Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U vs Intel Processor N200

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U

► remove from comparison AMD Athlon 3150U

The AMD Athlon Gold 3150U is a mobile processor for thin and light entry level laptops. It is based on the Dali series (Raven Ridge Dual Core) and offers two Zen cores clocked at 2.6 to 3.3 GHz with SMT (four threads at once) and 4 MB L3-Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 3 and offers only 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz.

In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Athlon Gold 3150C, but with the exact same specifications (and performance).

Performance

The average 3150U in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-10110U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. In other words, this is an entry-level chip, as of mid 2022. While not slow by any means, it is anything but fast, either.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Athlon has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Most will go for a higher value to reach higher performance levels. Either way, an active cooling solution will be needed to dissipate the heat.

The AMD 3150U is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process resulting in low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelAMD Athlon Gold 3150UIntel Processor N200
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Alder Lake-N
CodenameDali (Zen)Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock2400 - 3300 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.95 °C105 °C
SocketFP5
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Athlon 3150U
22.8 pt (32%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
21.5 pt (30%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (31%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
303 Points (34%)
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
795 Points (2%)
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
352 Points (2%)
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
117 Points (35%)
113 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4 Points (5%)
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (34%)
100%
N200 +
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3639 Points (22%)
108%
N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
7566 Points (5%)
100%
N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
11030 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1280 s (15%)
106%
N200 +
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
40.1 s (8%)
103%
N200 +
26 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1631 Points (3%)
130%
N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
8752 MIPS (5%)
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3065 MIPS (37%)
105%
N200 +
3230 MIPS (39%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
22.5 fps (8%)
16.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
106.6 fps (25%)
80 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2 fps (4%)
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
132%
N200 +
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
167%
N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.2 GB/s (6%)
145%
N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1348 Seconds (9%)
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.9 sec (19%)
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4189 Points (9%)
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
13.9 s (3%)
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
727 s (3%)
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4287 Points (12%)
2765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N200 +
34749 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3923 Points (10%)
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5692 Points (10%)
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1862 Points (8%)
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
956 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
751 Points (32%)
124%
N200 +
928 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1847 Points (3%)
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
891 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
9989 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N200 +
171.3 Points (36%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N200 +
614 Points (24%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon Gold 3150U → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 95% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 09:50:55

#0 checking url part for id 11693 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719906655 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11693 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 11693 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.005s ... 0.021s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.038s ... 0.059s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.061s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)