Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M3 Max 16-Core vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 vs Apple M3 Pro 11-Core

Apple M3 Max 16-Core

► remove from comparison Apple Apple M3 Max 16-Core

The Apple M3 Max (16 Core) is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple for notebooks that was launched towards the end of 2023. It integrates a new 16-core CPU with 12 performance cores with up to 4.06 GHz and 4 efficiency cores with 2.8 GHz. There is also a slimmed-down 14-core variant with a 30-core GPU.

Thanks to the higher clock rates and architectural improvements, the processor performance is also significantly better than the M2 Max in benchmarks and can keep up with the fastest mobile CPUs (such as a Core i9-13900HX).

The M3 also integrates a new graphics card with dynamic caching, mesh shading and ray tracing acceleration via hardware. In the top model, all 40 cores of the chip are used and support up to 5 displays simultaneously (internal and 4 external).

GPU and CPU can jointly access the shared memory on the package (unified memory). This is available in 48, 64 and 128 GB variants and offers 400 GB/s maximum bandwidth (512 bit bus).

The integrated 16-core Neural Engine has also been revised and now offers 18 TOPS peak performance (compared to 15.8 TOPS in the M2 but 35 TOPS in the new A17 Pro). The video engine now also supports AV1 decoding in hardware. H.264, HEVC and ProRes (RAW) can still be decoded and encoded. Like its predecessor, the Max chip offers two video engines and can therefore encode and decode two streams simultaneously.

Unfortunately, the integrated WLAN only continues to support WiFi 6E (no WiFi 7), unlike the small M3 SoC thunderbolt 4 is also supported (max 40 Gbit/s).

The chip is manufactured in the current 3nm process (N3B) at TSMC and contains 92 billion transistors (+37% vs. Apple M2 Max). Under load, the CPU part consumes up to 56 watts, the chip can use a total of 78 watts.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-80-100 is the second-fastest member of the Snapdragon X series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at up to 4.0 GHz, the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno GPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The faster Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU and the same number of CPU cores but with a faster GPU (possibly due to faster clock speeds) and higher CPU clock speeds.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if it is is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The Qualcomm SoC is thought to have at least 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

When all of the 12 cores are under load, they can run at up to 3.4 GHz. The much more desirable 4.0 GHz clock speed is only achievable under single-thread or dual-thread loads.

Given the very similar clock speeds, its multi-thread benchmark scores should be about the same as that of the X1E-78-100 for Ryzen 7 7840U and Apple M3-like performance in most real-world tasks. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the X1E-80-100.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is set to be rather underwhelming. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno is not fast enough to outpace the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-80-100 is most likely going to be less power-hungry than its more powerful brother (the latter can be set to consume up to 80 Watts). Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads because that's what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core

► remove from comparison Apple Apple M3 Pro 11-Core

The Apple M3 Pro 11 Core is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple for notebooks that was introduced late 2023. It integrates 11 of the 12 CPU cores with 5 of 6 performance cores with up to 4.06 GHz and 6 efficiency cores with 2.8 GHz.

Compared to the M2 Pro the M3 Pro has been slimmed down somewhat and swaps two performance cores for efficiency cores. This is due to the changed core configuration, as 6 cores are now used per cluster (the M2 Pro and M3 still have 4 cores per cluster). Furthermore, the memory bus has been reduced from 256 bits to 192 bits (150 GB/s vs. 200 GB/s). Thanks to the new architecture and higher clock rates, the new M3 Pro is still slightly faster.

The M3 Pro also integrates a new graphics card with dynamic caching, mesh shading and ray tracing acceleration via hardware. In the entry-level model, only 14 of the chip's 18 cores are used and support up to 3 displays simultaneously (internal and 2 external).

GPU and CPU can jointly access the shared memory on the package (unified memory). This is available in 18 or 36 GB variants and offers 150 GB/s maximum bandwidth (192 bit bus).

The integrated 16-core Neural Engine has also been revised and now offers 18 TOPS peak performance (compared to 15.8 TOPS in the M2 but 35 TOPS in the new A17 Pro). The video engine now also supports AV1 decoding in hardware. H.264, HEVC and ProRes (RAW) can still be decoded and encoded.

Unfortunately, the integrated WLAN only continues to support WiFi 6E (no WiFi 7), unlike the small M3 SoC thunderbolt 4 is also supported (max 40 Gbit/s).

The chip is manufactured in the current 3nm process (N3B) at TSMC and contains 37 billion transistors (-7.5% vs. Apple M2 Pro).

ModelApple M3 Max 16-CoreQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
SeriesApple Apple M3Qualcomm Snapdragon XApple Apple M3
Series: Apple M3
Apple M3 Max 16-Core « 2.75 - 4.06 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M3 Max 14-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz11 / 11 cores
Apple M32.75 - 4.06 GHz8 / 8 cores
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 « - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-1008 / 8 cores Oryon
Apple M3 Max 16-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M3 Max 14-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core « 2.75 - 4.06 GHz11 / 11 cores
Apple M32.75 - 4.06 GHz8 / 8 cores
Clock2748 - 4056 MHz <=4000 MHz2748 - 4056 MHz
Cores / Threads16 / 16
12 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core
4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core
12 / 12
12 x 4.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
11 / 11
5 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core
6 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core
TDP78 Watt27 Watt
Transistors92000 Million37000 Million
Technology3 nm4 nm3 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUApple M3 Max 40-Core GPUQualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno 3.8 TFLOPS GPU Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.apple.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.apple.com
CodenameOryon
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt

Benchmarks

Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 139     avg: 139.5     median: 139.5 (97%)     max: 140 Points
123 Points (85%)
144 Points (100%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1532     avg: 1572     median: 1572 (29%)     max: 1612 Points
893 Points (17%)
908 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24020     avg: 24022     median: 24022 (22%)     max: 24024 Points
9927 Points (9%)
13315 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1950     avg: 1959     median: 1959 (83%)     max: 1968 Points
1321 Points (56%)
1942 Points (83%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 492     avg: 494.5     median: 494.5 (55%)     max: 497 Points
490 Points (54%)
502 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5920     avg: 6124     median: 6123.5 (15%)     max: 6327 Points
3640 Points (9%)
3529 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3225     avg: 3297     median: 3264 (21%)     max: 3401 Points
2249 Points (14%)
1913 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 269     avg: 271     median: 271 (82%)     max: 273 Points
248 Points (75%)
281 Points (85%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
44404 MIPS (25%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5359 MIPS (64%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.8 fps (12%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (2%)     max: 196 Seconds
637 Seconds (8%)
355 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 215     avg: 216     median: 216 (2%)     max: 217 Seconds
351 Seconds (2%)
365 Seconds (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14877 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
18559 Points (33%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 3096     avg: 3127     median: 3126.5 (84%)     max: 3157 Points
2845 Points (77%)
3113 Points (84%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 21243     avg: 21254     median: 21253.5 (84%)     max: 21264 Points
14458 Points (57%)
14412 Points (57%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2318     avg: 2325     median: 2324.5 (98%)     max: 2331 Points
2331 Points (98%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22816     avg: 22938     median: 22937.5 (41%)     max: 23059 Points
13312 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 379.2     avg: 385.5     median: 385.5 (0%)     max: 391.7 ms
400.3 ms (0%)
374.1 ms (0%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 94770     avg: 96363     median: 96362.5 (85%)     max: 97955 Points
92123 Points (81%)
98732 Points (87%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 416     avg: 421     median: 421 (88%)     max: 426 Points
435 Points (91%)
431 Points (90%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2032     avg: 2042     median: 2041.5 (78%)     max: 2051 Points
1443 Points (55%)
1966 Points (75%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 91.8     avg: 92.3     median: 92.3 (17%)     max: 92.7 Watt
40.1 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.81     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (3%)     max: 6.49 Watt
4.7 Watt (3%)
2.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.63     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (7%)     max: 7.91 Watt
3.3 Watt (4%)
4.8 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 35.1     avg: 35.9     median: 35.9 (27%)     max: 36.7 Points per Watt
47.7 Points per Watt (36%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M3 Max 16-Core → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 → 81% n=16

Average Benchmarks Apple M3 Pro 11-Core → 88% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 27. 17:24:09

#0 checking url part for id 15113 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17575 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16354 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719501849 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:15:18 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15113 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 15113 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17575 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 17575 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 16354 +0.001s ... 0.021s

#12 got single benchmarks 16354 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.024s ... 0.05s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.051s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.052s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.053s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.055s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.056s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.057s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.057s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.057s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.058s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.059s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.06s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.06s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.061s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.061s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.068s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.07s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.071s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.072s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.073s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.076s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.077s

#36 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.079s

#37 return log +0s ... 0.079s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)