Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core

► remove from comparison Apple Apple M3 Pro 11-Core

The Apple M3 Pro 11 Core is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple for notebooks that was introduced late 2023. It integrates 11 of the 12 CPU cores with 5 of 6 performance cores with up to 4.06 GHz and 6 efficiency cores with 2.8 GHz.

Compared to the M2 Pro the M3 Pro has been slimmed down somewhat and swaps two performance cores for efficiency cores. This is due to the changed core configuration, as 6 cores are now used per cluster (the M2 Pro and M3 still have 4 cores per cluster). Furthermore, the memory bus has been reduced from 256 bits to 192 bits (150 GB/s vs. 200 GB/s). Thanks to the new architecture and higher clock rates, the new M3 Pro is still slightly faster.

The M3 Pro also integrates a new graphics card with dynamic caching, mesh shading and ray tracing acceleration via hardware. In the entry-level model, only 14 of the chip's 18 cores are used and support up to 3 displays simultaneously (internal and 2 external).

GPU and CPU can jointly access the shared memory on the package (unified memory). This is available in 18 or 36 GB variants and offers 150 GB/s maximum bandwidth (192 bit bus).

The integrated 16-core Neural Engine has also been revised and now offers 18 TOPS peak performance (compared to 15.8 TOPS in the M2 but 35 TOPS in the new A17 Pro). The video engine now also supports AV1 decoding in hardware. H.264, HEVC and ProRes (RAW) can still be decoded and encoded.

Unfortunately, the integrated WLAN only continues to support WiFi 6E (no WiFi 7), unlike the small M3 SoC thunderbolt 4 is also supported (max 40 Gbit/s).

The chip is manufactured in the current 3nm process (N3B) at TSMC and contains 37 billion transistors (-7.5% vs. Apple M2 Pro).

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-78-100 is the least powerful member of the Snapdragon X Elite processor series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The top dog, known as the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if the X Elite is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Our first benchmarks (featuring a 35 W X Elite X1E-78-100) revealed very decent CPU performance figures that see the X Elite going head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. It's also not much faster or slower than the Apple M3 chip with 10 GPU cores. While not groundbreaking, this should be good enough for the user to be able to run any applications in 2024 and 2025.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that's good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming according to our in-house testing results. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno fails to outgun the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-78-100 is set to be slightly less power-hungry than its more powerful brothers. Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and on the performance profile chosen. That's exactly what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core

► remove from comparison Apple Apple M3 Max 16-Core

The Apple M3 Max (16 Core) is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple for notebooks that was launched towards the end of 2023. It integrates a new 16-core CPU with 12 performance cores with up to 4.06 GHz and 4 efficiency cores with 2.8 GHz. There is also a slimmed-down 14-core variant with a 30-core GPU.

Thanks to the higher clock rates and architectural improvements, the processor performance is also significantly better than the M2 Max in benchmarks and can keep up with the fastest mobile CPUs (such as a Core i9-13900HX).

The M3 also integrates a new graphics card with dynamic caching, mesh shading and ray tracing acceleration via hardware. In the top model, all 40 cores of the chip are used and support up to 5 displays simultaneously (internal and 4 external).

GPU and CPU can jointly access the shared memory on the package (unified memory). This is available in 48, 64 and 128 GB variants and offers 400 GB/s maximum bandwidth (512 bit bus).

The integrated 16-core Neural Engine has also been revised and now offers 18 TOPS peak performance (compared to 15.8 TOPS in the M2 but 35 TOPS in the new A17 Pro). The video engine now also supports AV1 decoding in hardware. H.264, HEVC and ProRes (RAW) can still be decoded and encoded. Like its predecessor, the Max chip offers two video engines and can therefore encode and decode two streams simultaneously.

Unfortunately, the integrated WLAN only continues to support WiFi 6E (no WiFi 7), unlike the small M3 SoC thunderbolt 4 is also supported (max 40 Gbit/s).

The chip is manufactured in the current 3nm process (N3B) at TSMC and contains 92 billion transistors (+37% vs. Apple M2 Max). Under load, the CPU part consumes up to 56 watts, the chip can use a total of 78 watts.

ModelApple M3 Pro 11-CoreQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100Apple M3 Max 16-Core
SeriesApple Apple M3Qualcomm Snapdragon XApple Apple M3
Series: Apple M3
Apple M3 Max 16-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M3 Max 14-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core « 2.75 - 4.06 GHz11 / 11 cores
Apple M32.75 - 4.06 GHz8 / 8 cores
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 « - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-1008 / 8 cores Oryon
Apple M3 Max 16-Core « 2.75 - 4.06 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M3 Max 14-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz11 / 11 cores
Apple M32.75 - 4.06 GHz8 / 8 cores
Clock2748 - 4056 MHz <=3400 MHz2748 - 4056 MHz
Cores / Threads11 / 11
5 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core
6 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core
12 / 12
8 x 3.4 GHz
4 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
16 / 16
12 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core
4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core
TDP27 Watt35 Watt78 Watt
Transistors37000 Million92000 Million
Technology3 nm4 nm3 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPUQualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.apple.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.apple.com
CodenameOryon
TDP Turbo PL245 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
34.5 pt (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
144 Points (100%)
min: 102.8     avg: 105.4     median: 105.4 (73%)     max: 108 Points
min: 139     avg: 139.5     median: 139.5 (97%)     max: 140 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
908 Points (17%)
min: 768     avg: 935     median: 956 (18%)     max: 1132 Points
min: 1532     avg: 1572     median: 1572 (29%)     max: 1612 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13315 Points (12%)
min: 10856     avg: 10908     median: 10908 (10%)     max: 10960 Points
min: 24020     avg: 24022     median: 24022 (22%)     max: 24024 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1942 Points (83%)
min: 1111     avg: 1121     median: 1120.5 (48%)     max: 1130 Points
min: 1950     avg: 1959     median: 1959 (83%)     max: 1968 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
502 Points (56%)
min: 416     avg: 418     median: 418 (46%)     max: 420 Points
min: 492     avg: 494.5     median: 494.5 (55%)     max: 497 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3529 Points (9%)
min: 4033     avg: 4081     median: 4080.5 (10%)     max: 4128 Points
min: 5920     avg: 6124     median: 6123.5 (15%)     max: 6327 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1913 Points (12%)
min: 1984     avg: 2080     median: 2079.5 (13%)     max: 2175 Points
min: 3225     avg: 3297     median: 3264 (21%)     max: 3401 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
281 Points (85%)
min: 208     avg: 209     median: 209 (63%)     max: 210 Points
min: 269     avg: 271     median: 271 (82%)     max: 273 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 44935     avg: 45912     median: 45912 (26%)     max: 46889 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4341     avg: 4476     median: 4476 (54%)     max: 4611 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (12%)     max: 7.57 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
355 Seconds (5%)
min: 545     avg: 611     median: 610.5 (8%)     max: 676 Seconds
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (2%)     max: 196 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
365 Seconds (3%)
min: 313     avg: 334.5     median: 334.5 (2%)     max: 356 Seconds
min: 215     avg: 216     median: 216 (2%)     max: 217 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.756     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (16%)     max: 0.77 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14374     avg: 14578     median: 14577.5 (39%)     max: 14781 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8244 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18547     avg: 18734     median: 18734 (33%)     max: 18921 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5015     avg: 5126     median: 5125.5 (22%)     max: 5236 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
3113 Points (84%)
2454 Points (66%)
min: 3096     avg: 3127     median: 3126.5 (84%)     max: 3157 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
14412 Points (57%)
min: 21243     avg: 21254     median: 21253.5 (84%)     max: 21264 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2331 Points (98%)
min: 1669     avg: 1737     median: 1737 (73%)     max: 1805 Points
min: 2318     avg: 2325     median: 2324.5 (98%)     max: 2331 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
13312 Points (24%)
min: 8618     avg: 9105     median: 9104.5 (16%)     max: 9591 Points
min: 22816     avg: 22938     median: 22937.5 (41%)     max: 23059 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
374.1 ms (0%)
min: 454.4     avg: 760     median: 759.7 (1%)     max: 1065 ms
min: 379.2     avg: 385.5     median: 385.5 (0%)     max: 391.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
98732 Points (87%)
79579 Points (70%)
min: 94770     avg: 96363     median: 96362.5 (85%)     max: 97955 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 114.2     avg: 199.6     median: 199.6 (57%)     max: 285 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
431 Points (90%)
min: 134.1     avg: 276.6     median: 276.6 (58%)     max: 419 Points
min: 416     avg: 421     median: 421 (88%)     max: 426 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1966 Points (75%)
min: 978     avg: 1003     median: 1002.5 (38%)     max: 1027 Points
min: 2032     avg: 2042     median: 2041.5 (78%)     max: 2051 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
44.7 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40.1 Watt (7%)
65.3 Watt (12%)
min: 91.8     avg: 92.3     median: 92.3 (17%)     max: 92.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
2.1 Watt (1%)
min: 2.89     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (2%)     max: 3.46 Watt
min: 3.81     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (3%)     max: 6.49 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.8 Watt (5%)
min: 4.89     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 6.05 Watt
min: 4.63     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (7%)     max: 7.91 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
47.7 Points per Watt (36%)
min: 35.1     avg: 35.9     median: 35.9 (27%)     max: 36.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple M3 Pro 11-Core → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 84% n=18

Average Benchmarks Apple M3 Max 16-Core → 123% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 22:44:47

#0 checking url part for id 16354 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15113 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719866687 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16354 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 16354 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.006s ... 0.025s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 15113 +0.001s ... 0.025s

#12 got single benchmarks 15113 +0.005s ... 0.03s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.066s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.066s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)