Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5105 vs Intel Core i5-4590

Intel Celeron N5105

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5105

The Intel Celeron N5105 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive desktops and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 2.9 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5105 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N5105 in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1005G1 and the Ryzen 3 3250U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 10 Watts (mobile and lower clocked N5100 6W). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

Intel Core i5-4590

► remove from comparison Intel 4590

The Intel Core i5-4590 is a desktop processor with 4 core and 4 threads (no HyperThreading / SMT) based on the Haswell architecture. The cores clock from 3.3. - 3.7 GHz and the SoC integrates 6 MB level 3 cache. The integrated Intel HD graphics 4600 GPU clocks from 350 - 1150 MHz and the integrated memory controller supports up to 32 GB of DDR3-1600.

ModelIntel Celeron N5105Intel Core i5-4590
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Core i5 (Desktop)
CodenameJasper LakeHaswell
Series: Core i5 (Desktop) Haswell
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-4590 « 3.3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-4460 compare3.2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-4430 compare3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz3300 - 3700 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP10 Watt84 Watt
Technology10 nm22 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1338FCLGA1150
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAHD Graphics 4600 (350 - 1150 MHz), DDR3-1600 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (450 - 800 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 4600 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB
Transistors1400 Million
Die Size177 mm2
$202 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5105
21.7 pt (30%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
2175 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
618 Points (26%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
235 Points (26%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
826 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
368 Points (2%)
144%
4590 +
530 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
108.1 Points (33%)
135%
4590 +
146 Points (44%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 4590 +
5.9 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 4590 +
1.6 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 4590 +
5479 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 4590 +
18998 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
11153 MIPS (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3108 MIPS (37%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2 fps (4%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2940 Seconds (37%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1573 Seconds (11%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.2 sec (25%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4394 Points (12%)
156%
4590 +
6863 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 4590 +
54816 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3869 Points (10%)
130%
4590 +
5022 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5498 Points (10%)
128%
4590 +
7040 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1643 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
653 Points (28%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2080 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
649 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2069 Points (7%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1582 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
96.2 Points (28%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
134.2 Points (28%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
531 Points (20%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
24 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
22.7 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
16.2 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5105 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-4590 → 139% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 08:32:56

#0 checking url part for id 13111 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6948 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720074775 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13111 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 13111 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6948 +0s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 6948 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.028s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.031s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)