Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E2-2000 vs Intel Core i7-10700

AMD E2-2000

► remove from comparison

The AMD E2-2000 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz) and GPU (15 - 20 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-2000 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E2-2000 is a bit below a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders, clocked at 538 - 700 MHz, and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 W by AMD. That's about the same level as Intels (significantly faster) ULV CPUs.

Intel Core i7-10700

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-10700 is a high-end desktop CPU based on the Comet Lake architecture. The CPU offers 8 cores and 16 threads clocked at 2.9 - 4.8 GHz. All cores can run at up to 4.6 GHz.

Compared to the older Core i7-9700, the 10700 now enables HyperThreading and therefore in some applications a nice performance boost. The single core performance is quite similar.

The chip is manufactured on 14nm++ process at Intel. The TDP is rated at 65 Watt (PL1) but the PL2 is set to 224 Watt for short term boosts (up to 28 seconds).

ModelAMD E2-2000Intel Core i7-10700
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Comet Lake
CodenameZacateComet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake
AMD E2-2000 « 1.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 « 2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock1750 MHz2900 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 28 / 16
TDP18 Watt65 Watt
Technology40 nm14 nm
Die Size75 mm2
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallLGA1200
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3
Architecturex86x86
Announced
L3 Cache16 MB
max. Temp.100 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
$340 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8532 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1234 Points (52%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1455 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
196 Points (59%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
16.7 Points (22%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.3 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7611 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
41156 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
52577 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9898 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
119.5 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6555 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
43007 MIPS (25%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5293 MIPS (63%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
84.8 fps (30%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
236 fps (54%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
11.6 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.3 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
315.4 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
439.6 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15497 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
62614 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
62334 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13579 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
20080 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8580 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1299 Points (55%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8173 Points (15%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1304 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8196 Points (26%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5726 Points (57%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
32174 Points (35%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
752 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
244 Points (51%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
116.3 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
148 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.8 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10700 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 08:00:05

#0 checking url part for id 3632 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13214 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720072805 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3632 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#7 got single benchmarks 3632 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13214 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 13214 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.012s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.029s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.031s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)