Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Intel Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU

The Intel Arc B390 (or Arc Pro B390) is the most powerful integrated graphics unit in the Intel Panther Lake SoC series and offers 12 Xe3 cores. These correspond to 96 CUs and 1,536 ALUs.

Performance

In synthetic benchmarks such as 3DMark Steel Nomad, the Arc B390 reaches the level of an RTX 2060 Laptop GPU, but remains significantly behind a modern RTX 4050 Laptop GPU. In our gaming benchmarks, however, the B390 remains significantly behind the 2060 Mobile at relevant settings. The fast AMD Radeon 8050S (Strix Halo) is also significantly faster. The older Intel Arc 140T (Arrow Lake) is left significantly behind (e.g. by 75% in games). 

Furthermore, performance depends heavily on the cooling and the guaranteed TDP limit. However, even in demanding games such as Anno 117 or The Outer Worlds 2, the performance should be sufficient for playable frame rates at low settings.

Features

The new media engine now supports AV1 encoding and decoding, VVC decoding, AVC 10-bit, and eDP 1.5. The iGPU benefits from support for fast LPDDR5-9600 (up to 96 GB) or DDR5-7200 (up to 128 GB) via a dual-channel memory controller.

The chiplet is manufactured by TSMC using the modern N3E process.

CodenamePanther Lake iGPU
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines96 - unified
Raytracing Cores12
Core Speed2500 (Boost) MHz
AI GPU122 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 768 KB, L2: 16 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0
Man. Technology3 nm
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1 FRL, DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20
Date of Announcement05.01.2026
CPU in Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra X9 378H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H16 x 1600 MHz, 25 W? MHz2500 MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? MHz2300 - 2500 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
7.5 pt (22%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.0639 -99%
...
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
6 -20%
NVIDIA Quadro P5000
6.46 -14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
6.47 -13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI
6.5 -13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
6.53 -13%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
6.54 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
6.57 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
7.2 -4%
NVIDIA RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop
7.35 -2%
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
7.47
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
7.51 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
7.6 2%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
7.64 2%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
7.78 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
8.02 7%
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
8.14 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI
8.21 10%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
8.72 17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
8.99 20%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
22.4 200%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 346%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 919     avg: 966     median: 982 (7%)     max: 1040 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 1460     avg: 1588     median: 1590.5 (11%)     max: 1667 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 5821     avg: 6016     median: 6000 (14%)     max: 6338 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
45597 Points (23%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 25117     avg: 27254     median: 27638 (11%)     max: 30578 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 13329     avg: 14068     median: 14069 (21%)     max: 14605 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 16244     avg: 16858     median: 16951.5 (16%)     max: 17498 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 341014     avg: 369197     median: 369196 (41%)     max: 397379 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 6414     avg: 7321     median: 7436 (19%)     max: 7807 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 4567     avg: 6498     median: 6679 (14%)     max: 7190 Points
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
632405 Points (64%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
296292 Points (35%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 35193     avg: 43900     median: 44565 (42%)     max: 48108 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 67290     avg: 75478     median: 75181 (18%)     max: 82808 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 47254     avg: 47393     median: 47254 (45%)     max: 47672 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 71605     avg: 72723     median: 72722.5 (28%)     max: 73840 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 18263     avg: 18591     median: 18576 (22%)     max: 19256 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 18261     avg: 18432     median: 18329 (14%)     max: 18819 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
66984 Points (19%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
60674 Points (33%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
44482 Points (49%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
46797 Points (61%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 47.9     avg: 50.7     median: 50.7 (15%)     max: 53.5 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
76.9 fps (19%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
3.8 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
50.3 fps (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
37.3 fps (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.7 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
45.5 fps (18%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
87.2 fps (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
103 fps (16%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
86.5 fps (23%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
6.9 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
49.6 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
48.8 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
132 fps (15%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
11.6 fps (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
78.9 fps (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
129 fps (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
101 fps (16%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
7.2 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
23.6 fps (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
179 fps (19%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
11.6 fps (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
48.8 fps (17%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
30.2 fps (15%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
38.6 fps (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
7.1 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
9.5 fps (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
69.4 fps (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
7.7 fps (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
28.9 fps (13%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
19.5 fps (13%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
26.9 fps (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
11538 points (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
131.4 fps (13%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 201     avg: 229.4     median: 228 (13%)     max: 264.54 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 254.5     median: 104.6 (3%)     max: 623 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU OpenCL
min: 55433     avg: 56512     median: 56522 (14%)     max: 58162 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU Vulkan
min: 49510     avg: 58401     median: 60061 (15%)     max: 62177 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1449 Samples/s (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
3930 Samples/s (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
10533 points (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 56     avg: 60.3     median: 61 (8%)     max: 63.7 Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 51.4     avg: 63.6     median: 61.3 (17%)     max: 76.3 Watt
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34     avg: 59.1     median: 60.9 (8%)     max: 75.3 Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4542     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (3%)     max: 0.793 fps per Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
36.2 dB(A) (52%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Forza Horizon 6

Forza Horizon 6

2026
low 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
low TAA 1920x1080
76
War Thunder

War Thunder

2026
med. 1920x1080
165.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
122.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Pragmata

Pragmata

2026
low 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Death Stranding 2

Death Stranding 2

2026
low 1920x1080
30.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crimson Desert

Crimson Desert

2026
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Resident Evil Requiem

Resident Evil Requiem

2026
low 1920x1080
38.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
36.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
35.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
low 1920x1080
131  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
low 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

2025
low 1920x1080
104.3 111.2 176.7 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
57 57.5 58.1 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.4 42.5 43.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28 29.4 30.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19.2 20.1 20.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
The Outer Worlds 2

The Outer Worlds 2

2025
low 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6

2025
low 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Borderlands 4

Borderlands 4

2025
low 1920x1080
40.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
134.8 147.8 149.8 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
111.7 121 124.1 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
86.4 92 92.8 94.8 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
28
29.6
29.9
27.9
27.6
Doom: The Dark Ages

Doom: The Dark Ages

2025
low 1920x1080
36.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

2025
low 1920x1080
54.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
44.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
43.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Assassin's Creed Shadows

Assassin's Creed Shadows

2025
low 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Civilization 7

Civilization 7

2025
low 1920x1080
267  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
154.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
98.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
69.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Monster Hunter Wilds

Monster Hunter Wilds

2025
low 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.8 33.1 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.5 31 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.8 25.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

2025
low 1920x1080
64.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

2024
low 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Marvel Rivals

Marvel Rivals

2024
low 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
36.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
EA Sports FC 25

EA Sports FC 25

2024
ultra 1920x1080
68.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Final Fantasy XVI

Final Fantasy XVI

2024
low 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Space Marine 2

Space Marine 2

2024
low 1920x1080
38.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
35.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Star Wars Outlaws

Star Wars Outlaws

2024
low 1920x1080 cinem.
21.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

2024
low 1920x1080
43 45 47 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34 35 37 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26 28 29 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14 15 16 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
11 11 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
51
69
71
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
136.5 142.7 144.9 145.2 145.9 146.3 160.3 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
130.3 132.2 134.3 135 135.3 135.3 147.7 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100 100.7 103.4 104.3 104.3 104.7 109.6 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.2 36.2 36.8 37.4 38 38.4 38.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.8 25.2 25.4 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Helldivers 2

Helldivers 2

2024
ultra 1920x1080
57.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
58.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
49.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Finals

The Finals

2023
ultra 1920x1080
81.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

2023
low 1920x1080
32.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
225  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
150.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
108.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
ultra 1920x1080
54.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

2023
low 1920x1080
65.3 68.6 75 77.2 77.7 78.7 80.4 85.6 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.3 56.2 59.7 62.3 63.1 63.2 63.9 65.4 68.6 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.2 46.9 49.7 53.8 53.8 54 56 57.8 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.2 33.2 35.6 36.5 40.9 41.2 44.8 44.8 45.5 47.2 47.7 48.7 50.6 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
14.3 24.7 28.3 28.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
110.6
94.4
121.4
116.2
106.5
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
20.2
16.1
21
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
40.1
39.1
34.2
31.4
26.1
46.3
40.6
43.9
46.3
46
33.2
46.1
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
63.8 64.3 68.2 69.2 69.4 71.4 72.3 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.5 52.2 52.3 55.4 58.5 60.8 62.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42.7 45.7 47 49 52.6 54.3 55.6 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
39.4 42.3 44.6 44.6 48.7 50.1 51.7 53.4 54.3 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.4 34.9 37.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
93.8
87
84.3
97.2
89.2
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Witcher 3 v4

The Witcher 3 v4

2023
ultra 1920x1080
44.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Elden Ring

Elden Ring

2022
ultra 1920x1080
56.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Forza Horizon 5

Forza Horizon 5

2021
high 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Death Stranding

Death Stranding

2020
ultra 1920x1080
75.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Valorant

Valorant

2020
high 1920x1080
149  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
95.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
45.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Doom Eternal

Doom Eternal

2020
ultra 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019
ultra 1920x1080
51.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
172.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
67.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
53.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018
low 1280x720
180  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54 66 70 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
304 334 356 359 374 384 388 400 ~ 362 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118.7 119.4 121.9 130.5 132.7 136.6 138.6 141.2 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98.5 99.6 103.3 103.3 103.4 104 107.6 116.7 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
80 88.5 89.7 90.6 95.1 99.4 99.5 101.4 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68 71.7 72.3 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
142  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
51.8 55.9 57 58.4 58.5 59.7 61.1 61.7 62.3 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44.5 45 45.5 46.4 47.1 47.5 47.6 50.3 52.4 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.2 38.8 39.7 40.3 41.2 41.4 41.7 41.8 44.5 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
107.2 123.5 124.3 131.1 134.5 134.8 134.8 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.7 72.6 73.7 73.9 76.1 79.7 83 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.8 52.3 52.8 53.4 54.1 55.4 56.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33.8 38.7 39 41 43.1 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
108.3 112.9 119.8 119.8 122.1 129.5 135 137 154.5 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
78.8 79.5 88 91.6 92.6 95.4 98.4 99 102.3 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100.2 100.3 103.2 103.5 104 104.3 107.6 109.8 112.3 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86.8 96.9 100.5 101.5 101.5 102.5 105.4 111.8 111.8 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
294  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
198.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
106.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
123.4
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
174.7 175.9 176.7 177.6 179.4 182 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
164.7 169.3 171 171.2 173 176.1 ~ 171 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97.9 98.2 99.7 103.3 103.7 108.8 111.9 113.8 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.9 43 43.3 43.4 44.2 45.1 45.2 45.3 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30.6 30.9 31.5 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
171.3
168.2
165.2
172.7
165.3
160.6
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
175.2
172
170.7
180
171.8
166.1
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Forza Horizon 69762362112
War Thunder165.4122.93622.811.5
Pragmata40.129.621.9
Death Stranding 230.426.823.618.2
Crimson Desert
Resident Evil Requiem38.436.335.3
Call of Duty Black Ops 7131816121
Anno 117: Pax Romana5842.930.417.712.3
ARC Raiders13158432920
The Outer Worlds 25243.633.417.9
Battlefield 66254.446.934.825
Borderlands 440.432.826.1
F1 2514411992
Doom: The Dark Ages36.529.326.624.7
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered54.944.243.729
Assassin's Creed Shadows3433292118
Civilization 7267154.298.869.8
Monster Hunter Wilds40.1322925
Kingdom Come Deliverance 264.14738.326.5
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle42.634.233.229.621.1
Marvel Rivals423529
Stalker 236.121.3
EA Sports FC 2568.5
Final Fantasy XVI2928.223.323.2
Space Marine 238.137.335.1
Star Wars Outlaws21.114.7
Black Myth: Wukong4535281511
F1 241461361043725
Helldivers 257.7
Ready or Not58.149.542.436.5
The Finals81.8
Alan Wake 232.531.129.1
Total War Pharaoh225150.3108.991.962
Counter-Strike 254.741.217.8
Cyberpunk 20777661524224
Baldur's Gate 36856504835
Starfield27.625.325.422.9
The Witcher 3 v444.8
Elden Ring56.4
Forza Horizon 58849
Death Stranding75.3
Valorant14995.945.1
Doom Eternal87
Red Dead Redemption 251.3
Control172.267.453.7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider18087816348
Strange Brigade3621301059371
Far Cry 514287797353
X-Plane 11.11584741
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark127745239
Dota 2 Reborn12792105102
The Witcher 3294198.8106.546.6
GTA V1781711054431
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		3
18
5
14		7
18
9
7		11
16
12
2		15
14
9
10
6
4
2
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 02. 18:31:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 02 Jun 2026 09:18:47 +0200 +0.006s ... 0.006s

#4 composed specs +0.015s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.021s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13268 +0.054s ... 0.075s

#8 got single benchmarks 13268 +0.036s ... 0.111s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.111s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +3.115s ... 3.226s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 3.226s

#12 Got 618 rows for game benchmarks. +0.147s ... 3.374s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 3.374s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.025s ... 3.399s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.446s ... 3.845s

#16 return log +0.433s ... 4.278s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU graphics card

Acer Swift 16 AI review: High performance meets impressive cooling

Acer Swift 16 AI review: High performance meets impressive cooling

The new Acer Swift 16 AI pairs Intel's Panther Lake architecture with a vibrant OLED screen and a massive touchpad. The hardware is housed in a sleek chassis and benefits from an excellent cooling system. Operating temperatures remain remarkably low.
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 16", 1.4 kg
Prestige 16 AI+ C3MTG Review: New MSI logo is looking sleek

Prestige 16 AI+ C3MTG Review: New MSI logo is looking sleek

The latest Prestige 16 introduces significant changes to the series including Intel Panther Lake, OLED for all configurations, and a brand new look. However, a few key features have been lost or reduced from last year's design.
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 16", 1.6 kg
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H review: Out with Nvidia, in with Intel Arc B390

Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H review: Out with Nvidia, in with Intel Arc B390

For $400 more than the base model, the Core Ultra X7 XPS 16 configuration offers more RAM, more storage, and significantly more performance without needing to up fan noise, power consumption, or temperatures.
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 16", 1.7 kg
Khadas Mind Pro

Khadas Mind Pro review: High-end mini PC with Intel Core Ultra X7 and Arc graphics as the perfect basis in the Khadas ecosystem

Khadas expands the Mind series with the Mind Pro and relies on the latest generation of Intel processors. In our test, we take a closer look at the variant with Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, analyze the performance using extensive benchmarks, and also take a look at the performance in combination with Mind Graphics 2.
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 566 g
Nearly 20 hours of battery life with Panther Lake - MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ Convertible review

Nearly 20 hours of battery life with Panther Lake - MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ Convertible review

With the Prestige 14 Flip AI+, MSI introduces a compact 14-inch convertible feturin a fast Panther Lake processor and integrated stylus. However, the built-in 60 Hz OLED screen is very dark and does not support HDR.
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.4 kg

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 14 2026 review: Fully reborn with Intel Panther Lake X7

Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  Review » Asus ExpertBook Ultra review: One helluva debut for Intel Panther Lake X7

Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » Intel Panther Lake Arc B390 performance and efficiency analysis: Intel's new iGPU trades blows with the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050

  Review » Intel Panther Lake Core Ultra X9 388H performance analysis - Outpaces Arrow Lake and exceeds Zen 5 in efficiency

  Review » Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407 convertible review - Intel Panther Lake is a game-changer

Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407

Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 15.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2026: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2026

Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX

HP OmniBook X 16 (2026): Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X 16 (2026)

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-171: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 16.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-171

HP EliteBook X G2i 14 NG AI: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook X G2i 14 NG AI

Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T

Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » Acer Swift 16 stays cool even under stress

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.4 kg
   » Acer Swift 16 stays cool even under stress

MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » 65 W AC adapter for the MSI Prestige 16 AI+ can bottleneck charging rate

   » MSI Prestige 16 C3MTG is one of the best XPS 16 alternatives in the market right now

   » 2026 Prestige 16 runs Cyberpunk 2077 on 1080p Ultra at over 45 FPS and it isn't even a gaming laptop

   » All the changes to the 2026 Prestige 16 that MSI probably didn't want you to know about

   » MSI Prestige 16 AI+ C3MTG runs significantly quieter on Balanced mode, but there's a catch

Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
   » Two major reasons to choose the Dell 16 Premium over the latest XPS 16

   » Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 is louder and more power-hungry than the Core Ultra 5 option

   » Dell XPS features more battery charging options than most other laptops

   » Dell XPS 16 OLED configuration brings some interesting advantages and disadvantages

   » Avoid the new XPS 16 Core Ultra 7 option and just go for the far superior Core Ultra X7

Khadas Mind Pro: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 0.6 kg
   » Khadas Mind Pro Mini PC gets pricier: pre-order price only valid until March 27th

   » Khadas Mind Pro mini PC review: From office PC to gaming system with GeForce RTX GPU

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Dell XPS 14 Arc B390 vs. GeForce RTX 4050: 3DMark comparisons don't tell the whole story

   » Be sure to read the Dell XPS 14 service manual before opening up the 2026 model

   » 2026 Dell XPS 14 fixes some of the biggest complaints about the series

Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » Asus' new Zenbook Duo UX8407 is easily the best dual-screen convertible

Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 14.00", 1.1 kg
   » Core Ultra X7 358H vs. Core Ultra 7 255H: Panther Lake throttles less and performs more consistently

   » Arc B390 vs. Radeon 8060S: Two very different GPUs for the same 14-inch screen size

   » Asus ExpertBook Ultra is as fast as many entry-level gaming laptops while being half the size

Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » No chance for AMD: Intel Panther Lake Core Ultra X9 388H trounces AMD Strix Halo at low power signaling handheld gaming domination in 2026

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Book6 Series Hands-On: All models, prices, and launch date

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
Radeon RX 6850M XT
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Radeon 8065S
Radeon 8060S
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 7700S
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop
Radeon RX 6700M
M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
M4 Max 32-Core GPU *
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600M *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
A770M
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Radeon 8050S
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU
Radeon RX 6600S
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Quadro P5200
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro P4200
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M
Radeon 8040S *
Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
Pro A60M *

Class 3

RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
A550M *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S
Quadro P4000
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop
Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU
A370M
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon 890M
Arc 140T
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6450M *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 8-Core
X2-90 *
X2-85 *
Arc 140V
M4 9-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6300M *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon 880M
GeForce MX570
Pro A30M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
T1200 Laptop GPU
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
Adreno 840 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
M4 8-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
T600 Laptop GPU
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Adreno 830 *
Adreno 829 *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
A310
Radeon 780M
GeForce MX550
Arc 7-Core
A350M
Arc 130V
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 860M
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
T550 Laptop GPU
T500 Laptop GPU
GeForce MX450
Arc 130T
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL
Radeon 760M
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Radeon 840M
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 740M
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
Quadro P620
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) *
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Quadro P520
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon 540X *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL *
Quadro P500 *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Vega 10
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Vega 9
Vega 8 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
GeForce MX230
Radeon 820M
Vega 7
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GeForce MX130
Vega 8
UHD Graphics 730
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
GeForce MX110
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 640
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs *
Intel Graphics 1 Xe3 WCL *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Vega 3
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
GeForce 910M

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)