Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 5205U vs Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i3-10110U

Intel Celeron 5205U

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron 5205U

The Intel Celeron 5205U is a power efficient entry-level dual-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and was announced in October 2019. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake Celeron 4205U processors, the difference is the higher clock speed (+100 MHz) and support for faster memory. The processor cores are clocked at only 1.9 GHz (no Turbo) and don't support SMT / HyperThreading (so only 2 threads). More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The integrated graphics adapter is still the same as in the previous generations. It is called only Intel UHD Graphics but is still the same Intel UHD Graphics 610 like in the Pentium 4205U. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder and an integrated dual channel LPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2400 memory controller (compared to DDR4-2666 in the faster and costlier Core i3/i5/i7 processors).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the 5205U as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be about half as fast as the Core i3-10110U (Comet Lake, 2 cores, 4 threads, up to 4.1 GHz). Which is nothing to write home about, really, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This Celeron has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Intel officialy allows laptop manufacturers to reduce that value somewhat, 12.5 W being the lower limit, resulting in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Unlike most Comet Lake family processors, Celeron 5205U is fairly likely to actually stick to that limitation as its cores are not Boost-enabled.

Last but not the least, this CPU is manufactured on an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process making for subpar energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-8650U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8650U

The Intel Core i7-8650U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i7-7600U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8650U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.9 GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 4,2 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behaviour will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads. The performance however is highly depending on the TDP settings and cooling solution of the laptop. Especially, longer loads will show varying results in different laptops.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i3-10110U

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10110U

The Intel Core i3-10110U is a dual-core SoC of the Comet Lake family. The i3 is designed for use in ultraportable laptops of the more affordable flavor as well as mini-PCs. It was announced in August 2019. Just like the other Comet Lake processors, this Core i3 features several advantages over the outgoing Whiskey Lake family including support for faster memory (up to LPDDR4-2933).

Core i3-10110U runs at 2.1 GHz to 4.1 GHz (only 3.7 GHz are reachable when under multi-thread load). Hyper-Threading support is enabled for 4 processing threads in total.

Performance

The average 10110U in our database shapes up to be a decent entry-level CPU, as of late 2021, its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly matching those of the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U and also the Core i3-8145U. While not a whole lot faster than Intel's more affordable Pentium Gold and Pentium Silver chips, the i3 will still let you run most apps with virtually no annoying slowdowns.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 runs at up to 1,000 MHz. What makes this specific iGPU peculiar is that it only has 23 Execution Units at its disposal, not the 24 EUs typical for a UHD Graphics 620. Otherwise, it's the usual affair with 4K monitor support (up to three displays at the same time) and a hardware video decoder that's friends with VP9, AVC, HEVC but not the newer AV1 video codec.

Power consumption

This Core i3 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. By going for the lowest value, it will be possible to build a passively cooled system around the SoC.

The i3-10110U is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processees for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron 5205UIntel Core i7-8650UIntel Core i3-10110U
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Kaby Lake RefreshIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-UKaby Lake RefreshComet Lake-U
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-U
Intel Core i7-10810U1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5205U « 1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-8650U « 1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10810U1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U « 2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1900 MHz1900 - 4200 MHz2100 - 4100 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 82 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1528BGA1356BGA1528
FeaturesLPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NILPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 610 (300 - 900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$107 U.S.$409 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB4 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10110U
27.1 pt (38%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1910     avg: 2142     median: 2142 (2%)     max: 2374 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1031     avg: 1033     median: 1032.5 (44%)     max: 1034 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 400     avg: 402     median: 401 (45%)     max: 405 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 743     avg: 808     median: 753 (2%)     max: 928 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 451     avg: 589     median: 605 (4%)     max: 675 Points
min: 314     avg: 351.8     median: 321 (2%)     max: 405 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 128     avg: 165     median: 169 (51%)     max: 178 Points
min: 129     avg: 159     median: 162 (49%)     max: 172 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.04     avg: 6.4     median: 6.8 (9%)     max: 7.24 Points
3.6 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.67     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (48%)     max: 2.04 Points
1.9 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5307     avg: 6337     median: 6629 (40%)     max: 6782 Points
min: 6311     avg: 6349     median: 6349 (38%)     max: 6387 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16227     avg: 18738     median: 18635 (14%)     max: 21455 Points
min: 11023     avg: 11205     median: 11204.5 (8%)     max: 11386 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21677 Points (15%)
14261 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6864 Points (8%)
8184 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 268.3     avg: 301.9     median: 302.8 (4%)     max: 334.6 s
min: 523     avg: 533     median: 533 (6%)     max: 543 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 8.636     avg: 9.6     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 10.28 s
min: 13.92     avg: 15.8     median: 15.8 (3%)     max: 17.62 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
413.8 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
10.3 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4140     avg: 4423     median: 4319 (7%)     max: 4915 Points
min: 1695     avg: 2156     median: 2156 (3%)     max: 2617 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 9858     avg: 10292     median: 10291.5 (6%)     max: 10725 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4038     avg: 4154     median: 4153.5 (50%)     max: 4269 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 35     avg: 39.1     median: 39.8 (14%)     max: 41.98 fps
min: 20.55     avg: 20.6     median: 20.6 (7%)     max: 20.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 149     avg: 165.4     median: 169.6 (39%)     max: 173.2 fps
min: 106.5     avg: 110.1     median: 110.1 (25%)     max: 113.6 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 2.72     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (5%)     max: 3.12 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.393     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.444 GB/s
min: 0.21     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.23 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.662     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.733 GB/s
min: 0.346     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (6%)     max: 0.394 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.9     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (11%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
min: 1.9     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (5%)     max: 2.2 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1174     avg: 1280     median: 1279.5 (9%)     max: 1385 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.74     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (16%)     max: 0.76 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 4487     avg: 6716     median: 6936 (15%)     max: 7939 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8     avg: 8.6     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 9 s
min: 9.404     avg: 9.4     median: 9.4 (2%)     max: 9.446 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 19     avg: 19.7     median: 20 (1%)     max: 20.1 s
min: 21.75     avg: 21.9     median: 21.9 (1%)     max: 22.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 501     avg: 513     median: 508 (2%)     max: 542 s
min: 529     avg: 539     median: 538.5 (2%)     max: 548 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
19125 Points (17%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5168     avg: 7106     median: 6863 (19%)     max: 8887 Points
min: 3863     avg: 4262     median: 4157 (11%)     max: 4765 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 39040     avg: 42198     median: 41275 (34%)     max: 47797 Points
min: 35890     avg: 39828     median: 40101 (33%)     max: 43494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 41011     avg: 43029     median: 41405.5 (34%)     max: 48293 Points
min: 34543     avg: 38846     median: 39392 (32%)     max: 42604 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 44090     avg: 52920     median: 56455 (48%)     max: 58675 Points
min: 42440     avg: 47299     median: 47408 (40%)     max: 52050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4442     avg: 5935     median: 6089 (15%)     max: 7416 Points
min: 3489     avg: 3565     median: 3579 (9%)     max: 3627 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6823     avg: 8895     median: 9167 (16%)     max: 10541 Points
min: 5122     avg: 5365     median: 5285 (9%)     max: 5687 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2685     avg: 3010     median: 2876 (12%)     max: 3569 Points
min: 1745     avg: 3394     median: 3394 (14%)     max: 5043 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
480 Points (20%)
min: 957     avg: 987     median: 987 (42%)     max: 1017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
912 Points (2%)
min: 2017     avg: 2026     median: 2025.5 (4%)     max: 2034 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1002 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2034 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4455 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8289 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4397 Points (60%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7865 Points (19%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
7335 Points (13%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3470 Points (68%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7635 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3765 Points (56%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
6421 Points (52%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6567 Points (60%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
8305 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
8126 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7706 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 809     avg: 1126     median: 1076.5 (1%)     max: 1912 ms
min: 1220     avg: 1244     median: 1244 (1%)     max: 1268 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 63.8     avg: 74.2     median: 74.4 (1%)     max: 83.1 ms
95.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 11491     avg: 31341     median: 33906 (30%)     max: 42822 Points
29833 Points (26%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
227 Points (47%)
min: 145     avg: 164     median: 164 (34%)     max: 183 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
46.7 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
24.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.9 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 5205U → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8650U → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10110U → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 02. 14:10:59

#0 checking url part for id 11526 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9212 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11463 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719922259 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11526 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 11526 +0.003s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9212 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 9212 +0.013s ... 0.026s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11463 +0.004s ... 0.03s

#12 got single benchmarks 11463 +0.007s ... 0.037s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.052s ... 0.09s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)