Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 7885 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

Samsung Exynos 7885

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 7885

The Samsung Exynos 7885 (also called Exynos 7 Series) is a upper mid-range system-on-a-chip (SoC) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched early 2018 alongside the Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 series and features two Cortex-A73 cores clocked at up to 2.2 GHz. Furthermore, there are six power efficient Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.6 GHz, an ARM Mali-G71 MP2 GPU and a LPDDR4x memory controller. The integrated LTE modem supports LTE Cat.12 3CA 600 Mbps download speeds and Cat.13 2CA 150 Mbps upload. 802.11ac WiFi, Bluetooth 5.0 and FM Radio are also in the chip. It is manufactured in 14nm FinFET at Samsung and therefore a rather power efficient SoC.

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

The MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is a upper mid-range ARM-based SoC (system-on-a-chip) that is manufactured using the modern 4 nm process. It was specially designed for use in Android smartphones and is in the upper class in terms of performance. It supports all current mobile communication standards, including 5G SA. 

The CPU works with a total of eight cores, which are divided into two clusters. In the first cluster, an ARM Cortex-A78 power core clocked at 3.1 GHz is joined by three further ARM Cortex-A78 power cores clocked at 3 GHz. In the second cluster, four ARM Cortex-A55 power cores operate at 2.0 GHz. LPDDR5 RAM can be used as RAM and UFS 3.1 is supported as internal memory. 

In terms of connectivity, dual 5G with a theoretical peak download speed of up to 4.7 GBit/s is available, as well as WiFi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3.

The Mediatek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is a variant of the otherwise identical Mediatek Dimensity 8200 that has been specially customised for Xiaomi and features improvements to the camera ISP. An Imagiq 785 image processor is responsible for processing the camera data. Video recordings are supported with up to 4K at 60 fps. The CPU part of the older Dimensity 8100 is very similar and offers the same CPU and GPU cores.

The integrated ARM Mali-G610 MC6 graphics unit can power displays with a resolution of up to 2,960 x 1,440 pixels (WQHD+) and a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz. With Full HD+, even up to 180 Hz is possible.

ModelSamsung Exynos 7885MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
SeriesSamsung ExynosMediatek
CodenameCortex-A73/-A53Cortex-A78 / A55
Series: Cortex-A78 / A55
Samsung Exynos 7885 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Samsung Exynos 7904 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Samsung Exynos 7884B compare1.56 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 compare2 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 compare2 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 compare2 - 2.85 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 compare2 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra « 2 - 3.1 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 920 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7020 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 930 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek MT8188J compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 900 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
Clock2200 MHz2000 - 3100 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
1 x 3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
3 x 3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Technology14 nm4 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G71 MP2, 2x Cortex-A73 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A53 (1.6 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory ControllerARM Mali-G610 MC6 GPU, Dual 5G modem, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, H.264/HEVC video decoding
iGPUARM Mali-G71 MP2ARM Mali-G610 MP6
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.google.com
L3 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13306     avg: 13610     median: 13610 (11%)     max: 13914 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1845     avg: 1948     median: 1948 (23%)     max: 2051 Points
min: 5558     avg: 5801     median: 5800.5 (68%)     max: 6043 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1871     avg: 1937     median: 1937 (22%)     max: 2003 Points
min: 4369     avg: 5005     median: 5005 (57%)     max: 5641 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 981     avg: 1117     median: 1116.5 (30%)     max: 1252 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 3295     avg: 3665     median: 3664.5 (14%)     max: 4034 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1012     avg: 1015     median: 1015 (43%)     max: 1018 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3833     avg: 3874     median: 3873.5 (7%)     max: 3914 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
998 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3889 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1525     avg: 1526     median: 1525.5 (15%)     max: 1526 Points
4858 Points (49%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4429     avg: 4430     median: 4430 (5%)     max: 4431 Points
16050 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1532 Points (21%)
4726 Points (64%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4247 Points (10%)
15265 Points (37%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
4225 Points (7%)
15888 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1491 Points (22%)
4789 Points (72%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
1282 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2724 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
8435 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4084 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
5054 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4123     avg: 4199     median: 4199 (5%)     max: 4275 ms
min: 1221.5     avg: 1227     median: 1227.2 (1%)     max: 1232.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 9165     avg: 9258     median: 9257.5 (8%)     max: 9350 Points
min: 35231     avg: 38727     median: 38726.5 (34%)     max: 42222 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 107     avg: 108     median: 108 (31%)     max: 109 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
57 Points (12%)
min: 122     avg: 122.5     median: 122.5 (26%)     max: 123 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 83284     avg: 85506     median: 85506 (29%)     max: 87728 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 6040     avg: 6117     median: 6117 (19%)     max: 6194 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 32150     avg: 33898     median: 33897.5 (42%)     max: 35645 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 25640     avg: 26164     median: 26163.5 (8%)     max: 26687 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 52916     avg: 53606     median: 53606 (33%)     max: 54296 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 116746     avg: 119786     median: 119786 (21%)     max: 122826 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
903102 Points (55%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
269706 Points (74%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2645 Points (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
3543 Points (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5214     avg: 5301     median: 5300.5 (35%)     max: 5387 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5625     avg: 5771     median: 5770.5 (29%)     max: 5916 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
54.9 MB/s (40%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
1352 MB/s (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
36.8 MB/s (45%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1588 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
33757 Points (53%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 13966     avg: 14423     median: 14423 (67%)     max: 14880 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 784     avg: 828     median: 828 (32%)     max: 872 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.46     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (2%)     max: 5.74 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.997     avg: 1     median: 1 (1%)     max: 1.03 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7885 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra → 304% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 05:58:08

#0 checking url part for id 9936 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15120 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720065488 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.034s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9936 +0.001s ... 0.035s

#7 got single benchmarks 9936 +0.005s ... 0.039s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15120 +0.001s ... 0.04s

#9 got single benchmarks 15120 +0.005s ... 0.045s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.071s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.074s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)