Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Samsung Exynos 1380

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 1380

The Samsung Exynos 1380 is a system on a chip (SoC) designed for mid-range smartphones and tablets running on the Android operating system. The CPU is made up of two clusters, each consisting of four cores. It features four Cortex-A78 performance cores (up to 2.4 GHz) and four Cortex-A55 power-saving cores (up to 2.0 GHz). The integrated graphics unit is an ARM Mali-G68 MP5 with speeds of up to 950 MHz.

The NPU's performance has been improved by around 14 percent compared to its predecessor, with a capacity of 4.9 TOPS. Displays with up to 144 Hz and Full HD+ resolution can now be used, and the chipset supports cameras with up to 200 MPix. The chipset also includes Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3. Both LPDDR4x and LPDDR5 can be used as RAM, and UFS 3.1 is possible as internal storage.

The integrated modem has significantly increased download speeds, supporting both 5G-Sub6 (download: up to 3.79 Gbps (+32%), upload: up to 1.28 Gbps) and 5G-mmWave (download: up to 3.67 Gbps (+75%), upload: up to 0.92 Gbps). The upload speed for LTE (Cat. 18, download: up to 1.2 Gbps, upload: up to 0.211 Gbps (+5%)) has only been slightly improved.

The Exynos 1380 is manufactured by Samsung using the 5-nm process.

MediaTek Dimensity 7050

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 7050

The Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (Mediatek MT8791N/TN)  is a mid-range ARM SoC (system-on-a-chip) that can be used in both smartphones and tablets (mainly Android). The SoC integrates two ARM Cortex-A78 cores with up to 2.6 GHz for demanding tasks and six power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores with clock rates of up to 2 GHz. The specifications are identical to the old Dimensity 1080.

The chip has an integrated sub-6 GHz 5G modem including dual-SIM support that can reach a maximum download speed of up to 2.77 Gbit/s. Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) is supported as well as Bluetooth 5.2.

The memory controller copes with LPDDR4x or LPDDR5 working memory as well as UFS 3.1 mass storage. As an integrated graphics card, the SoC uses the ARM Mali-G68 MC4, which supports displays with 120 Hz as well as HDR10+ at a maximum resolution of 2,520 x 1,440 pixels.

The MediaTek Dimensity 7050 is still manufactured in 6 nm.

ModelSamsung Exynos 1380MediaTek Dimensity 7050
SeriesSamsung ExynosMediatek
CodenameARM Cortex-A55 / A78Cortex-A78 / A55
Series: Cortex-A78 / A55
Samsung Exynos 1480 compare2.05 - 2.75 GHz8 / 8 cores ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Samsung Exynos 1380 « 2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 compare2 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 compare2 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 compare2 - 2.85 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 compare2 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra compare2 - 3.1 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 « 2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 920 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7020 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 930 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek MT8188J compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 900 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A78 / A55
Clock2000 - 2400 MHz2000 - 2600 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology5 nm6 nm
FeaturesNPU, Wi-Fi 802.11ax (2x2 MIMO), Bluetooth 5.3, FM Radio Rx, GNSS (GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo), Triple-ISP2x ARM Cortex-A78 (2.6 GHz), 6x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G68 MC4, 5G NR Sub-6 GHz, LTE
iGPUARM Mali-G68 MP5 ( - 950 MHz)ARM Mali-G68 MP4
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturersemiconductor.samsung.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4227     avg: 4364     median: 4375 (52%)     max: 4460 Points
min: 4044     avg: 4187     median: 4197.5 (49%)     max: 4307 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4176     avg: 4349     median: 4386.5 (50%)     max: 4445 Points
4304 Points (49%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1011     avg: 1016     median: 1014.5 (27%)     max: 1023 Points
min: 947     avg: 957     median: 957.5 (26%)     max: 964 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 2858     avg: 2882     median: 2882.5 (11%)     max: 2906 Points
min: 2397     avg: 2409     median: 2407.5 (9%)     max: 2422 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 771     avg: 781     median: 783 (33%)     max: 788 Points
min: 738     avg: 791     median: 795 (34%)     max: 835 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2719     avg: 2761     median: 2763 (5%)     max: 2817 Points
min: 1973     avg: 2163     median: 2171.5 (4%)     max: 2335 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
786 Points (3%)
762 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2766 Points (9%)
1960 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3550     avg: 3556     median: 3555.5 (36%)     max: 3561 Points
min: 3616     avg: 3697     median: 3630 (36%)     max: 3844 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11130     avg: 11160     median: 11160 (12%)     max: 11190 Points
min: 8532     avg: 8932     median: 8637 (9%)     max: 9628 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3562 Points (48%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8166 Points (20%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
10869 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3811 Points (57%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1099     avg: 1159     median: 1172.3 (1%)     max: 1208.8 ms
min: 1263.6     avg: 1460     median: 1460.1 (2%)     max: 1656.2 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
187 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 33801     avg: 35093     median: 34758 (31%)     max: 36155 Points
min: 31245     avg: 32379     median: 31807 (28%)     max: 34656 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 97     avg: 109.6     median: 108 (31%)     max: 123 Points
min: 66     avg: 83.7     median: 78 (22%)     max: 107 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 124     avg: 131.3     median: 125 (26%)     max: 145 Points
min: 81     avg: 97.7     median: 99 (21%)     max: 113 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 505141     avg: 510383     median: 508957 (31%)     max: 518476 Points
min: 426859     avg: 466886     median: 442871 (27%)     max: 530929 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 151517     avg: 153827     median: 154008 (42%)     max: 155773 Points
min: 115632     avg: 126696     median: 122360 (34%)     max: 142097 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
591842 Points (78%)
min: 5092     avg: 5252     median: 5252 (1%)     max: 5412 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 33.8     avg: 36.1     median: 34.9 (26%)     max: 39.6 MB/s
61.2 MB/s (45%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 121     avg: 264.3     median: 228 (7%)     max: 444 MB/s
581 MB/s (18%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 32.3     avg: 34     median: 32.6 (40%)     max: 37.2 MB/s
37.9 MB/s (47%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 478     avg: 482     median: 484 (13%)     max: 484 MB/s
623 MB/s (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 12748     avg: 16900     median: 17384 (28%)     max: 20032 Points
min: 27787     avg: 28333     median: 28197 (45%)     max: 29014 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11259     avg: 12568     median: 13024 (60%)     max: 13488 Points
min: 12131     avg: 13490     median: 13634.5 (63%)     max: 14561 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 637     avg: 665     median: 665 (25%)     max: 703 Points
min: 575     avg: 638     median: 656 (25%)     max: 682 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.62     avg: 6.2     median: 5.9 (3%)     max: 7.1 Watt
min: 4.31     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (2%)     max: 6.66 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.084     avg: 1.7     median: 1.5 (2%)     max: 2.42 Watt
min: 1.268     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 3.85 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 1380 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 7050 → 102% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 09:43:42

#0 checking url part for id 15010 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15080 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720079021 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 15010 +0.001s ... 0.03s

#7 got single benchmarks 15010 +0.005s ... 0.036s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15080 +0.001s ... 0.036s

#9 got single benchmarks 15080 +0.007s ... 0.043s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.066s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)