Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E2-1800 vs Intel Core i3-10320

AMD E2-1800

► remove from comparison

The AMD E2-1800 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-450, the E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz)  and GPU (20-80 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-1800 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The difference to the older 6320 in the E-450 is a 20-80MHz higher clock rate.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

Intel Core i3-10320

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10320

The Intel Core i3-10320 is an entry level quad-core desktop processor based on the Comet Lake-S architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.8 and 4.6 GHz and can execute up to eight threads with its four cores simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. 

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The performance is similar to the old high end Intel Core i7-7700K due to the same architecture and similar clock speeds. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 90 Watt are consumed (PL2 for 28s).

ModelAMD E2-1800Intel Core i3-10320
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Comet Lake
CodenameZacateComet Lake-S
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 « 1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 « 3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock1700 MHz3800 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 8
TDP18 Watt65 Watt
Technology40 nm14 nm
Die Size75 mm2
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallLGA 1200
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86
Announced
L3 Cache7.9 MB
max. Temp.100 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
$162 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10320
32.2 pt (45%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5986 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1185 Points (50%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
458 Points (51%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2320 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
949 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
188 Points (57%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.66 Points
10.5 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.26     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.34 Points
2.1 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 997     avg: 1093     median: 1110 (7%)     max: 1128 Points
7164 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2068     avg: 2115     median: 2121 (2%)     max: 2147 Points
28383 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 2245     avg: 2312     median: 2321 (2%)     max: 2374 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1099     avg: 1192     median: 1208 (1%)     max: 1226 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1900     avg: 2126     median: 2152 (25%)     max: 2381 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 60     avg: 67.2     median: 69.1 (14%)     max: 72.3 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 456     avg: 482.3     median: 486 (1%)     max: 505 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25864 MIPS (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4899 MIPS (59%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
3.3 fps (1%)
58.8 fps (21%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
18.3 fps (4%)
218 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.2 fps (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.0263     avg: 0     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0526 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.0406     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0759 GB/s
0.9 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 0.0891     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0961 GB/s
5.3 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
469 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 527     avg: 1025     median: 1082.5 (2%)     max: 1124 Points
9911 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 45     avg: 46.7     median: 46.6 (10%)     max: 48 s
9.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 101     avg: 105     median: 103.2 (4%)     max: 114.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2250     avg: 2300     median: 2277 (10%)     max: 2384 s
516 s (2%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 9610     avg: 9926     median: 9800 (5%)     max: 10530 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 7900     avg: 7972     median: 8000 (6%)     max: 8000 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 E2-1800 +
3.9 Points (50%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1858     avg: 2000     median: 1993 (2%)     max: 2146 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 682     avg: 724     median: 736 (2%)     max: 740 Points
10518 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 9739     avg: 9796     median: 9796 (8%)     max: 9853 Points
63063 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 701     avg: 708     median: 708 (2%)     max: 715 Points
9675 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 935     avg: 939     median: 938.5 (2%)     max: 942 Points
13564 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4368 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4846 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1784     avg: 1789     median: 1788.5 (14%)     max: 1793 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1487     avg: 1502     median: 1502 (14%)     max: 1517 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1939     avg: 1949     median: 1948.5 (4%)     max: 1958 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1770     avg: 1772     median: 1772 (4%)     max: 1774 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1775     avg: 1781     median: 1781 (5%)     max: 1787 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
784 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
160 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
224 Points (47%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1254 Points (48%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
115 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
96.3 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.9 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-1800 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10320 → 1320% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 07:57:56

#0 checking url part for id 3144 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14009 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720072676 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3144 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#7 got single benchmarks 3144 +0.01s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14009 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#9 got single benchmarks 14009 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.053s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.055s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)