Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Intel Arc A570M

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

► remove from comparison Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card for Kaby Lake models announced in January 2017. As the successor to the Intel Iris Graphics 550 (Skylake), the Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used for 28-Watt models and is equipped with 64 MB eDRAM cache. There should not be any big changes compared to the Iris Graphics 550.

The so called GT3e version of the Kaby Lake GPU probably still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1100 MHz depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 650 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.

Compared to the Iris Plus 640 from the 15-Watt models, the Iris 650 only has a slightly higher maximum clock as well as almost twice the TDP, which allows a better utilization of the Turbo Boost potential.

Performance

The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 650 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.

The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-7567U. Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 650 will probably be on par with a dedicated GeForce 930M and can handle smooth gameplay in modern titles in low up to medium settings.

Features

The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used for 28-Watt processor and therefore medium-sized notebooks.

Intel Arc A570M

► remove from comparison Intel A570M

The Intel Arc A570M (device ID 5696) is a dedicated mobile lower- mid-range graphics card for laptops based on Xe HPG microarchitecture. It uses the ACM-G12 chip and offers all 16 Xe-cores (256 ALUs), 16 ray tracing units and a 128-bit memory bus for 8 GB GDDR6 graphics memory. The cores can clock from 300 MHz (low frequency mode) to 1300 MHz (high frequency) or in short bursts 2050+ MHz (short bursts / Turbo).

The performance of the Arc A570M should be between the Radeon RX 6500M and 6600M and therefore well suited even for demanding games in medium to high detail settings and 1080p. The slower Arc A370M is based on the smaller ACM-G11 chip and should be significantly slower, the similar Arc A550M is a slower clocked variant with a slightly lower TDP.

The chip also integrates two media engines for VP9, AVC, HEVC, and AV1 8k en- and decoding. The 4 display pipes support up to 4x 4k120 HDR via DMI 2.0B or DisplayPort 2.0 10G. 

The A570M is produced in 6nm at TSMC (N6 process) and supports dynamic power share (using Deep Link) with 12th gen Intel CPUs (Alder Lake).

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650Intel Arc A570M
Arc Series
Iris Plus Graphics 655 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 compare 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
Arc A770 compare 4096 @ 2.1 - 2.4 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Arc A750 compare 3584 @ 2.05 - 2.4 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Arc A580 compare 3072 @ 1.7 - 2 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
A770M compare 4096 @ 1.65 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
A730M compare 3072 @ 1.1 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A570M 16 @ 0.9 - 1.3 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A550M compare 16 @ 0.9 - 2.01 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A530M compare 12 @ 0.9 - 1.3 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A370M compare 8 @ 1.55 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Arc A380 compare 1024 @ 2 GHz96 Bit @ 15500 MHz
A310 compare 6 @ 2 GHz64 Bit @ 15500 MHz
A350M compare 6 @ 1.15 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameKaby Lake GT3eAlchemist
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby LakeXe HPG
Pipelines48 - unified16 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1100 (Boost) MHz900 - 1300 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR4GDDR6
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4DirectX 12_2, Shader 6.6, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
technology14 nm6 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement03.01.2017 31.07.2023
TMUs128
ROPs64
Raytracing Cores16
CacheL2: 8 MB
Memory Speed14000 effective = 1750 MHz
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Memory Bandwidth224 GB/s
Power Consumption75 Watt (75 - 95 Watt TGP)
PCIe4 16x
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 2.0 10G Ready
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.intel.com
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics 650GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-7567U2 x 3500 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i5-7287U2 x 3300 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i5-7267U2 x 3100 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel Core i3-7167U2 x 2800 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1000 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1000 - 1100 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
623 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
555 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
161538 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8403     avg: 9150     median: 9149.5 (10%)     max: 9896 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
13153 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1586     avg: 1655     median: 1655 (3%)     max: 1724 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1698 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
2924 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2762 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
3DMark 06
15175 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
8773 Points (6%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
45.2 fps (16%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 41.21     avg: 59.1     median: 59.1 (3%)     max: 77 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.3 % (99%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
336 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
813 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1730 Points (2%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
51.4 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
51.4 Watt (7%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
39.1 dB(A) (63%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
998 MHz (39%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
848 MHz (34%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
64  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
21.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
14.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
113  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
56.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
38.9  fps
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
51.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
20.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
25.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
10.5  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
17.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
39.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
15.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
15  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
32.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
54.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
37.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
36.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
19.9  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
46.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
29.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
42.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
20.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
19.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
14.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
8.2  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
79.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
57.4  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
25.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
21.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
30  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
32  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
15  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
25.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
18.3  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
54.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
35.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
20.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
95  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
64  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
29.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
25  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
21.4  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
56.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
49.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
11.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
5  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
84  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
54.4  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
46.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 650:
13.3  fps

Average Gaming Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dirt 46421.314.2
Rocket League11356.838.9
Prey51.420.2
Mass Effect Andromeda25.810.5
Ghost Recon Wildlands17.6
For Honor39.715.2
Dishonored 215
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare32.4
Titanfall 254.137.9
Farming Simulator 1736.819.9
Battlefield 146.129.5
Civilization VI42.220.2
Deus Ex Mankind Divided19.214.68.2
Overwatch79.257.425.621.4
The Division30
Far Cry Primal3215
Rise of the Tomb Raider25.918.3
Rainbow Six Siege54.235.620.8
Dota 2 Reborn956429.725
The Witcher 321.4
GTA V56.549.911.65
BioShock Infinite8454.446.513.3
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
6
10
5
9
6
1
6
3

5








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 06:45:53

#0 checking url part for id 7655 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11610 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720068353 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7655 +0.019s ... 0.049s

#8 got single benchmarks 7655 +0.005s ... 0.053s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11610 +0s ... 0.053s

#10 got single benchmarks 11610 +0s ... 0.054s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.063s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.063s

#14 Got 51 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.066s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.066s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.067s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.006s ... 0.073s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.073s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.075s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)