Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8766B vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

Mediatek MT8766B

► remove from comparison  Helio MT8766B

The Mediatek MT8766B is an entry-level ARM SoC for smartphones and tablets (mainly Android-based) that was introduced in 2020. It integrates four ARM Cortex-A53 cores clocked at up to 2 GHz. and a PowerVR GE6300 GPU. It looks very similar to the older Helio A20 (-200 MHz CPU core clock).

The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4x. Furthermore, a LTE radio with Cat-4 DL (150 Mbps download) and Cat-5 UL (75 Mbps upload) and a 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 5 modem is integrated.

The SoC should be produced in the same 12nm process as the Helio A20 (most likely the same chip).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 435

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (SD435) is a lower mainstream SoC for (Android based) smartphones and tablets. Contrary to the Snapdragon 630, it is still manufactured in a 28-nm process and also consists of an octa-core CPU part with ARM Cortex-A53 cores. However, they are only clocked at up to 1.4 GHz. The integrated X9 LTE modem supports Cat. 4 with maximum transfer rates of 300 Mbps (downstream) and 100 Mbps (upstream). The SoC also includes an Adreno 505 GPU with support for Vulkan and OpenGL ES 3.1. WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.1 are supported as well. The memory controller supports LPDDR3 clocked at 800 MHz (so probably dual-channel DDRL-1600). The main difference to the Snapdragon 430 is the faster LTE modem.

ModelMediatek MT8766BQualcomm Snapdragon 435
Series Mediatek MT8Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8768 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8168 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8766B « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 « 1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2000 MHz1400 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology12 nm28 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8300, Dual-Channel LPDDR3 / LPDDR4X, Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth, LTE Cat-4 DL / Cat-5 UL, H.264 Encode, H.265 DecodeAdreno 505 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth 4.1, LTE Cat. 7, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 Memory Controller
iGPUPowerVR GE8300Qualcomm Adreno 505
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio MT8766B
0.2 pt (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 435 +
7935 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 435 +
7745 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13779 Points (12%)
65%
435 +
min: 7095     avg: 8887     median: 9015.5 (8%)     max: 9345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
853 Points (10%)
137%
435 +
min: 1028     avg: 1199     median: 1167.5 (14%)     max: 1352 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
860 Points (10%)
134%
435 +
min: 1002     avg: 1182     median: 1152 (13%)     max: 1382 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
133 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
455 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
783 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2217 Points (2%)
116%
435 +
min: 2210     avg: 2610     median: 2582 (3%)     max: 2889 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
741 Points (10%)
78%
435 +
577 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2043 Points (5%)
113%
435 +
2308 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2112 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
722 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
725 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1727 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3305 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1865 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2227 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
11505 ms (13%)
98%
435 +
min: 11007     avg: 12667     median: 12750 (15%)     max: 13586 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1609 ms (18%)
95%
435 +
1979 ms (22%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
3920 Points (3%)
82%
435 +
min: 2689     avg: 3112     median: 3209 (3%)     max: 3314 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
27 Points (6%)
100%
435 +
27 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 435 +
min: 42643     avg: 44884     median: 45572 (16%)     max: 46814 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 435 +
min: 4213     avg: 4532     median: 4581.5 (14%)     max: 4750 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 435 +
min: 14261     avg: 15880     median: 16055.5 (20%)     max: 17146 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 435 +
min: 9541     avg: 9568     median: 9563 (3%)     max: 9605 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 435 +
min: 27075     avg: 27665     median: 27740 (17%)     max: 28105 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 435 +
min: 56672     avg: 57644     median: 57289 (10%)     max: 59326 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
15424 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
24878 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
4722 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
30304 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
75328 Points (7%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 435 +
81667 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2761 Points (15%)
68%
435 +
min: 1646     avg: 1876     median: 1875.5 (10%)     max: 2105 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
6844 Points (15%)
101%
435 +
min: 4303     avg: 6883     median: 6882.5 (15%)     max: 9462 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4808 Points (31%)
77%
435 +
min: 3538     avg: 3737     median: 3710 (24%)     max: 3928 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
6431 Points (32%)
75%
435 +
min: 4316     avg: 4876     median: 4814.5 (24%)     max: 5438 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8766B → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 → 95% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 12:58:44

#0 checking url part for id 13125 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8506 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720090724 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13125 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 13125 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8506 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 8506 +0.012s ... 0.024s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.048s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.05s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)