Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core i7-1195G7

Intel Celeron N5095

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095

The Intel Celeron N5095 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. The Celeron was announced in early 2021. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz (base clock speed) Boosting up to 2.9 GHz (single-core Boost) with 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache but no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology. This processor is manufactured on Intel's first-gen 10 nm process to be not unlike the Ice Lake-U Core-series processors. The faster Celeron N5105 is notable for being more energy efficient (10 W TDP vs N5095's 15 W) yet featuring a faster iGPU model (24 EU UHD Graphics versus 16 EU UHD Graphics, with a higher clock rate to boot).

Architecture

Tremont architecture brings many improvements over the outgoing Goldmont architecture we know from Pentium N5030 and so many other N-class CPUs. According to Intel, the new architecture brings a 30% boost in single thread performance (+10% to +80% in SPECint and SPECfp depending on the test).

While the older N-class Celerons and Pentiums had to be content with up to 8 GB of DDR4-2400 RAM, Celeron N5095 is officially compatible with up to 16 GB of dual-channel DDR4-2933 or quad-channel LPDDR4x-2933 memory. Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+) support is partially baked into the chip. The Celeron supports up to 8 PCI-Express 3.0 lanes, up to 14 USB 3.2 ports and up to two SATA III ports. Four PCI-Express 3.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 3.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Jasper Lake processor package is larger compared to what Gemini Lake models had (35 x 24 mm vs. 25 x 24 mm). Please note that the Celeron gets soldered on to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The average N5095 in our database matches the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Even if the cooling system is great and the Power Limits are high as the sky, some slight architectural improvements together with the updated manufacturing node and higher-than-usual wattage of the Celeron are not nearly enough to let it compete with modern Core and Ryzen-series processors. It's a good option for basic day-to-day tasks, but anything beyond that will be a struggle.

Graphics

The CPU features the DirectX 12-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics iGPU running at 450 MHz to 750 MHz. The graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 displays with resolutions up to 4096x2160@60; it will happily decode HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs. The latest AV1 codec is not supported, though. (You can still play such a video but it will be software-decoded rather than hardware-decoded which puts a hard limit on the watchable resolution as the CPU cores are not very fast here.)

This is not a gaming GPU by any stretch of imagination. It is just as fast as an HD Graphics 515; it will let you play the least demanding titles (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided you are OK with 720p resolution and lowest quality preset possible.

Power consumption

Most N-class Celerons and Pentiums have a 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit). The Celeron N5095 on the other hand has a 15 Watt TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core i3/i5/i7 processors. This basically means that passively cooled designs are out of the question with this chip.

This Intel processor is manufactured on Intel's first-gen or second-gen 10 nm process [no precise data available] for OK, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-1195G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1195G7

The Intel Core i7-1195G7 is a quad-core SoC from the Tiger Lake-UP3 product family designed for thin laptops and Ultrabooks that was introduced in 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading). The base clock (minimum) depends on the configured TDP and can range from 1.3 GHz (12 Watt TDP) up to 2.9 GHz (28 W). The Turbo on one core can reach up to 5 GHz (Turbo Boost 3.0). All cores can reach up to 4.6 GHz. The i7-1195G7 is part of the Tiger Lake UP3 refresh and is the fastest CPU of the Tiger-Lake U line.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs supports four lanes of PCIe 4, AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6E in the chip.

The 1195G7 integrates the Intel Iris Xe graphics adapter with 96 EUs clocked at 400 - 1400 MHz. The GPU and CPU can together use the 12 MB of L3 cache.

Performance

The average 1195G7 in our database matches the Intel Core i5-10300H in multi-thread performance while, perhaps surprisingly, lagging behind the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U. The makes the i7 a decent lower mid-range chip, as of early 2022. It'll run most apps with virtually no delays or slowdowns which is what the vast majority of users wants.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of slightly more than 30 W, the VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K is among the fastest laptops built around the 1195G7 that we know of. It can be about 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a default TDP of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The i7-1195G7 is built with Intel's 3rd generation 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for below average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron N5095Intel Core i7-1195G7
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Tiger Lake
CodenameJasper LakeTiger Lake-UP3
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1195G7 « 2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz2900 - 5000 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 8
TDP15 Watt28 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1338BGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache320 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5095
21.6 pt (30%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1195G7
34.9 pt (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
89 Points (62%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
307 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2150     avg: 2174     median: 2164 (2%)     max: 2219 Points
min: 3142     avg: 5022     median: 5337 (5%)     max: 6806 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 587     avg: 608     median: 611 (26%)     max: 621 Points
min: 1290     avg: 1457     median: 1455 (62%)     max: 1624 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 228     avg: 234     median: 234 (26%)     max: 239 Points
min: 498     avg: 563     median: 559 (62%)     max: 620 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 804     avg: 825     median: 827 (2%)     max: 844 Points
min: 1212     avg: 1907     median: 1932 (5%)     max: 2590 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 221     avg: 343     median: 364 (2%)     max: 379 Points
min: 574     avg: 853     median: 940 (6%)     max: 999 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 95.4     avg: 103.9     median: 106 (32%)     max: 109 Points
min: 198     avg: 221.4     median: 222 (67%)     max: 238 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.65     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (6%)     max: 4.76 Points
10.6 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.25     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (32%)     max: 1.29 Points
2.7 Points (67%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3527     avg: 3545     median: 3544.5 (21%)     max: 3562 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 12218     avg: 12283     median: 12283 (9%)     max: 12348 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 16442     avg: 16860     median: 16860 (12%)     max: 17278 Points
40873 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 5224     avg: 5338     median: 5337.5 (7%)     max: 5451 Points
12384 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 605.375     avg: 611     median: 611.4 (7%)     max: 617.326 s
281.4 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 19.202     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.779 s
8.2 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1630     avg: 1706     median: 1705.5 (3%)     max: 1781 Points
6334 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 10924     avg: 11024     median: 11013 (6%)     max: 11168 MIPS
min: 17053     avg: 23469     median: 24669 (14%)     max: 26183 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2935     avg: 3074     median: 3100 (37%)     max: 3124 MIPS
min: 5059     avg: 5409     median: 5386 (64%)     max: 5890 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 24.75     avg: 25     median: 25 (9%)     max: 25.25 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 112.75     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (27%)     max: 120.25 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (4%)     max: 2.05 fps
min: 4.23     avg: 6.5     median: 6.6 (12%)     max: 8.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.6 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (6%)
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.5 GB/s (7%)
6.4 GB/s (17%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2936 Seconds (37%)
min: 1058     avg: 1105     median: 1105 (14%)     max: 1152 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1502     avg: 1548     median: 1547 (11%)     max: 1624 Seconds
min: 473     avg: 691     median: 597.5 (4%)     max: 1211 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (25%)     max: 1.2 sec
min: 0.53     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.611 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5266     avg: 5272     median: 5272 (11%)     max: 5278 Points
9989 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
20.5 s (4%)
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
45.7 s (2%)
14.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1039 s (5%)
354.2 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4224     avg: 4309     median: 4287 (12%)     max: 4439 Points
min: 6684     avg: 10304     median: 10438.5 (28%)     max: 13153 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 41689     avg: 42092     median: 42091.5 (34%)     max: 42494 Points
min: 63087     avg: 67596     median: 67595.5 (55%)     max: 72104 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 41654     avg: 42066     median: 42065.5 (34%)     max: 42477 Points
min: 64343     avg: 67940     median: 67939.5 (55%)     max: 71536 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 46730     avg: 47458     median: 47458 (40%)     max: 48186 Points
min: 65247     avg: 71962     median: 71962 (61%)     max: 78677 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3720     avg: 3823     median: 3846 (10%)     max: 3888 Points
min: 5428     avg: 8477     median: 8745 (22%)     max: 10705 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5400     avg: 5496     median: 5499 (10%)     max: 5572 Points
min: 7982     avg: 12497     median: 13225 (24%)     max: 15514 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1595     avg: 1649     median: 1656 (7%)     max: 1696 Points
min: 2687     avg: 4165     median: 4266 (18%)     max: 5913 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1896     avg: 2064     median: 2064 (56%)     max: 2232 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 7596     avg: 7644     median: 7644 (30%)     max: 7692 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 637     avg: 649     median: 650.5 (27%)     max: 659 Points
min: 1519     avg: 1569     median: 1536 (65%)     max: 1649 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1933     avg: 2010     median: 2028 (4%)     max: 2052 Points
min: 4241     avg: 4940     median: 4734 (8%)     max: 6349 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 628     avg: 644     median: 646.5 (3%)     max: 655 Points
min: 1575     avg: 1606     median: 1605.5 (7%)     max: 1636 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1985     avg: 2029     median: 2030.5 (6%)     max: 2070 Points
min: 4683     avg: 5066     median: 5066 (16%)     max: 5449 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2858     avg: 2896     median: 2900 (29%)     max: 2929 Points
min: 6818     avg: 6894     median: 6894 (69%)     max: 6970 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7759     avg: 7856     median: 7842 (9%)     max: 7968 Points
min: 18904     avg: 20630     median: 20629.5 (23%)     max: 22355 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1557     avg: 1578     median: 1571.5 (2%)     max: 1619 ms
min: 594     avg: 664     median: 612 (1%)     max: 1047 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
118.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
69945 Points (61%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 94.2     avg: 95.2     median: 95.2 (27%)     max: 96.2 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 114.3     avg: 123.4     median: 125.3 (26%)     max: 127.2 Points
min: 195     avg: 255     median: 261 (54%)     max: 271 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 473     avg: 486     median: 490 (19%)     max: 495 Points
min: 1341     avg: 1412     median: 1435 (55%)     max: 1460 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.1     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 24.8 Watt
min: 15.6     avg: 40.8     median: 36.7 (6%)     max: 65.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20.7     avg: 22     median: 22.1 (4%)     max: 23 Watt
min: 18.4     avg: 46     median: 49.3 (9%)     max: 66 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.32     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (4%)     max: 4.34 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.6     avg: 17     median: 17.2 (13%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt
min: 15.1     avg: 21.6     median: 20 (15%)     max: 35.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5095 → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1195G7 → 211% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 03. 23:49:56

#0 checking url part for id 13189 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13181 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720043396 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13189 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 13189 +0.007s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13181 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#9 got single benchmarks 13181 +0.014s ... 0.036s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.052s ... 0.087s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.089s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)