Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E-240 vs Intel Core i7-10700K

AMD E-240

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-240 (codename Zacate) is a single core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-240 one Bobcat core (the second one is deactivated) can access 512KB level 2 cache. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (AMD V-Series) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-240 should be between a 2 GHz Atom and a Celeron single core with 1.1 GHz.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD.

Intel Core i7-10700K

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-10700K is a high-end desktop CPU based on the Comet Lake architecture. The CPU offers 8 cores and 16 threads clocked at 3.8 - 5.1 GHz. The TDP is rated at 125 Watt (PL1) but the PL2 is set to 229 Watt for short term boosts (up to 56 seconds).

show full text
ModelAMD E-240Intel Core i7-10700K
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Comet Lake
CodenameZacateComet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 « 1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock1500 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache64 KB512 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 18 / 16
TDP18 Watt125 Watt
Technology40 nm14 nm
Die Size75 mm2
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallLGA1200
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
Architecturex86x86
Announced
L3 Cache16 MB
max. Temp.100 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
$400 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10700K
37.8 pt (52%)
AMD E1-2100
2.47 -93%
...
Intel Core i5-12450H
37.5 -1%
Intel Core i5-1335U
37.7 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
37.7 0%
Intel Core i7-1270P
37.7 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
37.7 0%
Intel Core i5-1245U
37.8 0%
Intel Core i7-1255U
37.8 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 6600U
37.8 0%
Intel Core i7-1265U
37.8 0%
Intel Core i7-10700K
37.8
AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
38 1%
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS
38 1%
Intel Core i5-1345U
38 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
38.1 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
38.3 1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
38.4 2%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
38.4 2%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
38.6 2%
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
38.7 2%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
57 51%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
72.1 91%
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
496 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4882 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2027 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
208 Points (63%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0.3 Points (0%)
22.2 Points (29%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (59%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 891     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (6%)     max: 984 Points
7910 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
50670 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
64901 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 988     avg: 1016     median: 1015.5 (1%)     max: 1043 Points
10201 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
4472 s (53%)
85.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
137.4 s (28%)
3.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8469 Points (13%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
54050 MIPS (31%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5647 MIPS (68%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
121 fps (42%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
269 fps (62%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.3 fps (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.2 GB/s (29%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
217.4 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 497     avg: 501     median: 500.5 (1%)     max: 504 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
57.5 s (12%)
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
120.3 s (5%)
17.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
391.3 s (2%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 3750     avg: 4097     median: 4270 (2%)     max: 4270 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 3520     avg: 3730     median: 3520 (3%)     max: 4150 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 E-240 +
2.5 Points (32%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
269 Points (1%)
18064 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
72174 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
72375 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
74085 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
18637 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
24791 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10963 Points (46%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1371     avg: 1374     median: 1373.5 (58%)     max: 1376 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8911     avg: 8925     median: 8925 (16%)     max: 8939 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1368 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8903 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6247 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
34735 Points (38%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
747 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
245 Points (51%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
205 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
207.7 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.8 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E-240 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10700K → 2208% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 06:50:51

#0 checking url part for id 1511 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12778 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720068651 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1511 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#7 got single benchmarks 1511 +0.005s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12778 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 12778 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.039s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.041s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)