Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E-350 vs Intel Atom N2600 vs AMD E-300

AMD E-350

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-350 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-350 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

Performance

The average E-350 in our database is in the same league as the V120, E-450, E1-2500 and also the Celeron SU2300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

The ThinkPad X121e as well as the ThinkPad X120e are among the fastest systems built around the E-350 that we know of.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics adapter offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

Intel Atom N2600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom N2600 is a dual core entry level processor for netbooks and tablets. It was officially announced in December 2011 after some troubles with the graphics drivers (according to rumors). 

The N2600 features a PowerVR SGX545 based graphics card (at 400MHz) named Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 and a video decoding engine for MPEG4 Part2, VC-1, WMV9, and H.264. Furthermore, the chip now also supports DisplayPort 1.1 and HDMI 1.3a outputs.

The processor core is still similar to the old Atom processors. Therefore the performance of the N2600 is comparable to an older Atom N570.

The integrated 64Bit Single-Channel DDR3-800/1067 memory controller supports two SODIMMS and a maximum of 2 GB RAM.

AMD E-300

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-300 (codename Zacate) is a low-end dual-core processor designed for the smaller laptops and netbooks. The E-series processor has a relatively fast iGPU and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

An E-300 has two Bobcat processor cores running at 1.3 GHz, each with the access to 512 KB of Level 2 cache (1 M in total). In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an out-of-order execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

The Radeon HD 6310 iGPU has 80 unified shaders and an UVD3 video processing engine. The iGPU has no trouble outshining the Intel GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, and it does not lag behind the Nvidia ION, either. The Radeon has support for HDMI 1.4a video output.

Performance

The average E-300 in our database is in the same league as the A4-1250, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which isn't a great result. This is a fairly slow chip, as of mid 2022; expect to see plenty of slowdowns no matter what it is that you are currently doing.

Power consumption

This APU has a default TDP of 18 W, meaning an active cooling solution is a must.

The AMD E-300 is manufactured on a 32 nm process leading to really, really low, as of 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD E-350Intel Atom N2600AMD E-300
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel AtomAMD E-Series
CodenameZacateCedarview-MZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 « 1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Atom N28502 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N28001.86 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N26501.73 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2600 « 1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 « 1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1600 MHz1600 MHz1300 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 42 / 2
TDP18 Watt3.5 Watt18 Watt
Technology40 nm32 nm32 nm
Die Size75 mm275 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C
SocketFT1 (BGA413)FCBGA559FT1 (BGA413)
FeaturesDDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4AGMA 3600 (400MHz), Single Channel Memory Controller (2GB DDR3)DDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVM
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6310Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 6310
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com
$47 U.S.
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.62 Points
79%
1 E-300 +
min: 0.46     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E-300 +
min: 0.24     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (6%)     max: 0.26 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1029     avg: 1048     median: 1048.5 (6%)     max: 1064 Points
min: 531     avg: 540     median: 541 (3%)     max: 547 Points
853 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1887     avg: 1997     median: 2005 (1%)     max: 2080 Points
min: 1434     avg: 1513     median: 1527.5 (1%)     max: 1562 Points
1176 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2034     avg: 2182     median: 2195.5 (2%)     max: 2250 Points
80%
1 E-300 +
min: 1714     avg: 1762     median: 1761.5 (1%)     max: 1809 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1122     avg: 1140     median: 1140 (1%)     max: 1158 Points
81%
1 E-300 +
min: 899     avg: 920     median: 920 (1%)     max: 941 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 2054     avg: 2130     median: 2093 (25%)     max: 2257 s
2064 s (24%)
2511 s (30%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 64     avg: 68.7     median: 68.8 (14%)     max: 72.1 s
66 s (13%)
79 s (16%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2600 +
9.9 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2600 +
9.8 fps (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 985     avg: 1016     median: 1021 (2%)     max: 1033 Points
min: 795     avg: 812     median: 812 (2%)     max: 829 Points
min: 836     avg: 839     median: 838.5 (2%)     max: 841 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 49     avg: 51.2     median: 50 (11%)     max: 61 s
92 s (20%)
min: 59     avg: 59.5     median: 59.5 (13%)     max: 60 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 109     avg: 111.6     median: 112 (5%)     max: 115 s
204 s (9%)
min: 132     avg: 133.5     median: 133.5 (6%)     max: 135 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2410     avg: 2466     median: 2460 (11%)     max: 2539 s
4541 s (20%)
min: 2920     avg: 2941     median: 2940.5 (13%)     max: 2961 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 9290     avg: 9647     median: 9790 (5%)     max: 9860 MIPS
83%
1 N2600 +
8139 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 7490     avg: 7520     median: 7530 (6%)     max: 7540 MFLOPS
90%
1 N2600 +
6745 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N2600 +
1631 Points (3%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (49%)     max: 3.8 Points
3.4 Points (44%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 1818     avg: 1933     median: 1982 (2%)     max: 1998 Points
min: 1544     avg: 1580     median: 1579.5 (1%)     max: 1615 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 605     avg: 638     median: 609 (2%)     max: 690 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD E-350 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N2600 → 77% n=10

Average Benchmarks AMD E-300 → 88% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 19:01:37

#0 checking url part for id 1509 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2684 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2854 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719853297 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1509 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 1509 +0.02s ... 0.028s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 2684 +0.001s ... 0.029s

#10 got single benchmarks 2684 +0.007s ... 0.035s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 2854 +0.001s ... 0.036s

#12 got single benchmarks 2854 +0.005s ... 0.04s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.061s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.062s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.062s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.062s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)