Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T

Samsung Exynos 9611

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9611

The Samsung Exynos 9611 (or Exynos 7 Series 9611) is a mid-range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates 8 processor cores in two clusters (bigLITTLE concept). Four ARM Cortex A73 cores at up to 2.3 GHz for demanding tasks and four ARM Cortex A53 at up to 1.7 GHz for power efficiency. Compared to the older Exynos 9610, the 9611 supports higher resolutions for the rear faced camera.

The integrated LTE modem supports 4G at up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload. Furthermore, 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0 are also integrated in the chip.

The on-board ARM Mali-G72 MP3 graphics card offers three clusters and support for Vulkan, DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES 3.2.

The Exynos 9611 is manufactured in the modern 10nm FinFET process and therefore relatively power efficient and also suited for smaller smartphones.

Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T

The Mediatek Helio X25 MT6797T is an upper mainstream ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in 2016. It is manufactured in a 20 nm process and is equipped with 10 CPU cores. Two fast Cortex-A72 cores are running at up to 2.5 GHz, four Cortex-A53 cores at up to 2 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.55 GHz. All cores support 64-bit and the utilization of three clusters is supposed to improve efficiency according to Mediatek. The two A72 cores are only designed for short "Burst-Performance scenarios" according to Mediatek and are probably not used for sustained workloads. Compared to the similar Helio X20, the X25 offers faster clocked CPU and GPU cores.

The integrated ARM Mali T880 MP4 GPU is clocked at up to 850 MHz and has four cluster (from 16) from the Midgard (4th Gen) architecture.

The chip also includes an LTE modem (Cat. 6 300/50 Mbps, DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, EDGE, CDMA2000, ...) as well as a WLAN 802.11ac (280 Mbps) modem. GPS/Glonass/BeiDou is supported for location. The integrated video encoder can handle up to 4Kx2K H.265 at 30 fps and HDR. The SoC can also decode H.265, H.264 and VP9 in 4K30. 

Power Consumption

The processor is manufactured in a 20 nm process at TSMC and should have an average power consumption under load.

ModelSamsung Exynos 9611Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T
SeriesSamsung ExynosMediatek Mediatek Helio 20
CodenameExynos 7 SeriesCortex-A72 / A53
Series: Mediatek Helio 20 Cortex-A72 / A53
Samsung Exynos 9611 « 1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9610 compare1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9609 compare1.6 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T « 2.5 GHz10 / 10 cores Cortex-A72 / A53
Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797 compare2.3 GHz10 / 10 cores Cortex-A72 / A53
Clock1700 - 2300 MHz2500 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 810 / 10
Technology10 nm20 nm
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP3ARM Mali-T880 MP4 ( - 850 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.mediatek.com
FeaturesUMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 6, TD-SCDMA, 802.11ac WiFi, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, eMMC 5.1, 4K@30 H.265 Video Encoder, H.265 4K@30 Decode, ARM Mali 780 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 9611
0.5 pt (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13103     avg: 18907     median: 20010 (17%)     max: 20393 Points
10490 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1463     avg: 2115     median: 2260 (27%)     max: 2332 Points
1523 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1402     avg: 2087     median: 2279 (26%)     max: 2336 Points
1372 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 345     avg: 347.3     median: 347.5 (15%)     max: 349 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1207     avg: 1310     median: 1323.5 (2%)     max: 1387 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 345     avg: 347     median: 347 (2%)     max: 349 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1063     avg: 1229     median: 1299 (4%)     max: 1326 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1791 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4554 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4332     avg: 4863     median: 4786 (6%)     max: 6212 ms
6470 ms (8%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 7442     avg: 9667     median: 9810 (9%)     max: 10687 Points
6089 Points (5%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 46     avg: 53.4     median: 55 (11%)     max: 57 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
43413 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
6782 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
24236 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
23529 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
41218 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
95765 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 152185     avg: 175473     median: 177197 (17%)     max: 187087 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
150124 Points (20%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5080     avg: 5572     median: 5587 (37%)     max: 5925 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5777     avg: 6166     median: 6144 (31%)     max: 6697 Points
5563 Points (28%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9611 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T → 72% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 29. 21:51:54

#0 checking url part for id 11543 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10556 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719690714 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11543 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 11543 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10556 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 10556 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.033s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.035s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)