Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200

Intel Celeron J4025

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4025

The Intel Celeron J4025 is an energy-efficient, dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake Refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 2 GHz to 2.9 GHz (single core boost). Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and the integrated UHD Graphics 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel on a 14 nm process. What makes these newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, their smaller chip area.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is familiar to us from Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A moderately large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of Goldmont Plus' strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to Goldmont. Still, Gemini Lake Refresh processors are a clear step-down from the Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

J4025 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few J4025-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight on to the motherboard for good (FCBGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

The Celeron J4025 is positioned in the lower entry level and only slightly faster than the mobile Celeron N4020. Therefore, it is best suited for basic tasks like word processing and web browsing with just two or three tabs open.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like HD Graphics 520 or UHD Graphics 615 or so many other widespread Intel iGPUs.

Just like HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 supports DX 12 and has 12 EUs clocked at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about it.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution will let you run up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9 videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a hard limit on the video resolution that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 YouTube videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power Consumption

As a J-series CPU, the TDP is rated at 10 Watts and therefore 4 W higher than the mobile N4020. 

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium T4200 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4200) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T4200 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. 

Intel® Pentium® Processors do not support the following features:

  • Intel® Virtualization Technology
  • Intel® Dynamic Acceleration
  • Intel® Dynamic FSB Frequency Switching
  • C3E
  • Deeper Sleep State (C4)
  • Intel® Enhanced Deeper Sleep State

Therefore, the power consumption in idle mode should be a bit above similar clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs. Furtheremore, virtualization technology VT-x is also not available for the T4200.

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T4200 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Sumpreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4200 should be sufficient.

The Pentium T4200 is based on the Intel Penryn core and features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-step pipeline. 

ModelIntel Celeron J4025Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Pentium Dual Core
CodenameGemini Lake RefreshPenryn
Series: Pentium Dual Core Penryn
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz2000 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt35 Watt
Technology14 nm45 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1090PG478
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 600 (12 EUs, 250 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit, iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
FSB800
L1 Cache128 KB
Transistors410 Million
Die Size107 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4025
16.9 pt (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
857 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
461 Points (20%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
178 Points (20%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
293 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
148 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
77 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.8 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2337 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4556 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
7049 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3920 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
983 s (12%)
min: 1236     avg: 1643     median: 1242 (15%)     max: 2451 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
31.1 s (6%)
min: 39     avg: 51.4     median: 39.3 (8%)     max: 76 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
783 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
4955 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2636 MIPS (32%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10.6 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
53.1 fps (12%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
7396 Seconds (94%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
3792 Seconds (27%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.4 sec (31%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2575 Points (5%)
min: 1578     avg: 1660     median: 1636 (3%)     max: 1784 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
23.1 s (5%)
min: 22     avg: 25     median: 25 (5%)     max: 28 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.9 s (2%)
min: 54     avg: 58.7     median: 54 (2%)     max: 68 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1176 s (5%)
min: 1341     avg: 1606     median: 1747 (8%)     max: 1830 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T4200 +
min: 18119     avg: 18259     median: 18259 (9%)     max: 18399 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T4200 +
min: 14415     avg: 14562     median: 14561.5 (11%)     max: 14708 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T4200 +
min: 3910     avg: 4188     median: 4110.5 (8%)     max: 4756 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T4200 +
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (71%)     max: 5.1 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T4200 +
3434 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4284 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
41689 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
41654 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
46730 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3720 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5474 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
500 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
927 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
497 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
919 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2170 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3847 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2151 ms (3%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
67.1 Points (19%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
89.2 Points (19%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
362 Points (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4025 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 → 91% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 11:16:07

#0 checking url part for id 14663 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 456 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720084567 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14663 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 14663 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 456 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 456 +0.016s ... 0.031s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.028s ... 0.059s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.061s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)