Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 850 vs Samsung Exynos 1480

Samsung Exynos 850

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 850

The Samsung Exynos 850 is a System on a Chip (SoC) for entry level smartphones (Android based). It was announced in May 2020 and the first device with it is the Samsung Galaxy A21s. The chip integrates a processor with 8 small ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock with up to 2 GHz (octa core).

The multi threaded performance is quite good thanks to 8 cores, the single threaded performance suffers a bit from the small A55 cores, although the clock rate of up to 2 GHz can help a bit.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE modem (Cat.7 2CA up to 300 MBit/s download, Cat.13 2CA 150 MBit/s upload), a Wi-fi 5 modem (802.11ac), LPPDDR4x memory controller, eMMC 5.1 flash memory controller and a video engine for FHD 60fps encoding and decoding (H.265, H.264, VP9).

It is manufactured in the modern 8nm LPP process at Samsung and should offer a good power efficiency and therefore it is also suited for small smartphones.

Samsung Exynos 1480

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 1480

The Samsung Exynos 1480 is a system on a chip (SoC) for mid-range smartphones and tablets based on Android. The CPU is made up of two clusters, each consisting of four cores. Four Cortex-A78 power cores (up to 2.75 GHz) and four Cortex-A55 power cores (up to 2.05 GHz) are used. The integrated graphics unit (GPU) is a Samsung Xclipse 530. The chipset supports Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3. Both LPDDR4x and LPDDR5 can be connected as RAM. UFS 3.1 is possible as internal memory.

The performance of the new AI engine with 6K MAC NPU is said to be around four times higher than its predecessor. In addition, displays with up to 144 Hz and Full HD+ can be used and cameras with up to 200 MPix are supported. The improved ISP now also enables videos in Ultra HD with up to 60 frames per second and is also capable of HDR and zero-shutter lag (ZSL).

The integrated modem has again received a significant speed boost for downloads and is considerably faster for both 5G-Sub6 (download: up to 5.1 GBit/s, upload: up to 1.28 GBit/s) and 5G-mmWave (download: up to 4.84 GBit/s, upload: up to 0.92 GBit/s), but remains unchanged for uploads since the Exynos 1280. There are no changes for LTE (Cat. 18, download: up to 1.2 GBit/s, upload up to 0.211 GBit/s).

The Exynos 1480 is manufactured by Samsung using the 4 nm process (Samsung 4LPP).

ModelSamsung Exynos 850Samsung Exynos 1480
SeriesSamsung Samsung Exynos
CodenameCortex-A55ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Series: Exynos ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Samsung Exynos 850 « - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A55
Allwinner A523 compare0.48 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A55
UNISOC SC9863A compare1.2 - 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores512 KB L3 Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 1480 « 2.05 - 2.75 GHz8 / 8 cores ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Samsung Exynos 1380 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Clock <=2000 MHz2050 - 2750 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
4 x 2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4 x 2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Technology8 nm4 nm
FeaturesLTE Cat.7 / Cat.13, LPDDR4x RAM, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5), 48 MP Camera, eMMC 5.1, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo6K MAC NPU, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, GNSS (GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo)
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP1Samsung Xclipse 530 ( - 1300 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comsemiconductor.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 850
0.4 pt (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
18816 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2042     avg: 2108     median: 2109 (25%)     max: 2168 Points
5850 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2015     avg: 2091     median: 2079 (24%)     max: 2190 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1157 Points (31%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
3456 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 119     avg: 167.3     median: 178 (8%)     max: 183 Points
891 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 519     avg: 900     median: 1042 (2%)     max: 1087 Points
3349 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
987 Points (10%)
4189 Points (42%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4986 Points (5%)
13929 Points (15%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 8326.9     avg: 8842     median: 8823 (10%)     max: 9397 ms
1013 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4875     avg: 5426     median: 5454.5 (5%)     max: 5904 Points
41576 Points (37%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
25 Points (7%)
126 Points (36%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 35     avg: 36.8     median: 36.5 (8%)     max: 39 Points
135 Points (28%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 25484     avg: 29469     median: 28792.5 (24%)     max: 34806 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 20787     avg: 28847     median: 28119.5 (23%)     max: 38363 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 20716     avg: 21830     median: 22122.5 (4%)     max: 22360 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 45047     avg: 46029     median: 46132 (17%)     max: 46804 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 119981     avg: 126175     median: 125664 (12%)     max: 133391 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 121238     avg: 133665     median: 133304 (8%)     max: 146815 Points
636128 Points (39%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 36486     avg: 40832     median: 41451.5 (11%)     max: 43937 Points
190193 Points (52%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
10533 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
8331 Points (13%)
15251 Points (24%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4894     avg: 5492     median: 5739 (27%)     max: 6065 Points
13393 Points (62%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5433     avg: 5445     median: 5445 (36%)     max: 5457 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6929     avg: 7021     median: 7021 (35%)     max: 7113 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
46.3 MB/s (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
250.7 MB/s (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
36.5 MB/s (45%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1220 MB/s (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 254     avg: 264     median: 264 (10%)     max: 274 Points
784 Points (30%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 1.9     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.02 Watt
4.4 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0     avg: 1     median: 1.2 (1%)     max: 1.894 Watt
1.2 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 850 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 1480 → 371% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 27. 22:01:05

#0 checking url part for id 12728 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17504 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719518465 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:15:18 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12728 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 12728 +0.007s ... 0.04s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17504 +0.001s ... 0.041s

#9 got single benchmarks 17504 +0.003s ... 0.044s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.064s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.066s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)