Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E2-1800 vs Intel Core i3-10100F vs Intel Core i5-10400F

AMD E2-1800

► remove from comparison

The AMD E2-1800 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-450, the E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz)  and GPU (20-80 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-1800 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The difference to the older 6320 in the E-450 is a 20-80MHz higher clock rate.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

Intel Core i3-10100F

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10100F

The Intel Core i3-10100F is an entry level quad-core processor for desktop PCs based on the Comet Lake-S architecture. It offers four cores clocked at 3.6 - 4.3 GHz with HyperThreading / SMT support (8 threads). The CPU is still manufactured on 14nm++ and does not feature an integrated graphics card. Compared to the older Coffee Lake Core i3-9100F, the i3-10100F offers a 100 MHz higher Boost speed, HyperThreading and support for faster DDR4 memory (2666 MHz).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the 10100F as of August 2023, it's reasonable to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i5-10200H.

Intel specifies the CPU with a TDP of 65 Watt. For desktops that means that the processor won't need big cooling solutions and can be used in small cases.

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD E2-1800Intel Core i3-10100FIntel Core i5-10400F
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameZacateComet LakeComet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 « 1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Core i9-10900K3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-107002.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F « 3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-107002.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock1700 MHz3600 - 4300 MHz2900 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1.5 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 86 / 12
TDP18 Watt65 Watt65 Watt
Technology40 nm14 nm14 nm
Die Size75 mm2126 mm2
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallLGA1200LGA1200
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3DDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
L3 Cache6 MB12 MB
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
$122 U.S.$155 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
33.2 pt (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
438 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3201 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1332 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
180 Points (54%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.66 Points
2248%
1 i5-10400F +
14.4 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.26     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.34 Points
2 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 997     avg: 1093     median: 1110 (7%)     max: 1128 Points
6719 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 2068     avg: 2115     median: 2121 (2%)     max: 2147 Points
1724%
1 i5-10400F +
36564 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 2245     avg: 2312     median: 2321 (2%)     max: 2374 Points
2064%
1 i5-10400F +
47901 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1099     avg: 1192     median: 1208 (1%)     max: 1226 Points
8849 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1900     avg: 2126     median: 2152 (25%)     max: 2381 s
134.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 60     avg: 67.2     median: 69.1 (14%)     max: 72.3 s
6.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 456     avg: 482.3     median: 486 (1%)     max: 505 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
36731 MIPS (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5064 MIPS (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E2-1800 +
3.3 fps (1%)
2489%
1 i5-10400F +
81.2 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E2-1800 +
18.3 fps (4%)
1246%
1 i5-10400F +
228.5 fps (53%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
11.2 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0263     avg: 0     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0526 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0406     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0759 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0891     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0961 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
332.4 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 527     avg: 1025     median: 1082.5 (2%)     max: 1124 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 45     avg: 46.7     median: 46.6 (10%)     max: 48 s
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 101     avg: 105     median: 103.2 (4%)     max: 114.8 s
19.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 2250     avg: 2300     median: 2277 (10%)     max: 2384 s
470.4 s (2%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 9610     avg: 9926     median: 9800 (5%)     max: 10530 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 7900     avg: 7972     median: 8000 (6%)     max: 8000 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 E2-1800 +
3.9 Points (50%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1858     avg: 2000     median: 1993 (2%)     max: 2146 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 682     avg: 724     median: 736 (2%)     max: 740 Points
1975%
1 i5-10400F +
14539 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 9739     avg: 9796     median: 9796 (8%)     max: 9853 Points
62086 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
61795 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
62883 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 701     avg: 708     median: 708 (2%)     max: 715 Points
1683%
1 i5-10400F +
11914 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 935     avg: 939     median: 938.5 (2%)     max: 942 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7548 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1072 Points (45%)
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (51%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3650 Points (7%)
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6349 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5587 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25403 Points (28%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1784     avg: 1789     median: 1788.5 (14%)     max: 1793 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1487     avg: 1502     median: 1502 (14%)     max: 1517 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1939     avg: 1949     median: 1948.5 (4%)     max: 1958 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1770     avg: 1772     median: 1772 (4%)     max: 1774 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1775     avg: 1781     median: 1781 (5%)     max: 1787 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
849 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
215 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
135.8 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
125.5 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-1800 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10100F → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 02. 06:06:50

#0 checking url part for id 3144 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12774 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719893210 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3144 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 3144 +0.01s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12774 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 12774 +0.003s ... 0.021s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#12 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.004s ... 0.028s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.062s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.062s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)