 617 has to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L/LPDDR3). Compared to the old HD Graphics 615 in Kaby-Lake-Y CPUs, the UHD 617 is the same GPU with slightly different clock speeds (depending on the model) and slight power/performance improvements due to the improved 14nm++ process. Compared to the similar UHD Graphics 615 in other Amber Lake models, the 617 looks to be higher clocked (+50 MHz) and has more headroom due to the higher TDP of 7 versus 5 Watt.

Performance

The 3D performance of the UHD 617 depends on the CPU model and the cooling / TDP-setting of the laptop. Furthermore, the used main memory (single channel, DDR3(L), amount) is influencing performance. On average the UHD graphics 617 should be very similar to the Kaby-Lake HD Graphics 615 due to the same architecture and similar speeds. That means that only low demanding games like Farming Simulator 17 or Rocket League are playable in lowest detail settings.

Features

The revised video engine in the HD 615 and UHD 615 / 617 now supports H.265/HEVC Main10 profile in hardware with 10 bit colors. Furthermore, Googles VP9 codec can also be hardware decoded. The UHD 617 should support HDCP 2.2 and therefore Netflix 4K. HDMI 2.0 however is still only supported with an external converter chip (LSPCon).

Power Consumption

The UHD Graphics 617 can be found in Y processors with 7 W TDP  and is therefore suited for very thin, mostly passively cooled subnotebooks like the MacBook Air 2018.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200Intel UHD Graphics 617
Gen. 9.5 Series
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 compare 40 @ 0.2 - 1.3 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 6100 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 5100 compare 40 @ 0.2 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 655 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 compare 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameBroadwell GT3eKaby-Lake GT2
ArchitectureGen. 8 BroadwellGen. 9 Amber Lake
Pipelines48 - unified24 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus WidtheDRAM + 64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_1), OpenGL 4.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4
technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSync
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2015 30.10.2018
Memory TypeDDR3L/LPDDR3
CPU in Iris Pro Graphics 6200GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-5775C4 x 3300 MHz, 65 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i7-5950HQ4 x 2900 MHz, 47 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i7-5850HQ4 x 2700 MHz, 47 W300 MHz1100 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1050 - 1150 MHz
CPU in UHD Graphics 617GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-10510Y4 x 1200 MHz, 7 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i5-8210Y2 x 1600 MHz, 7 W300 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1050 - 1150 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 322     avg: 338.3     median: 337 (1%)     max: 356 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 286     avg: 299     median: 300 (1%)     max: 311 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
77156 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100535 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 12893     avg: 13059     median: 13058.5 (14%)     max: 13224 Points
4841 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 15361     avg: 15388     median: 15387.5 (4%)     max: 15414 Points
7231 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1662     avg: 1685     median: 1685 (3%)     max: 1708 Points
min: 845     avg: 890     median: 889.5 (2%)     max: 934 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1704     avg: 1737     median: 1736.5 (2%)     max: 1769 Points
min: 947     avg: 997     median: 997 (1%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
3711 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
4496 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3094 Points (4%)
min: 1632     avg: 1672     median: 1671.5 (2%)     max: 1711 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2766 Points (2%)
min: 1509     avg: 1541     median: 1540.5 (1%)     max: 1572 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics 617
3DMark 06
8662 Points (11%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 617
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 34.7     avg: 39.1     median: 39.1 (2%)     max: 43.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 617
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98.6     median: 98.6 (99%)     max: 99.3 %

Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics 617 → 51% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 617:
20.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
14.1  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
12.8  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 617:
61.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
26  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
18.3  fps
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics 617:
16.1  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 617:
67.2  fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 617:
28.2  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
14.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
13.6  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 617:
47.6  fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 617:
27.9  fps
high 1366x768
UHD Graphics 617:
25  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
8.4  fps
Intel UHD Graphics 617lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 11.1120.214.112.8
Rocket League61.22618.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider16.1
Dota 2 Reborn67.228.214.613.6
BioShock Infinite47.627.9258.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1
2
4


4


2








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 01. 18:31:04

#0 checking url part for id 5947 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9356 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719851464 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:16:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5947 +0.02s ... 0.051s

#8 got single benchmarks 5947 +0.005s ... 0.056s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9356 +0s ... 0.056s

#10 got single benchmarks 9356 +0.001s ... 0.057s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.066s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.066s

#14 Got 15 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.068s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.068s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.069s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.07s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.07s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.072s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)