Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU

Intel Arc 7-Core

The Intel Arc iGPU with 7 cores is an integrated graphics adapter based on the Xe LPG architecture (similar to the dedicated Arc GPUs, but with a focus on efficiency). It offers 7 of the 8 Xe cores (112 Xe Vector Engines), 7 raytracing units, 7 samplers and probably also 4 pixel backends.

The Arc name may only be used if at least 16 GB RAM is used in dual channel mode. Otherwise, the iGPU is only called "Intel Graphics" and is also significantly slower.

According to Intel, performance has been doubled compared to the previous generation (probably still in Alder Lake).

The iGPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (probably DX 12_2 like the desktop Arc GPUs). The graphics unit also supports XeSS AI Super Sampling.

The media engine of Meteor Lake is in the SOC tile and supports up to 8k60 10-bit HDR encode and decode of MPEG2, AVC, VP9, HEVC and AV1. The display engine is also in the SoC tile and supports HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.1 20G with up to 8K60 HDR.

The GPU Tile of the Meteor Lake chip is manufactured at TSMC on 5nm (5N process).

CodenameMeteor Lake iGPU
ArchitectureXe LPG
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines7 - unified
Raytracing Cores7
Core Speed2200 (Boost) MHz
CacheL1: 1.3 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.3
Man. Technology5 nm
DisplaysHDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1 20G
Date of Announcement14.12.2023
CPU in Arc 7-CoreGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H14 x 3600 MHz, 28 W? MHz2200 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.4 pt (10%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 345     avg: 411     median: 399 (3%)     max: 489 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 557     avg: 606     median: 597 (4%)     max: 699 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 2436     avg: 2617     median: 2617 (6%)     max: 2798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
20726 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5654     avg: 5699     median: 5699 (7%)     max: 5744 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 10005     avg: 11091     median: 11091 (5%)     max: 12177 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4214     avg: 6724     median: 7009 (11%)     max: 7929 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4575     avg: 7367     median: 7612.5 (7%)     max: 8531 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 158643     avg: 196279     median: 193543 (21%)     max: 239386 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2351     avg: 3171     median: 3229.5 (8%)     max: 3658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2090     avg: 2881     median: 2940.5 (6%)     max: 3319 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 395092     avg: 395903     median: 395903 (40%)     max: 396714 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 145414     avg: 157369     median: 148048 (17%)     max: 178646 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 23725     avg: 27849     median: 29091.5 (27%)     max: 30553 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 28658     avg: 39691     median: 41030.5 (10%)     max: 45644 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 25271     avg: 25991     median: 25990.5 (25%)     max: 26710 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 30252     avg: 31507     median: 31507 (12%)     max: 32762 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 5911     avg: 10246     median: 11067 (13%)     max: 12140 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 5549     avg: 10153     median: 11102 (8%)     max: 12061 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 32855     avg: 37095     median: 36043 (10%)     max: 41299 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 30937     avg: 33515     median: 33850 (18%)     max: 36721 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 41203     avg: 44877     median: 44876.5 (49%)     max: 48550 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 30015     avg: 38321     median: 39957 (52%)     max: 42252 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 16.9     avg: 19.5     median: 19.8 (6%)     max: 21.5 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 5.65     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (1%)     max: 5.97 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 12.3     avg: 13.5     median: 13.5 (4%)     max: 14.6 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 68.4     avg: 71.8     median: 71.8 (8%)     max: 75.1 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 4.61     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (1%)     max: 5.08 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 20.2     avg: 20.3     median: 20.3 (7%)     max: 20.3 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 15.5     avg: 16.1     median: 16.1 (8%)     max: 16.6 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 19.8     avg: 20.5     median: 20.5 (5%)     max: 21.1 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 5.54     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 5.82 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 4.8     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (3%)     max: 5.87 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 32.8     avg: 33.8     median: 33.8 (5%)     max: 34.7 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 3.38     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 3.81 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 15.3     avg: 15.4     median: 15.4 (7%)     max: 15.4 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 9.7     avg: 10.1     median: 10.1 (7%)     max: 10.4 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 13.2     avg: 13.9     median: 13.9 (5%)     max: 14.5 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 14962     avg: 15697     median: 15567 (11%)     max: 16752 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 89.17     avg: 94.1     median: 95.4 (10%)     max: 97.61 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 116.8     avg: 134.8     median: 137.8 (8%)     max: 145.06 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 25.5     avg: 29.7     median: 29.7 (11%)     max: 33.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 77.4     avg: 78.8     median: 78.8 (14%)     max: 80.1 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
193.7 fps (14%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
155.8 fps (15%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 203.3     median: 196.8 (5%)     max: 315 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU OpenCL
min: 26624     avg: 29263     median: 28907 (7%)     max: 33039 points
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 GPU Vulkan
min: 26482     avg: 30064     median: 29437 (7%)     max: 34230 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 708     avg: 762     median: 780 (3%)     max: 809 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 1926     avg: 2458     median: 2517 (4%)     max: 2807 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 5565     avg: 6204     median: 6245 (5%)     max: 6899 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.4     avg: 48.1     median: 48 (6%)     max: 57.4 Watt
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.7     avg: 42.6     median: 41.9 (6%)     max: 46.3 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 44.4     avg: 46     median: 45.9 (10%)     max: 47.7 Watt
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.3987     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (48%)     max: 0.545 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.4368     avg: 0.5     median: 0.6 (47%)     max: 0.589 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
41.4 Watt (12%)
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41     avg: 52.5     median: 54.9 (7%)     max: 59.1 Watt
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.4 fps per Watt (1%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 36.8     avg: 38.9     median: 39.3 (56%)     max: 40.2 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
44.1 64.3 66.2 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41 56.6 57.6 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32 41.7 43.4 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
53.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
38.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
34.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
215  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
62.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
48.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
44.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
34.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
34.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
28.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
95.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
90.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
57.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
23.2 26.8 29.2 29.5 30.1 30.9 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.8 21.6 21.7 24.3 25.2 25.2 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.6 19.1 19.1 20.6 21.3 21.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.8 16.4 16.5 18.8 18.8 19.6 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
45.5
46.3
46.4
34.7
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
5.6
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
17
18.5
18.7
15.1
low 1920x1080
25.3 29.9 30.2 33.5 33.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.7 23.2 25.9 26.4 27.9 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.3 19.5 22.4 22.8 24.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17 19.5 21.5 21.8 23.1 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
45
50.2
50.8
35.5
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
33.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
39.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
40.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
58.7 68 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.5 60 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.3 40 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
36.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
51.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
40.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
79.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
130.2
low 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
89
low 1920x1080
31.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
130.3 133 141 148.6 149 ~ 140 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.3 63 63.9 68 69.5 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48.1 50 53.5 54 57.7 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40 40.7 43.5 44 47.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
37 64 71 74 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34 37 40 41 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31 35 37 37 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31 35 35 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
59
low 1280x720
41 42.6 47.1 47.5 47.5 52 52.2 57 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.4 32.4 35.9 38.3 38.5 40.1 40.3 44.8 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.8 29.9 31.3 31.5 32.9 33.4 34.2 37.3 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
40.8 52.1 58 58.3 59.6 59.8 60.6 64.8 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.8 32.4 32.9 33.2 33.3 33.4 35.4 35.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.1 22.2 22.3 23.1 23.4 25.3 25.3 25.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
90.4 91.6 93.5 93.8 94.3 95.5 97.1 97.7 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59.1 64.5 70.5 77.8 79.2 83 83.1 89.2 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.2 66.3 68.4 73.6 74.6 75.6 75.8 75.9 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.5 58.7 64.9 70.1 70.5 72.9 73 73.3 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
124.6 126 136 138 ~ 131 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
77.6 80 85 88 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42.8 45 51 52 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.3 21.8 23.4 26 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
110 116.9 127.2 132.4 143.6 153 156.3 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
100.5 106.4 119.9 125.5 143.3 148.8 151.6 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.4 31 32.4 33.6 34.1 38.9 39.9 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.7 13.1 13.7 13.7 14.8 15.3 16.6 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
128.7
115.2
117.6
95.2
84.5
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
140
127.8
129.8
118.7
94.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2458523911.4
Last Epoch53.838.73325.3
Skull & Bones33312418
Helldivers 232.12522.721.7
Enshrouded21.518
Palworld34.832.625.223.4
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown215127120
Ready or Not62.748.344.534.5
The Finals7047.739.734.6
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora1514129
EA Sports WRC28.62119.217.9
Alan Wake 215.8
Lords of the Fallen17.111.711.410.8
Total War Pharaoh95.556.835.628.1
Assassin's Creed Mirage333127
Counter-Strike 290.257.937.624.7
Cyberpunk 207728232017
Baldur's Gate 331252121
Lies of P4633.832.627.1
The Crew Motorfest26242017
Starfield19.116.513.210.7
Armored Core 639.732.628.523.5
Atlas Fallen40.540.336.626.4
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart
F1 236357390
Resident Evil 4 Remake36.125.123.6
Company of Heroes 351.545.433.933.3
Sons of the Forest24.917.315.515.2
Atomic Heart40.731.922.816.4
Returnal30292723
Hogwarts Legacy3126.517.313.2
F1 2279.471.952.9
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands50.739.426.822.4
Cyberpunk 2077 1.631.62722.621.6
Strange Brigade140655343
Far Cry 562383534
X-Plane 11.11483832
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark573223
Dota 2 Reborn94767167
The Witcher 3131834822
GTA V1341283414
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
9
19
8
3
14
19
4
2
20
16
1
1
25
5
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $1,249.00
    HP OmniBook 7 AI Laptop 17.3" Touchscreen, Core Ultra 7 258V, 32GB RAM, 2TB SSD, Intel Arc Graphics, AI PC with 47 Tops NPU, Thunderbolt 4, Wi-Fi 7, Long-Lasting Battery, Windows 11H, w/PCO Cooler
  • $699.00
    acer Aspire 14" AI Copilot+ WUXGA (1920 x 1200) Touchscreen Laptop|Intel Core Ultra 7 258V|Integrated Graphics|Backlit|Sleeve| 32GB RAM DDR5 | 1024GB SSD | Windows 11 Home | Bundle with Stylus Pen
  • $1,398.99
    HP OmniBook 7 17.3" FHD IPS Touchscreen AI Laptop Copilot+ PC, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050, 32GB DDR5 Memory, 1TB SSD, Backlit Keyboard, Thunderbolt 4, Windows 11 Pro
  • $539.99
    HP New Generation 15.6" FHD Business AI Laptop, Intel Core 7 150U(10 Cores, Up to 5.4 GHz), 16GB RAM, 512GB PCIE, Microsoft Copilot, Bluetooth 5.4, Ultra Quiet Design, Long Battery Life | Windows 11
  • $1,189.00
    ASUS Zenbook Laptop, 14” WUXGA OLED Touchscreen Display, Intel Core Ultra 7-155H (Up to 4.8Ghz), Intel Arc Graphics, 16GB RAM, 1TB PCIe 4.0, WiFi 6E, Backlit KB, TB 4, PDG HDMI Cable, Win 11 Pro

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 10. 16:45:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Jun 2026 12:51:54 +0200 +0.005s ... 0.005s

#4 composed specs +0.013s ... 0.019s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12257 +0.043s ... 0.062s

#8 got single benchmarks 12257 +0.031s ... 0.093s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.093s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +3.194s ... 3.287s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 3.287s

#12 Got 337 rows for game benchmarks. +0.033s ... 3.321s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 3.321s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.026s ... 3.347s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.509s ... 3.856s

#16 return log +0.309s ... 4.164s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU graphics card

Alldocube iWork GT Ultra

Alldocube iWork GT Ultra convertible review: Alternative to Android tablets with true PC performance

With the iWork GT Ultra, Alldocube offers a versatile Windows convertible with Intel Core Ultra 5 125H. The stylus and keyboard cover are available as a complete package for around $920. But how does the device perform in everyday use in terms of performance, mobility, and battery life? Our test answers the most important questions.
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, 13", 870 g
Minix Elite EU512-AI review: A particularly energy-efficient Core Ultra Mini PC

Minix Elite EU512-AI review: A particularly energy-efficient Core Ultra Mini PC

Mini PCs from the Far East often advertise low prices but come with underpowered processors like the Intel N100. That’s not the case with the Elite series from Minix - these models are equipped with Intel Core Ultra CPUs, yet prices start at just €668 ($780) or €829 ($967). We’re putting this AI-powered mini PC to the review to see what it really offers.
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, 772 g
GMK NucBox K9 mini PC review: Core Ultra 5 125H with Arc 7 graphics

GMK NucBox K9 mini PC review: Core Ultra 5 125H with Arc 7 graphics

The Core Ultra 5 125H may make for a smarter PC, but that doesn't necessarily mean a faster one. Raw performance sits behind the older and cheaper Ryzen 7 7840HS by decent margins.
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, 528 g
Asus NUC 14 Pro review: NUC mini PC with Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, fast Intel Arc iGPU and 2x Thunderbolt 4

Asus NUC 14 Pro review: NUC mini PC with Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, fast Intel Arc iGPU and 2x Thunderbolt 4

Asus has taken over Intel's NUC division and now offers the popular mini PCs with Intel's Meteor Lake processors. This not only gives small desktop computers more CPU power but can also significantly increase 3D performance thanks to the revised iGPU. We have tested the Asus NUC 14 Pro with Intel Core Ultra 5 125H in detail and evaluated the performance based on numerous measurements and benchmarks.
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, 525 g
Minisforum UH125 Pro review: AI mini-PC with Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 32 GB DDR5 RAM and 1 TB SSD comes at a price

Minisforum UH125 Pro review: AI mini-PC with Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 32 GB DDR5 RAM and 1 TB SSD comes at a price

Minisforum is renewing its model range based on the Intel Meteor Lake processors: The UH125 Pro is being launched based on the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H. You can also look forward to a wealth of connectivity, which is currently among the most modern with USB4 and OCuLink. We took a detailed look at the device and analyzed its performance based on numerous measurements and benchmarks.
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, 797 g

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 laptop review: One of the best subnotebooks apart from the keyboard

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 - An extremely slim 2-in-1 with the Core Ultra 5 and 120 Hz AMOLED

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14 laptop review: A successful allrounder with an OLED display

Honor MagicBook X 16 (2026): Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook X 16 (2026)

Asus ExpertBook B3405: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook B3405

Acer Aspire Lite 16 AI AL16-71P: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Lite 16 AI AL16-71P

Acer Aspire 16 A16-71M: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 16 A16-71M

MSI Modern 15 H AI C1MG, Ultra 5 125H: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 15 H AI C1MG, Ultra 5 125H

Dynabook Portégé X30L-M: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Dynabook Portégé X30L-M

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED Q415MA: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED Q415MA

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML, Ultra 5 125H: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML, Ultra 5 125H

HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew1000: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew1000

LG gram 14 2-in-1 14T90S: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » LG gram 14 2-in-1 14T90S

Lenovo Yoga 7 14IML9, Ultra 5 125H: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 14IML9, Ultra 5 125H

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72, Ultra 5 125H: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72, Ultra 5 125H

MSI Prestige 14 AI Evo C1MG: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 AI Evo C1MG

MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo, Ultra 5: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 13.30", 1 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo, Ultra 5

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA, Ultra 5: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA, Ultra 5

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x IMH G4: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 13x IMH G4

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360

Alldocube iWork GT Ultra: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 13.00", 0.9 kg
   » Windows convertible/tablet under 800 euros: iWork GT Ultra - price-performance tip or compromise device?

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 13.50", 1.2 kg
   » The ThinkBook 13x G4 could be one of the best ultrabooks if it were not for the keyboard

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

M4 9-Core GPU *
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)